I guess you are buddy from Agorise on Telegram?  We need to make Bitshares more understandable, there should be a team devoted to this.  Even a dedicated company doing consultancy on Bitshares would be flourishing.  That is the **ONLY** thing Bitshares need, marketcap would go x50 in no time.  (And i would enter the 'nouveau riche' :-)). 
I would love to help, i am a techie, but Bitshares maybe is too much, it is just everything, where do we start?  I go and check out this Telegram group again where i found you, sounds **VERY** good :-)

my opinion is that if the exchange coin doesn't offer dividends from the fees or revenue share i am not interested. i feel revenueshare coins like KuCoin or COSS is the way forward for these kinds of coins. it gives early investors the chance to get a share of the cake later on.

just my opinion :)

Very nice post, the crypto-bridge price is very interesting.

The main short term reason why BitShares is so low in value is probably from the Bittrex 'de-listing' fiasco, coins pricing is still so heavily reliant on what exchanges they can get on and being removed/suspended from one is not going to be fun for value along with the rumours that comes with that as well.

Thank you for sharing this perspective. That's something I hadn't thought about with cryptobridge and it's relative marketcap. It's definitely a good example of how undervalued Bitshares is. I think 2018 will be a great year for all graphene projects! Onward and upward! I'll continue spreading the good word of BTS.

Yeah, it's both interesting and confusing how bts can have such a low market cap compared to the other ones you mention. 
I guess that a simpler coin to understand is also simpler to hype before a dump.
 
I also think EOS will be a great help for bts, especially because Dan has mentioned it a couple of times on his Medium-blog.
 
But do you think the bitshares DEX can stay independent and KYC-free with all the compliance stuff that's being worked on and that Stan mentioned for the middle chain?

We're still asking anyone who thinks they know, what the difference between OpenLedger DEX and BitShares DEX is?  Who gets paid what?  Why do they BOTH exist?  Are they the same thing?

Until someone, anyone, can explain in detail the differences between them in the amount of detail you'd expect from a 15 minute smartphone review-comparison on Youtube, we'll kindly want nothing to do with anything related to Bitshares.  Just sayin.

Good job

Great article bud, clear and concise position backed by something that is evidently missing in this industry - substance!

I've found the thread that your post has started really interesting.  This is the kind of analysis I would like to see often.  But bitshares it is not so difficult to value.  At least you can see the amount of fees that are being collected.  The difficult thing is that you should value it as a growth-type company.  I do not have that skill and I would like to see someone trying to do a discounted cash flows analysis from some knowledgeable person.

@airbud23 your publication is well explained .. I have a question since I have seen several publications of EOS and still no one has given me an answer .. what benefit will EOS bring to steemit?
and excuse me for deviating what your publication is about ..
but I see that you are informed of this new platform.

Very nice post.  I think the best points you made were boiling down the level of complexity to the efficiency of pricing.  Since bridgecoin is caveman simple to understand it stands to reason that it will trade closer to its fundamental value.  Something like Bitshares on the other hand which demands  some significant interest to understand is much more likely to trade away from its fundamental value.

Nice approach comparing marketcaps of crypto bridge and bitshares. I had never thought about it that way.

i totally agree with you airbud. nice article looking to see more of this. thumbs up

I also believe that bit shares is greatly undervalued bitshares being a dicetralized crypto currency exchage it is realy aweful to see that it has been greatly undervalued and greatly been missplaced but i guess things will now change as palony x has been bought by jp morgan.

BitShare de camino a la luna!!!
Buen trabajo @airbud23.

I think Bitshares is so undervalued for multiple reasons...lack of simplification. It's just so complex (like you said) like an onion with so many layers. I like how you said people don't want to build the highway if they're in the car business. So true. 

Another reason it's undervalued is lack of marketing and people to explain it in a simple way. The de-listing from Bittrex probably played some part. Those are just a few.

Thanks for your thoughts in this article! Haha, I only clicked on you because of your name and picture, because I literally used "Airbud" in an article I wrote yesterday, haha. Turns out your most recent article was about one of my fave cryptos! Nice to meet you :)

Great article airbud...i was shocked to hear that they compared EOS to Bitshares and said why invest..they have no idea what they are talking about...glad you wrote something that they will finally see and wake up...look forward to your future articles on Bitshares..cheers

People must have missed Stan Larimer talking about Bitshares moving onto EOS blockchain for Bitshares 3.0 and how the team is very excited to show what they can do building on top of EOS tech. The FOMO is going to be bad on this one. I agree that Bitshares is complicated. It seems so user friendly to me now after the fact. But when I first downloaded it I was very confused how it all worked. Now 30-40% or my trading happens on Cryptobridge.