To authors with large Steem Power: please consider not voting for yourself when posting an post, for better curation reward distribution by abit

View this thread on: hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com

steem · @abit · Jul 5 '16 (edited)

$1.05

To authors with large Steem Power: please consider not voting for yourself when posting an post, for better curation reward distribution

You know you have a unfair advantage as an author, as you can upvote for yourself instantly when posting a new article. We know that you want eye balls and followers, that's fine.

But that looks greedy. As a popular author, you've already got a lot of people following you. After you voted with a large Steem Power, the reward for people voting after you will be diluted much. For better curation reward distribution, to give your followers' more reward, I sincerely suggest that you don't vote for yourself when posting.

This suggestion applies especially to early adopters for example @dan, @dantheman, @theoretical and @blocktrades, but also applies to new authors who gained meaningful Steem Power via writing, for example @stellabelle, @cryptoctopus, @donkeypong and etc.

Thanks.

//Edit:
For authors with not much Steem Power, I think it's not too bad to vote instantly.

👍 abit, steemychicken1, nanzo-scoop, gavvet, coinbitgold, linouxis9, business, grittenald, tshering-tamang, rimantas, rseixas, magicmonk, mostar, dedriss, justtryme90, stealthtrader, murh, gaitan, jillstein2016, afew, yuda-susanto, algo-rythm, c3zary, nickjames, doesntmatter, macchicken, arcaneinfo, gandamx, karchersmith, stijn, alittle, theflowers, ace108, sictransitgloria, qonq99, vkoreshkoff, stats, steemtest, mest, abusaleh, wawacoffee, puffin
👎 jalantikus

`author`	abit
`permlink`	to-authors-with-large-steem-power-please-consider-not-voting-for-yourself-when-posting-an-post-for-better-curation-reward
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"],"users":["dan","dantheman","theoretical","blocktrades","stellabelle","cryptoctopus","donkeypong"]}
`created`	2016-07-05 10:08:21
`last_update`	2016-07-05 10:11:12
`depth`	0
`children`	12
`last_payout`	2016-08-23 16:54:48
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.824 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.228 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	879
`author_reputation`	141,171,499,037,785
`root_title`	"To authors with large Steem Power: please consider not voting for yourself when posting an post, for better curation reward distribution"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	54,967
`net_rshares`	7,508,164,766,478
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (43)

voter	rshares	pct
afew	805,710,160	1%
alittle	156,019,344	20%
abit	4,963,114,142,335	100%
steemychicken1	1,124,194,078,071	100%
rimantas	27,717,218,516	100%
dedriss	9,437,533,132	100%
linouxis9	73,606,218,990	100%
tshering-tamang	38,776,358,000	100%
mostar	9,905,285,668	100%
gavvet	435,925,567,444	100%
algo-rythm	497,644,958	100%
nanzo-scoop	569,274,479,101	100%
murh	1,395,106,473	11.33%
justtryme90	2,891,621,436	100%
yuda-susanto	586,059,716	100%
coinbitgold	98,250,990,887	100%
business	60,089,043,265	100%
c3zary	269,378,351	100%
grittenald	55,060,947,203	100%
rseixas	16,295,479,154	100%
arcaneinfo	231,883,467	100%
stijn	180,213,488	100%
stealthtrader	1,664,514,250	100%
jalantikus	-214,032,254	-100%
doesntmatter	245,831,892	100%
gandamx	216,610,691	100%
vkoreshkoff	9,530,265	100%
steemtest	4,756,941	100%
qonq99	16,383,222	100%
sictransitgloria	90,336,405	100%
macchicken	243,742,983	100%
ace108	93,367,145	100%
nickjames	266,343,475	100%
karchersmith	211,843,657	100%
jillstein2016	980,961,343	100%
gaitan	1,217,388,672	100%
magicmonk	14,350,343,629	100%
stats	6,049,565	100%
mest	1,209,188	0%
theflowers	98,606,250	100%
puffin	0	100%
wawacoffee	0	100%
abusaleh	0	100%

@abusaleh · Nov 24 '17 (edited)

I get my answer......so kind of you...

properties (22)

`author`	abusaleh
`permlink`	re-abit-to-authors-with-large-steem-power-please-consider-not-voting-for-yourself-when-posting-an-post-for-better-curation-reward-20171124t053127019z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-11-24 05:31:30
`last_update`	2017-11-24 05:31:57
`depth`	1
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2017-12-01 05:31:30
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	38
`author_reputation`	2,843,989,100,548
`root_title`	"To authors with large Steem Power: please consider not voting for yourself when posting an post, for better curation reward distribution"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	21,361,602
`net_rshares`	0

