Love that book and those videos, and have been meaning to do some posts about them. I guess they are in order now, and we've given a beginning and organization of their presentation. (It seemed so huge to me and I didn't know how to start.)

Shore massively shares in any merits (G-d willing) of my beginning to keep... The different time scales between science and Torah were a major stumbling block for me, so I just ignored it and kept searching outside for years. So though the colours and planetary diameters and angular momenta and so many other hidden secrets in their words fascinate me and solidify the data *and* faith, I'm most thankful for his reconciliation of the 7 days with 7000 years and 13.8 billion years. Anyways, that's a whole story and some other charts...!

But to address your question, it's cause the guy in the thread wasn't doing it right. I think he used wavelengths rather than frequency, and also set his graph wrong.

The following is all taken from Shore's book that you cite, and it seems correct to me.

Here are the names and values of the basic set of colours. (He also does an extended set, as well as several other versions.)

https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmef4wM6bF3tCC7t6YY7DSwDT1oCxQbanrKpieuio5TkW4/image.png

Here are the wavelengths and frequencies.

https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNinyBRUeo5xHGKKYeJ1z2tsXW9WHXLLqDCCMT9K7crQb/image.png

In the graph below, wave frequency is on the Y axis, and he selects the midpoint of the frequency range for a given colour. Hebrew names and gematria values for the colours on the X axis.

https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmfXca3u8dqiwheC6QGd4vvByRhppraqmCvVEDCdbThKgT/image.png

Together they yield a .99992, or essentially a 1.0 correlation. This means both Hebrew and the frequencies of colour in nature, both "languages," are saying the same thing regarding the colours. If you plotted the Fahrenheit scale on Y and Celsius on X, and marked a few temperatures of say, water at freezing and boiling points, and say the human body temperature, you'd get a perfect straight line, or another 1.0 correlation. This happens because both scales are observing the same data, and saying the same thing in two different "languages."

If you changed even one Hebrew letter in any of the words, or changed the frequency of a colour in nature (lol,) then the graph wouldn't be a straight line which would mean a less than 1.0 correlation.

Since these words appear written in the 3300 year old Torah, we also must explore *when* wavelengths and frequencies were understood by science! We must ask about the statistical (im)probability of 3 words, 5 words, 7, etc., yielding a 1.0 correlation to the actual things they describe in nature! And we must ask about how and from who the ancient Hebrews acquired the idea that Creation was *spoken* into existence. Etc... So much to say on this, and it's just 1 example! B"H, what a genius He is! Shore's pretty darn good too, lol!

Resteemed!

Otherwise, b'simcha, have a shabbat shalom with good connections, good food, rest, and study!

Wow, that is a heavy book!  There is no question that the Bible is a divinely inspired book, with more information about how the world works than the priests of modern scientism can ever offer us.   Bless the Most High!  May you have a restful Shabbat!  @ironshield

very strong post. I would debate you on some points but I know you aren't schooled in Redneck Math so I'll leave you alone.

exelente amigo las matematicas no se pelan. la onda solar es perfecta salidos feliz fin de semana

pretty cool although I'm not good with math lol ;oP