create account

Hanlon's Razor, not so very sharp by builderofcastles

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com
· @builderofcastles · (edited)
$7.64
Hanlon's Razor, not so very sharp
<img alt="Hanlons Razor" src="https://images.hive.blog/DQma45wPXhCVRifRFDZDXXUukyjX8RvYDC7iZFy76f5SrbY/HanlonsRazor.png">

Hanlon's Razor:
> "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." 

> Once is happenstance
Twice is coincidence
Thrice is enemy action

<center><img  alt="- - - - - - - " src="https://images.hive.blog/DQmXew34of9kAYtbc4N3afKqGa9a2aNZZEurE9uKgYLgisP/HorizontalRule2.png"></center>

Hanlon's Razor seems like a good, middle path to take when dealing with people.
And if you are dealing with neighors, it may be a good position to keep.

However, when dealing with govern-cement, and positions of power, it is probably a better plan to say

## Never attribute an action of a politician to stupidity, it is most likely malice.

<img alt="Bushy and Hitlery are clearly Psychopaths" src="https://images.hive.blog/DQmWRggiLTC7cdKgvvWpoBhiLndThYKkXCr5J9bH3SG5g5F/Psychopaths.jpeg">


This is because the higher you go in a pyramid structure, the more likely you are to be dealing with a narcissists, psychopath or sociopath.  These people care as much for you as you care for your television.  The chances of them passing a fair and balanced law is just about nil.

And what have we seen with every suspected terror type act (false flag)?  That they vote to restrict peoples' rights further.

Each and every time, it is a step towards totalitarianism.

<center><img  alt="- - - - - - - " src="https://images.hive.blog/DQmXew34of9kAYtbc4N3afKqGa9a2aNZZEurE9uKgYLgisP/HorizontalRule2.png"></center>

Stupidity is random.  Like flipping a coin, or rolling a dice:  1,4,6,5,2,1,3,....
Malice is very linear.  Like enemy action, always against you: 1,1,1,1,1,1,1....

And if you look at a graph of what normal people want and what politicians vote for, there is no correlation.  Its like the average voter is ignored completely.

But if you look at things politicians all vote for, more tyranny.  Each and every time.
Also, often in the evening, just before a weekend, just after something big and newsworthy (not the same top the MSM) happened, these politicians will vote, almost unanimously, on something that the normal voter will hate.

So, we can definitely say that that part of Hanlon's Razor "...which is adequately explained by..." as failing. And can easily show, above 90% surety, that politicians are not acting in stupidity, but in malice.

(This does not mean that they are not stupid, but it does mean that their actions are in malice.  And that may be attributed to the people that tell them how to vote.  And that is even worse.)


<center><img  alt="- - - - - - - " src="https://images.hive.blog/DQmXew34of9kAYtbc4N3afKqGa9a2aNZZEurE9uKgYLgisP/HorizontalRule2.png"></center>

Again it all comes down to having narcissists, psychopaths and sociopaths in charge.  Thus we must remove these people from any place or position of power.

The world depends on this.

How can we continue existing when we have people who think that a limited nuclear exchange will end well?

It doesn't matter how well written a constitution is written, with evil people at the helm, evil will be done.  And a system will be formed by psychopaths for psychopaths to have all important elections be between two evils.  Never can there be allowed a race where a normal person might get in charge.  Never can there be allowed a person who runs that is not under control.  (except a few can  be allowed.  The illusion of voting must be maintained, and a few "good" people are useful to say, look, we are not all evil....)

We need to get rid of Hanlon's Razor.  It has been proven false on any large enough scale.

And we need to start testing politicians, running for office, for empathy.
Put them on the spot.  Put them in the hot seat.  In front of the TV cameras and ask them, "list 10 qualities that their opponent has that would make them a good person for the position."

<center><img  alt="- - - - - - - " src="https://images.hive.blog/DQmXew34of9kAYtbc4N3afKqGa9a2aNZZEurE9uKgYLgisP/HorizontalRule2.png"></center>
<center><em>All images in this post are my own original creations.</em></center>
👍  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authorbuilderofcastles
permlinkhanlon-s
categoryhive-110786
json_metadata"{"image":["https://images.hive.blog/DQma45wPXhCVRifRFDZDXXUukyjX8RvYDC7iZFy76f5SrbY/HanlonsRazor.png","https://images.hive.blog/DQmXew34of9kAYtbc4N3afKqGa9a2aNZZEurE9uKgYLgisP/HorizontalRule2.png","https://images.hive.blog/DQmWRggiLTC7cdKgvvWpoBhiLndThYKkXCr5J9bH3SG5g5F/Psychopaths.jpeg"],"app":"hiveblog/0.1","format":"markdown","tags":["sociopaths","psychopaths","narcissists","informationwar","hanlonsrazor"],"description":"The opposite of Hanlon's Razor is more appropriate when dealing with politicians"}"
created2023-03-30 21:04:03
last_update2023-03-30 21:05:33
depth0
children2
last_payout2023-04-06 21:04:03
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value3.820 HBD
curator_payout_value3.816 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length4,133
author_reputation165,731,733,924,855
root_title"Hanlon's Razor, not so very sharp"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id122,121,615
net_rshares13,687,294,881,223
author_curate_reward""
vote details (20)
@deirdyweirdy ·
$0.03
>And we need to start testing politicians, running for office, for empathy.
Put them on the spot. Put them in the hot seat. In front of the TV cameras and ask them, "list 10 qualities that their opponent has that would make them a good person for the position."

If we were in the position to do this, why not rid ourselves entirely of politicians? If we have a constitution, a charter, or some such, why do we need lawmakers and permanent ones at that?
👍  
properties (23)
authordeirdyweirdy
permlinkrsctcr
categoryhive-110786
json_metadata{"app":"hiveblog/0.1"}
created2023-03-30 22:05:15
last_update2023-03-30 22:05:15
depth1
children1
last_payout2023-04-06 22:05:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.016 HBD
curator_payout_value0.016 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length453
author_reputation51,342,054,036,561
root_title"Hanlon's Razor, not so very sharp"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id122,123,210
net_rshares60,687,819,171
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@builderofcastles ·
This is a difficult question.

And it will never really be answered, instead, a shifting of what we elect people for will change.

The simplest happening is two people disagree, so they go to the village elder to settle the dispute.  Both people have to agree that the person they are going to is wiser or smarter AND that they both believe in that person.  And they both believe that the village elder will help.

So, here is a real need.  And a real set of criteria.  And usually this person is the same one used by most of the village.  In a small group, this person is just "known".  In a larger group, people nominate who they think is good, and the group votes for the top person.

In the future, things will be turned on their side.

Elections will be more about getting a certain thing done.

The top people in government (probably not called that any more) will be a group of very wise people that will help others do a project, negotiate a deal or give ideas on doing things better.

But we have several iterations of govern-cement before we get there.
Not that long at all.
properties (22)
authorbuilderofcastles
permlinkrsctr9
categoryhive-110786
json_metadata{"app":"hiveblog/0.1"}
created2023-03-30 22:16:57
last_update2023-03-30 22:16:57
depth2
children0
last_payout2023-04-06 22:16:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,084
author_reputation165,731,733,924,855
root_title"Hanlon's Razor, not so very sharp"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id122,123,460
net_rshares0