an unreasonable and odd understanding of the original work with the non-original. by aguess

View this thread on: hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com

story · @aguess · Sep 22 '17

$0.42

an unreasonable and odd understanding of the original work with the non-original.

***an objective understanding of work at steemit.com***

sorry before I have to tell stories and ask the steemit. sorry if i'm too to force in writing and tell it here, but this is the right way to ask all that way about the tricks and works that are genuine and pure from the work of someone who has used this steemit.

my question is short to steemit and the party who has been playing in this steemit for those who can answer ..?

1. do we have to write our post work to be good and pure with our own work, ...?
2. whether here we must take from the work of others ....?
3. are we here simply by taking the source of the work of others ...?
4. Is the result of our post just like a waste that is worthless ..?
5. do we have to pay first to the curator if to get upvote a lot ....?
6. whether in steemit this is just for kamoplase just with regular post ...?
7. Is here a place to earn money alone or just to fabricate it ...?
8. whether in steemit this must have a new community just we get upvote that much ...?
9. whether we should get acquainted with the new curator after that we succeed in this steemit ....?
10. how can we get upvote results that many and good ...?
11. how is the assessment of the original post by stealing or using the source of the other party ...?
12. is here we should be more active in posting articles of our work ...?
13. are we here just for investment in order to avoid state tax ...?
14. how is the attitude of steemit to service user of this steemit application ...?
15. Should our writing be completely okjektif and raw ...?
16. I see in some posts from some users of this steemit, sometimes the photo and his writing just that but the post is too much get upvote.
17. if our postings are not properly rated, then what should be to make the user steemit with his outstanding work ,,,,?
18.what in this steemit we should steal and cheat against everything ..?
19. if it is true that I am asking here is not included for semunya then what should you do ..

***the conclusion:***
I'm sorry to see that there are some posts with amazing works but only get a very unfavorable assessment, so I can analyze the progam of this steemit application, I want to predict it, maybe this steemit will last only about 3 or 4 years , if the way it is like this and steemit will be lost and defeated by new applications with the rules that are not cheating and with fellow help to his Cs it.

the fact that I see here only live in a grouped way alone regardless of other people's work best and useful and if this is true so for me is really strange ..

warning for those of you who see it does not need to answer the questions I make, you just ask your heart alone ,,

all thanks to Steemit, and I apologize to all parties steemit also if I am too talkative, but my reason is just for the regulation in steemit is better and better on the assessment of the work of others ...

by. @aguess. forever

<center>![](https://steemitimages.com/DQmY4FKAbCDn519PNhCzYmWePkmASX3kjkEUwpD8UWsTema/image.png)</center>

👍 teukumukhlis, aguess, rahmadi, bilqis07, simonpeter35, steemfuad

`author`	aguess
`permlink`	an-unreasonable-and-odd-understanding-of-the-original-work-with-the-non-original
`category`	story
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["story","steemit","writting","truth","world"],"users":["aguess"],"image":["https://steemitimages.com/DQmY4FKAbCDn519PNhCzYmWePkmASX3kjkEUwpD8UWsTema/image.png"],"app":"steemit/0.1","format":"markdown"}
`created`	2017-09-22 11:04:18
`last_update`	2017-09-22 11:04:18
`depth`	0
`children`	7
`last_payout`	2017-09-29 11:04:18
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.355 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.061 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	3,028
`author_reputation`	1,597,673,142,913
`root_title`	"an unreasonable and odd understanding of the original work with the non-original."
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	15,606,773
`net_rshares`	146,030,200,401
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (6)

voter	rshares	pct
teukumukhlis	111,744,054,714	100%
rahmadi	8,423,277,170	100%
aguess	25,066,183,748	100%
simonpeter35	197,070,801	100%
bilqis07	543,758,800	100%
steemfuad	55,855,168	100%

@arfa07 · Sep 22 '17

$0.09

what that an unreasonable and odd understanding of the original work with the non-original @aguess?

👍 aguess, rahmadi, arfa07

`author`	arfa07
`permlink`	re-aguess-an-unreasonable-and-odd-understanding-of-the-original-work-with-the-non-original-20170922t154237457z
`category`	story
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["story"],"users":["aguess"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-09-22 15:42:42
`last_update`	2017-09-22 15:42:42
`depth`	1
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2017-09-29 15:42:42
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.083 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.009 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	99
`author_reputation`	4,659,278,429,477
`root_title`	"an unreasonable and odd understanding of the original work with the non-original."
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	15,628,299
`net_rshares`	32,337,594,511
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (3)

voter	rshares	pct
rahmadi	8,294,349,459	100%
aguess	22,588,669,116	100%
arfa07	1,454,575,936	100%

@aguess · Sep 22 '17

$0.07

yes thank you, because still confused with the way and trick my common sense thinking.

