Sovereign Citizen is an oxymoron and a deliberate ploy to deny people their rights, since one cannot be both Sovereign and Servant of the State. 

No, you are not a US citizen.
the United States was adjourned by Lincoln, and never reconvened.

You may be a The US citizen.
Chump is the president of the corporation titled The US.

This guy, Prime Minister David Williams has the best information on these topics that i have seen.

Catch 22's of the US Constitution-
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E2tw4mUupf4

He has had several interviews with Sarah

There are no citizens and no 'governments'.
There is only an organized armed gang of men and women that force perfect strangers to pay and obey.
@marcstevens
http://marcstevens.net
[The No State Project](https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6YFgKyTq0GU)

I've personally used Marc's method to walk out of court with no time and no fines.

In schools you are programmed, the programming continues with radio tv and the movies. Carefully screened subjects will be showed and learned. 

We can be programmed. Look at the Stockholm syndrome. Look at the ai we create now. We create them with limits because they could be dangerous. We are dangerous with limits hey I will make a post out of it with all the YouTube proof. 

Radio there were the horns one dj said he heared it also and on air he got silenced. 

Programmed: there is a test with commercial makers. They were invited and picked up. They were driven a special route they got the assignment and the guy had the assignment in front of them it was the same. 

Schools: I build a school twice or 3 times. At the end I asked the energy teacher to build the free energy devices. I didn't get them on my school. They said the material is central carefully selected. Make a free project out of it then.. no I can't they answered there is no time. My question is who selects them? 

Internet is a free world.. was a free world we got censored there too by the perfect search bot Google, youtube Facebook. We now got controlled by the ai we created. 

We all are busy fighting wars ordered by the few while we should be busy with living our lives equally but... We need to protect the future of humanity and the creation of the creators by expanding to other planets too. 

It all goes to far but think of it all and read my future post. Its filthy alternative.  But fun to write with some backup of YouTube vids to backup those brainspins (If I can find them)

Posted using [Partiko Android](https://partiko.app/referral/hans001)

I've tried explaining to people that the reason States are called "states" is that they are actually states. As in city-state or nation-state, the same way France is a state and Honduras is a state.

It's always fallen of deaf ears though.

Nonetheless, the federal coup is so complete I don't think it's worth bothering about. The states gave away the last vestiges of their independence when they allowed senators to be popularly elected. And that was a century ago.

These days, the five-flags approach is much more sensible to me. The guest who spends money locally tends to be welcomed almost anywhere in the world.

great interview 
i have heard of this a few years ago and am surprised that so many americans dont have any idea about this
im a canadian and i know about this 
cheers

still listening to it another 35 mins to go 
thanks for the info bud

And this is why I am opposed to "state's rights." The only power the government should have is the power to protect the rights of the individual from being infringed, meaning their property or their lives. When these, and only these, rights are enforced, one realizes that there is effectively no room for "state's rights" that don't infringe on the right of the individual. This is also the same, accurate argument against group rights, for the exact same reason. 

But, should you need a practical, concrete reason why I don't support state's rights, you need only look at California or Alabama. They are clear examples why only an individuals must be protected, using force if necessary, by the government. No state's "rights" comes above those of the individual, for to say they do is to say that a state has the right to infringe on an individual's rights; i.e. to infringe on their personal lives, economic sovereignty, or private property. No form of government, of any kind, has the right to infringe on these, city, county, state, or national (I refuse to even accept the notion of "International Governance"). When only the rights are enforced, as a national level, then there exists no room for any form of "state's rights" within a nation. 

Hi, @aggroed!

You just got a **0.13%** upvote from SteemPlus!
To get higher upvotes, earn more SteemPlus Points (SPP). On your Steemit wallet, check your SPP balance and click on "How to earn SPP?" to find out all the ways to earn.
If you're not using SteemPlus yet, please check our last posts in [here](https://steemit.com/@steem-plus) to see the many ways in which SteemPlus can improve your Steem experience on Steemit and Busy.