Viewing a response to: @mikeyb/re-bitcalm-why-steemit-is-a-great-platform-for-journalists-20160801t170137557z
I think steemit can already serve as a good platform for a portfolio, but upvotes (traffic) aren't a good metric at the moment because it's not clear whether people are upvoting because the content is good, because of self-interest (curation rewards), or bots (including the bot by steemd, a whale).
author | bitcalm |
---|---|
permlink | re-mikeyb-re-bitcalm-why-steemit-is-a-great-platform-for-journalists-20160801t172302664z |
category | steemit |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steemit"]} |
created | 2016-08-01 17:23:03 |
last_update | 2016-08-01 17:23:03 |
depth | 2 |
children | 1 |
last_payout | 2016-08-31 21:03:57 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 299 |
author_reputation | 24,919,530,803,138 |
root_title | "Why steemit is a great platform for journalists" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 539,612 |
net_rshares | 0 |
True
author | mikeyb |
---|---|
permlink | re-bitcalm-re-mikeyb-re-bitcalm-why-steemit-is-a-great-platform-for-journalists-20160801t201228930z |
category | steemit |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steemit"]} |
created | 2016-08-01 20:12:27 |
last_update | 2016-08-01 20:12:27 |
depth | 3 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-08-31 21:03:57 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 4 |
author_reputation | 91,639,379,830 |
root_title | "Why steemit is a great platform for journalists" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 543,781 |
net_rshares | 0 |