This seems like a great idea. To be perfectly honest, I don't think my Tweets or My Facebook Posts with my Steem posts and Steemit links get a lot of attention. That said, I'm not posting and spamming junk to bots either.

I used to game my Facebook and it got maxed at 5000 people, but most of them are people's alts at best and completely fake at worse. I did the same with Twitter, but that got my fist account banned at some point (maybe I spammed a bad ICO).

Don't let the BS discourage you from setting this up though. There are people who are good at catching those who aren't all that impressionable.

Frankly, I suck at Mainstream Social Networking, which is why I strongly support people who are good at it, or discussion on the subject.

I've seen (and used) Wordpress widgets which will show how many likes and retweets a post got on various SNS, so it is easily extractable. It would also be easy for a front end to add it in so we can evaluate reach on other platforms.

### That leads me to my main point
(sorry for the lack of TL:DR.. *ahem* I mean too long didn't read).

Why would you limit it to post authors? I think you should somehow to find a way to reward curators. Sure authors can curate their own stuff but we all have our strengths.

I do like engaging my readers and favourite authors, but personally, I prefer writing and posting to sharing and social networking.

If someone wants to use my blog to attract attention on other social media or even resteeming it, surely they deserve a fair portion of that reward (much like if I post a youtube video I didn't make on Steem). The easiest way to do this would be to just have them comment and upvote that, but voting comments above a few cents can attract the wrong kind of attention from people who don't understand.

Ultimately something like a dao proposal to just give the best influencers SBD would be awesome. Or I could work out my own thing with influencers who want to promote my stuff (it would be an awesome dapp), or I could set said person as a beneficiary. It's getting too complicated though.

Cool thing, worth exploring, just remember it seems like there are several things all must be good at and some of the best influencers have separate social media managers.

I appreciate that you are working on improving the #posh initiative but all we're gonna have is another bot, and who loves bots that much... 
@lordbutterfly already found a solution to trick the bot in milking the curation and he's not gonna be the only one. I'd rather keep things organic and look more into what is shared on twitter, besides the likes and engagement that one post sees on twitter. 

Let's say that I have five friends, and post daily all sort of low quality photography posts, and my friends are liking and commenting on my tweets generating attention towards my tweets. I will according to the new criteria get upvoted form @ocd, but other twitter users unfamiliar with Steem, when looking at this type of posts might get the wrong impression about the platform and what types of users we really are. 

Other case might be that a pretty decent blogger, who really puts efforts in creating quality content, won't get that much attention on a daily basis on his twitter account, but once in a while some other twitter users that might be interested in blogging will get to his tweet, read the post and decide that the platform can be a good choice for starting blogging. 

Which one has brought a true exposure through #posh? The one shit posting and getting appreciated by a bunch of friends, or bot accounts, or someone that shared decent blog posts and got the attention from decent bloggers that can generate quality traffic on Steem by joining it. 

My bet is on the second category and that's why I would avoid creating such a bot. It can be tricked and we get back to the spamming and abusing era while true believers and good content creators slip under the radar and might as well leave the platform disappointed. 

My two cents on your proposal. The whole #posh idea is great by the way and all of my posts get to twitter ever since I found about this way of promoting Steem. I was doing it occasionally before also, but not tagging it in any way and really not interacting with other Steemians through such shares.

@acidyo, Hope that soon **Developers** will showcase interest towards this **Idea 💡** and will going to process this **Posh Automation Idea 💡**.

Good wishes from my side and stay blessed.

Posted using [Partiko Android](https://partiko.app/referral/chireerocks)

# According to the Bible, *How do you influence faith to Christian believers? (Part 3 of 3)*
***(Sorry for sending this comment. We are not looking for our self profit, our intentions is to preach the words of God in any means possible.)***
https://youtu.be/QUE64WdiKMg
https://i.postimg.cc/SxmKZFY2/image.jpg
Comment what you understand of our Youtube Video to receive our full votes. We have 30,000 #SteemPower. It's our little way to **Thank you, our beloved friend.**  
Check our [Discord Chat](https://discord.gg/vzHFNd6) 
Join our Official Community: https://beta.steemit.com/trending/hive-182074

While it’s great many have joined Twitter due to posh. If that is there only reason for sharing content outside of Steem they are not really doing themselves any favors in the long run. It also would not take much for them to simply trade like 4 like, use an army of alts, or simply join communities that require members to support each other to boost numbers. I’m also sure since people buy Instagram accounts all the time the same happens on Twitter. 


Twitter and elsewhere for a content creator is a marketing tool. People should have a game plan and a reason why they choose to spend their time doing something. Along with how they are trying to add value to those that follow them. 

Quite a few months back I wrote a post called [Why You Should Follow Me On Twitter](https://steempeak.com/twitter/@enjar/why-you-should-follow-me-on-twitter). While I have changed up some things I do or don’t do any more over there. Along with whom I support and assist. I regardless have a plan for being over there. 

While not all of it is clear of why i'm doing so since that post is more about how i try and add value to my followers there.  It's quite clear i have a reason for investing my time over there. While votes are nice in the short term i'm after something much bigger. As we all should be. 

I do think those analytics would be very, very interesting.  I have a suspicion that in my case, the traction I might generate through my limited Twitter following would be limited.  It might, however, be a "penny" helping the "pounds" if one uses the "right" hashtags.  That said, I do think that the points have been made regarding sorting, linking to other social media platforms and the user interface, in general are important.  

I sometimes wonder why I hung around because Steemit is so hostile to someone who has no technical background and even less inclination.  On reflection, it was because of other interfaces, and now, it's because of @steempress.  This brings me to the matter of communities.  Personally, I have an eclectic range of interests, not all of which I write about, but which I might read and/or follow.  Being pigeonholed into one or other community is a distraction and confusing.  I admit that I've mostly ignored/avoided beta.steemit.com for this reason.

Tuppence worth from someone who's outside the typical Steemit demographic, but who's heading towards the three year mark on the platform.

I have mentioned it several times before that it would be good if some of the Steem front-ends (like Steempeak, eSteem and Busy) would build in the ability to auto-share new posts to Twitter with the capability to add predefined hashtags and shorten the links before posting to Twitter. 

I did not think of it until reading this post but if a (perhaps Steem based) link shortening service was used then a bunch of analytical data could be gathered via it alone.

Anyway, just an idea that I thought worth sharing, 

I like the line of thinking here. Trying to reward posts more closely based on how many people actually view/read them is a great step in the right direction.