@atomrigs · Aug 15 '16

I have a proposal for steem power rental market. Please give me your comments on it when you have a chance. Thanks,
https://steemit.com/steemit/@atomrigs/proposal-steem-power-rental-market

properties (22)

`author`	atomrigs
`permlink`	re-abit-to-authors-with-large-steem-power-please-consider-not-voting-for-yourself-when-posting-an-post-for-better-curation-reward-20160815t164326222z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steemit/@atomrigs/proposal-steem-power-rental-market"]}
`created`	2016-08-15 16:43:42
`last_update`	2016-08-15 16:43:42
`depth`	1
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2016-08-23 16:54:48
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	188
`author_reputation`	19,860,058,250,291
`root_title`	"To authors with large Steem Power: please consider not voting for yourself when posting an post, for better curation reward distribution"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	819,487
`net_rshares`	0

@masi · Jul 16 '16

Hi @abit i started out on steemit and trading steem few days ago,  am finding it difficult making profit trading on bittrex with only 700 steem and am not the blogger type,  You seem like a nice guy, and knowledgeable is there a ways to make some  easier way making money using steem - Looking to save up for university fees

Thanks Highly Appreciated

👍 masi

`author`	masi
`permlink`	re-abit-to-authors-with-large-steem-power-please-consider-not-voting-for-yourself-when-posting-an-post-for-better-curation-reward-20160716t014142021z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"],"users":["abit"]}
`created`	2016-07-16 01:41:42
`last_update`	2016-07-16 01:41:42
`depth`	1
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2016-08-23 16:54:48
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	351
`author_reputation`	8,235,708,135
`root_title`	"To authors with large Steem Power: please consider not voting for yourself when posting an post, for better curation reward distribution"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	128,792
`net_rshares`	234,471,825
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
masi	0 B		234,471,825	100%

@abit · Jul 28 '16

The easiest way on this platform is blogging. Sorry I don't know how to help you. I'm not good at trading as well, nor blogging.

👍 alittle
👎 masterphoto

`author`	abit
`permlink`	re-masi-re-abit-to-authors-with-large-steem-power-please-consider-not-voting-for-yourself-when-posting-an-post-for-better-curation-reward-20160728t193042504z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"]}
`created`	2016-07-28 19:30:39
`last_update`	2016-07-28 19:30:39
`depth`	2
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2016-08-23 16:54:48
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	128
`author_reputation`	141,171,499,037,785
`root_title`	"To authors with large Steem Power: please consider not voting for yourself when posting an post, for better curation reward distribution"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	444,095
`net_rshares`	99,187,522
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (2)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
alittle	0 B		156,019,344	20%
masterphoto	0 B		-56,831,822	-100%

@miguel12 · Jul 30 '16 (edited)

Hello @abit i am beginning here in steemit,  my question is  that all that people get steem power via writing or buying? ,  and second  who give that steem power and the money of the vote if steem miners mine because they like to have steem, i dont understand where come that money from.  Thanks, 
i show you one my post  https://steemit.com/tooth/@miguel12/the-toothpaste-cause-tooth-decay

properties (22)

`author`	miguel12
`permlink`	re-abit-to-authors-with-large-steem-power-please-consider-not-voting-for-yourself-when-posting-an-post-for-better-curation-reward-20160730t133844796z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"],"users":["abit"],"links":["https://steemit.com/tooth/@miguel12/the-toothpaste-cause-tooth-decay"]}
`created`	2016-07-30 13:38:51
`last_update`	2016-07-30 13:41:51
`depth`	1
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2016-08-23 16:54:48
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	390
`author_reputation`	1,169,071,908,750
`root_title`	"To authors with large Steem Power: please consider not voting for yourself when posting an post, for better curation reward distribution"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	488,496
`net_rshares`	0

@abit · Jul 30 '16

I didn't entirely understand your question, but you can check https://steemit.com/steem/@arhag/where-does-the-money-come-from-a-look-into-the-economics-of-steem and https://steemit.com/money/@lukestokes/the-bitcoinpizza-challenge-winners

properties (22)

`author`	abit
`permlink`	re-miguel12-re-abit-to-authors-with-large-steem-power-please-consider-not-voting-for-yourself-when-posting-an-post-for-better-curation-reward-20160730t232913713z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steem/@arhag/where-does-the-money-come-from-a-look-into-the-economics-of-steem"]}
`created`	2016-07-30 23:29:24
`last_update`	2016-07-30 23:29:24
`depth`	2
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2016-08-23 16:54:48
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	237
`author_reputation`	141,171,499,037,785
`root_title`	"To authors with large Steem Power: please consider not voting for yourself when posting an post, for better curation reward distribution"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	500,847
`net_rshares`	0

@nanzo-scoop · Jul 5 '16

How about if they (we - not sure if I'd be classed as a 'large' SP holder) voted an hour after posting? That could act as an extra incentive for early voters.