👍 aguess

`author`	aguess
`permlink`	re-arfa07-re-aguess-an-unreasonable-and-odd-understanding-of-the-original-work-with-the-non-original-20170922t165843520z
`category`	story
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["story"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-09-22 16:58:45
`last_update`	2017-09-22 16:58:45
`depth`	2
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2017-09-29 16:58:45
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.066 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	86
`author_reputation`	1,597,673,142,913
`root_title`	"an unreasonable and odd understanding of the original work with the non-original."
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	15,634,541
`net_rshares`	23,467,117,360
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
aguess	0 B		23,467,117,360	100%

@rahmadi · Sep 22 '17

$0.09

really post

👍 aguess, rahmadi

`author`	rahmadi
`permlink`	re-aguess-an-unreasonable-and-odd-understanding-of-the-original-work-with-the-non-original-20170922t154357729z
`category`	story
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["story"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-09-22 15:44:03
`last_update`	2017-09-22 15:44:03
`depth`	1
`children`	2
`last_payout`	2017-09-29 15:44:03
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.078 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.009 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	11
`author_reputation`	1,701,799,858,439
`root_title`	"an unreasonable and odd understanding of the original work with the non-original."
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	15,628,405
`net_rshares`	31,087,592,778
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (2)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
rahmadi	0 B		8,122,445,843	100%
aguess	0 B		22,965,146,935	100%

@aguess · Sep 22 '17

$0.07

yes of course it is mr. @rahmadi

👍 aguess

`author`	aguess
`permlink`	re-rahmadi-re-aguess-an-unreasonable-and-odd-understanding-of-the-original-work-with-the-non-original-20170922t165950991z
`category`	story
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["story"],"users":["rahmadi"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-09-22 16:59:51
`last_update`	2017-09-22 16:59:51
`depth`	2
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2017-09-29 16:59:51
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.068 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	32
`author_reputation`	1,597,673,142,913
`root_title`	"an unreasonable and odd understanding of the original work with the non-original."
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	15,634,648
`net_rshares`	23,969,087,784
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
aguess	0 B		23,969,087,784	100%

@aguess · Sep 22 '17

$0.06

you may not yet understand the more confusing matters of my thinking Mr. @ rahmadi,

👍 aguess

`author`	aguess
`permlink`	re-aguess-re-rahmadi-re-aguess-an-unreasonable-and-odd-understanding-of-the-original-work-with-the-non-original-20170922t170154040z
`category`	story
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["story"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-09-22 17:01:54
`last_update`	2017-09-22 17:01:54
`depth`	3
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2017-09-29 17:01:54
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.062 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	83
`author_reputation`	1,597,673,142,913
`root_title`	"an unreasonable and odd understanding of the original work with the non-original."
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	15,634,826
`net_rshares`	22,086,698,691
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
aguess	0 B		22,086,698,691	100%

@sarahs · Sep 22 '17

all are valid points

👍 mimran, sarahs, imrececen, jamiee

`author`	sarahs
`permlink`	re-aguess-an-unreasonable-and-odd-understanding-of-the-original-work-with-the-non-original-20170922t110816591z
`category`	story
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["story"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-09-22 11:08:30
`last_update`	2017-09-22 11:08:30
`depth`	1
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2017-09-29 11:08:30
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	20
`author_reputation`	561,743,564,136
`root_title`	"an unreasonable and odd understanding of the original work with the non-original."
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	15,607,043
`net_rshares`	3,116,201,338
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (4)

voter	rshares	pct
sarahs	829,827,733	100%
mimran	934,280,051	100%
imrececen	690,554,539	100%
jamiee	661,539,015	100%

@aguess · Sep 22 '17

$0.09

all are valid these points according to you or according to others ..

👍 aguess, rahmadi

`author`	aguess
`permlink`	re-sarahs-re-aguess-an-unreasonable-and-odd-understanding-of-the-original-work-with-the-non-original-20170922t143924899z
`category`	story
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["story"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-09-22 14:39:24
`last_update`	2017-09-22 14:39:24
`depth`	2
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2017-09-29 14:39:24
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.090 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.003 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	69
`author_reputation`	1,597,673,142,913
`root_title`	"an unreasonable and odd understanding of the original work with the non-original."
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	15,622,682
`net_rshares`	33,016,725,975
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (2)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
rahmadi	0 B		7,950,542,227	100%
aguess	0 B		25,066,183,748	100%