![WrongScience.png](https://images.hive.blog/DQmcjqhRCBPJvSBFHUdYAm6a45nhwiABgSLnqfBN79EdGjP/WrongScience.png)

Modern Materialistic Science states that perpetual motion machines can't exist.

When we get a working magnet motor that actually powers things, will Modern Materialistic Science admit that it was wrong?

They should, right?  When a theory is disproven, it should be removed, because that is what the "scientific method" says.  But, will they?

How much disproof is enough disproof?  What is the minimum disproof needed for colleges to throw out the current science text books?

And, what really bothers me is, If an experiment shows that one of science's big laws is wrong, will there be a certain number of "scientists" saying that they did the experiment, and it failed to show the big law as wrong?  Then, how long will it take before the obvious is agreed upon, or will they keep it up until the disproof is buried and no one remembers it?

There is one big problem with these questions, it is no longer in the realm of speculation, there are several things that will be built that will put paid to science being found out as wrong.

<center><img  alt="- - - - - - - " src="https://images.hive.blog/DQmXew34of9kAYtbc4N3afKqGa9a2aNZZEurE9uKgYLgisP/HorizontalRule2.png"></center>
## Perpetual motion machine disproves Laws of Thermodynamics

There are enough over-unity devices out there that the Laws of Thermodynamics should have been thrown in the dust bin.

The Laws of Thermodynamics only seem to hold up in a laboratory, and then, only mostly.  Physicists trying to account for all the energy in a system are continuously running down that last erg to balance the equations.

The thing is, growing plants break these laws all the time.  There is more plant there then all the inputs say should be there.  (this got swept under the rug)

However, the big thing, the one that was said "This CANNOT exist", the perpetual motion machine, will be developed.  There are already magnet motors that spin and spin and spin.  They just don't have much torque to drive anything.  Soon we will solve that issue.  We will have little generators that charge your phone with just magnets that spin and spin.

After we have that item, will Modern Materialistic Science be able to defend the Laws of Thermodynamics?

An item that so blatantly breaks those laws.

<center><img  alt="- - - - - - - " src="https://images.hive.blog/DQmXew34of9kAYtbc4N3afKqGa9a2aNZZEurE9uKgYLgisP/HorizontalRule2.png"></center>
## Things floating in the air disproves Theory of Gravity

Massless objects, which just float in the air, like a brick doesn't.

This is not anti-gravity, but many will latch onto those words.  This is something that shows that gravity, as a result of mass, is complete bunk.

First we will have floating things.  Then we will have something like a forklift, that you can drag around, and elevate an item up to, or down from a shelf.  They will be everywhere.  Everyone will see them, many will play with them.

And quite a few will turn them into a real life hoverboard or a flying car.  Now, there are all kinds of engineering problems to be overcome with these, but we will get that figured out.

The thing is, these items will be clearly electrical, an electric property.  Not mass, or anti-gravity, but a result of varying frequency and voltage in condensors (what is now call capacitors)

There are so many gravitational anomalies all over our planet that the Theory of Gravity should have been thrown out long ago, but these new items will make mincemeat of the theories.  And everyone will know about it.

<center><img  alt="- - - - - - - " src="https://images.hive.blog/DQmXew34of9kAYtbc4N3afKqGa9a2aNZZEurE9uKgYLgisP/HorizontalRule2.png"></center>
## Psychics disprove Theory of Relativity

This will be very controversial.  Modern Materialistic Science has been fighting this for sooooooo long.

Mind over matter.  Premonitions.  Telepathy… Anyone who really looks into this stuff find there is a lot, lot more to it then just parlor tricks.  Now, there are scammers and con-artists for sure, but that doesn't account for the pile of experiences that most people have had.

Like NDEs (near death experiences) called hallucinations by Modern Materialistic Science, however, if you look into the MOUNTAIN of stories you find that there is a lot more there.

And now, aliens will soon be arriving and talking with us.  And we will find that many, many alien races communicate telepathically.  What do we do with this knowledge when we have been told, for a very long time, that psychic powers do not exist?

After this point, Modern Materialistic Science completely collapses.  No one believes in that atheistic, closed minded, shit anymore.

There is so much out there to explore.  The shackles of the this perversion of science will come off, and people will start to see that there is so much more to our reality than we even imagined.

It will be like blind people suddenly discovered color.  Not just a one dimensional jump like B&W -> color, but blind -> B&W -> color.

Modern Materialistic Science will be dropped just like when we went from B&W television to color television to holographic projectors.

<center><img  alt="- - - - - - - " src="https://images.hive.blog/DQmXew34of9kAYtbc4N3afKqGa9a2aNZZEurE9uKgYLgisP/HorizontalRule2.png"></center>

So, all of these things are coming, the question is, will Modern Materialistic Science admit that it was wrong?

There will probably be some professors who profess that they had their eyes opened.  And then they will be fired.

I am expecting the core of Modern Materialistic Science to go down with the ship, never conceding their position on a materialistic universe.  The universities will go down with them.  Crumbling to dust.

The new sciences will be discussed on-line, and the collective additions from many, many people will make this new science very fast growing.  The hierarchy inherit in the old system will be gone.  We will see much more attention placed on facts and findings, then on "hollowed names".  Being a part of the expanding science will be a much better feeling than trying for that top position of having a theory named after you (which requires a lot of developing in secret, closed off from everyone else.)

I am sorry that Modern Materialistic Science is so unscientific.

<center><img  alt="- - - - - - - " src="https://images.hive.blog/DQmXew34of9kAYtbc4N3afKqGa9a2aNZZEurE9uKgYLgisP/HorizontalRule2.png"></center>
<center><em>All images in this post are my own original creations.</em></center>