https://steemitimages.com/DQmPPoJjdpUCj5yJpcyEXWL4JQy4msY4F4wwimx6GpudeQK/we-re-beautiful-now.jpg

<hr>

<h3>How Do We View Things?</h3>

Do things have objectiveness in and of themselves, except observation, or is observation relative to objectivity?

To answer this, we must always consider the mechanics of observation. The means by which we perceive the material world is the physical senses, and the spectrum for all of those senses varies from one sentient being to another. Therefore, a thing may even be perceived in an infinite range of ways.

However, being thingness is indeterminate, with the exception of observation, does this implicate the observer as the sole source of objectivity? In other words, are there indeterminate things in and of themselves?

<h3>Clarifying The Difference</h3>

If so, what does indeterminate objectiveness aside from the objectifying observer even mean?

Indeterminate objectivity may possibly indicate potentiality. From the traditional philosophy of indeterminism to the modern theory of quantum indeterminacy, a theory has survived the test of time that supposes the Universe is resting, which Kant cited as noumenal until sentience interprets it as phenomenal.

<h3>A Unique Understanding</h3>

Being every sentient being is unique or subjective in one's capability to comprehend, the multiplicity of forces, that on a universal scale neutralise each other, are experienced as variables. It's our finiteness, our inability to observe at all things at once, which provides us with the capability for objectivity.

Let's, for a moment, consider the Universe as all things turned into one. From our point of view, we see the Universe as a collection of spatiotemporal phenomena. However, the Universe itself is unbroken. It has, as some would say, a metaphysical nature to it.

For us, the Universe is absolute power, all-powerful in its capability. But, despite this, the Universe is forever at rest.

<h3>Misinterpretations</h3>

The very division religionists see between themselves and God, scientists see between themselves and Nature. With time and the use of semantics, we've taken the science of God and have refashioned it into a science of the Earth.

Us as a species have taken something that was once sacred and made it frequent and common. The scientist, using all his research, has denounced the religious of the past as nothing more than myth and superstitions. Whereas failing to grasp those myths and superstitions are the very groundwork on that his, or her, profession rests.

http://www.azquotes.com/picture-quotes/quote-science-makes-people-reach-selflessly-for-truth-and-objectivity-it-teaches-people-to-lise-meitner-57-31-82.jpg