I think the issue with getting authors to refrain from voting for themselves early, is that some will do it via a proxy/ shill account. Thereby getting the benefit without being perceived to be greedy.

properties (22)

`author`	nanzo-scoop
`permlink`	re-abit-to-authors-with-large-steem-power-please-consider-not-voting-for-yourself-when-posting-an-post-for-better-curation-reward-20160705t103525976z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"]}
`created`	2016-07-05 10:35:24
`last_update`	2016-07-05 10:35:24
`depth`	1
`children`	4
`last_payout`	2016-08-23 16:54:48
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	361
`author_reputation`	304,748,025,353,998
`root_title`	"To authors with large Steem Power: please consider not voting for yourself when posting an post, for better curation reward distribution"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	55,003
`net_rshares`	0

@abit · Jul 5 '16 (edited)

You have my support if vote an hour after posting.

Anyway it's all about reputation. Technically it's unable to prevent anyone from voting for herself/himself early.

properties (22)

`author`	abit
`permlink`	re-nanzo-scoop-re-abit-to-authors-with-large-steem-power-please-consider-not-voting-for-yourself-when-posting-an-post-for-better-curation-reward-20160705t113358148z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"]}
`created`	2016-07-05 11:34:15
`last_update`	2016-07-05 11:38:27
`depth`	2
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2016-08-23 16:54:48
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	166
`author_reputation`	141,171,499,037,785
`root_title`	"To authors with large Steem Power: please consider not voting for yourself when posting an post, for better curation reward distribution"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	55,072
`net_rshares`	0

@abit · Jul 12 '16 (edited)

testing. removed

properties (22)

`author`	abit
`permlink`	re-nanzo-scoop-re-abit-to-authors-with-large-steem-power-please-consider-not-voting-for-yourself-when-posting-an-post-for-better-curation-reward-20160705t113624059z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"]}
`created`	2016-07-05 11:36:42
`last_update`	2016-07-12 08:00:09
`depth`	2
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2016-08-23 16:54:48
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	16
`author_reputation`	141,171,499,037,785
`root_title`	"To authors with large Steem Power: please consider not voting for yourself when posting an post, for better curation reward distribution"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	55,076
`net_rshares`	0

@ash · Jul 5 '16

what the creep?!

👍 grittenald

`author`	ash
`permlink`	re-abit-re-nanzo-scoop-re-abit-to-authors-with-large-steem-power-please-consider-not-voting-for-yourself-when-posting-an-post-for-better-curation-reward-20160705t115505458z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"]}
`created`	2016-07-05 11:55:06
`last_update`	2016-07-05 11:55:06
`depth`	3
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2016-08-23 16:54:48
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	16
`author_reputation`	286,803,743,324,398
`root_title`	"To authors with large Steem Power: please consider not voting for yourself when posting an post, for better curation reward distribution"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	55,101
`net_rshares`	55,060,947,203
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
grittenald	0 B		55,060,947,203	100%

@abit · Jul 12 '16

@@ -1,8 +1,9 @@
+%3E
 How abou
@@ -154,16 +154,31 @@
 oters.%0A%0A
+Another try.%0A%0A%3E
 I think 
@@ -370,8 +370,18 @@
  greedy.
+%0A%0ATesting.

properties (22)

`author`	abit
`permlink`	re-nanzo-scoop-re-abit-to-authors-with-large-steem-power-please-consider-not-voting-for-yourself-when-posting-an-post-for-better-curation-reward-20160712t075913133z
`category`	steem
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steem"]}
`created`	2016-07-12 07:59:39
`last_update`	2016-07-12 07:59:39
`depth`	2
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2016-08-23 16:54:48
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	147
`author_reputation`	141,171,499,037,785
`root_title`	"To authors with large Steem Power: please consider not voting for yourself when posting an post, for better curation reward distribution"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	83,732
`net_rshares`	0

@sictransitgloria · Jul 22 '16

Completely agree on that. There's a visibility problem for most authors, after 1h you enter in the "dark steem". And when a whale upvote itself, he/she doesn't need to care about the quality of the post, he/she will be visible and people will upvote to get a share. Wrote about it here: https://steemit.com/steemit-ideas/@sictransitgloria/steem-is-not-a-ponzi-scheme-but-it-relies-strongly-on-co-option-and-we-can-hope-it-will-get-better-in-the-future

In the case of the founders or witness, I can understand an self-upvote if they have an important "official" message for the community

properties (22)