Morality is often separated into these two camps.  Deontological ethics are generally considered to be based around rules, where actions are right or wrong in-and-of themselves. Whereas consequentialist ethics care about the outcomes of an action, and its repercussions, in terms of some measurable value such as utility or harm. 

Where do you stand?

Do you think they're mutually exclusive?

Is the dichotomy too simplistic?

Do you support an alternative category such as virtue ethics?

Do you have particular problems with one or the other?