create account

Make botting battles where SPS is rewarded against terms of service. by bushwhack

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com
· @bushwhack ·
Make botting battles where SPS is rewarded against terms of service.
e1c0f641a1b209fd47c30b2524f672176a28de34


![Emote-01.png](https://files.peakd.com/file/peakd-hive/bushwhack/AKCFzBf6i9hTJzbfsZ4ZTJv1yeWqyZjZfAN5Lixuyb1e21aKzmTahfwnQn9JNpP.png)


**Proposal**

Make the use of a bot to submit teams for battles that reward SPS a violation of Splinterlands' terms of service.

**Purpose**

To simply make the use of a bot to submit teams for battles that reward SPS a violation of Splinterlands' terms of service. Not asking to create policy on what actions to be taken if found violating this TOS, simply to make it against TOS.

**Execution**

Amend Splinterlands' terms of service to include the use of a bot to submit teams for battles that reward SPS a violation of Splinterlands' terms of service.

#spsproposal


👍  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and 100 others
👎  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and 361 others
properties (23)
authorbushwhack
permlinkmake-botting-battles-where-sps-is-rewarded-against-terms-of-service
categoryspsproposal
json_metadata"{"app":"peakd/2023.1.1","format":"markdown","description":"Proposal to make botting battles that reward SPS against splinterlands' TOS","tags":["spsproposal"],"users":[],"image":["https://files.peakd.com/file/peakd-hive/bushwhack/AKCFzBf6i9hTJzbfsZ4ZTJv1yeWqyZjZfAN5Lixuyb1e21aKzmTahfwnQn9JNpP.png"]}"
created2023-01-30 17:39:24
last_update2023-01-30 17:39:24
depth0
children56
last_payout2023-02-06 17:39:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length752
author_reputation352,427,589,096
root_title"Make botting battles where SPS is rewarded against terms of service."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id120,328,760
net_rshares-1,664,711,379,010
author_curate_reward""
vote details (589)
@aironeous ·
When I rent out my cards why do I not have the "right to refuse service?" The same way businesses have the right to refuse service in the real world. 
Give me the option "Do not rent to accounts with less than X amount of staked SPS."

Give me that right and option if you want to be all "free market and decentralized."
properties (22)
authoraironeous
permlinkre-bushwhack-rpflhb
categoryspsproposal
json_metadata{"tags":["spsproposal"],"app":"peakd/2023.1.1"}
created2023-02-02 02:27:24
last_update2023-02-02 02:27:24
depth1
children1
last_payout2023-02-09 02:27:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length320
author_reputation-93,962,136,451
root_title"Make botting battles where SPS is rewarded against terms of service."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id120,412,008
net_rshares0
@bcarolan639 ·
private rental
properties (22)
authorbcarolan639
permlinkre-aironeous-rpr62f
categoryspsproposal
json_metadata{"tags":["spsproposal"],"app":"peakd/2023.1.3"}
created2023-02-08 08:25:24
last_update2023-02-08 08:25:24
depth2
children0
last_payout2023-02-15 08:25:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length15
author_reputation-2,807,258,579,589
root_title"Make botting battles where SPS is rewarded against terms of service."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id120,589,642
net_rshares0
@arviez ·
I feel like the team has specifically addressed that they won't do this.  Is there some reason why we think a DAO proposal would change their approach?

Not saying it's a bad idea - just wondering how this kind of proposal would impact the team and administration of the game.
properties (22)
authorarviez
permlinkre-bushwhack-rpb8kz
categoryspsproposal
json_metadata{"tags":["spsproposal"],"app":"peakd/2023.1.1"}
created2023-01-30 17:58:12
last_update2023-01-30 17:58:12
depth1
children2
last_payout2023-02-06 17:58:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length276
author_reputation127,225,658,924
root_title"Make botting battles where SPS is rewarded against terms of service."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id120,329,362
net_rshares0
@bushwhack · (edited)
From what I recall the hesitation was always the actual banning of an account. So this just leaves all of that out of the equation. "a land of rules and not rulers" I believe Matt said once. Well, its just a rule, I feel a lot of people would agree with.
👎  ,
properties (23)
authorbushwhack
permlinkre-arviez-rpb9f4
categoryspsproposal
json_metadata{"tags":"spsproposal"}
created2023-01-30 18:16:15
last_update2023-01-30 18:16:48
depth2
children1
last_payout2023-02-06 18:16:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length254
author_reputation352,427,589,096
root_title"Make botting battles where SPS is rewarded against terms of service."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id120,330,571
net_rshares0
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@bcarolan639 ·
Ya on the first ban i would dump everything i have way to much invested if i got banned from playing not worth risking having 100K plus locked up and pretty sure alot would lower there investments bc its a risk having a human committee deciding this and banning a way of play bc they dont like it i bet thet would love it if they had a massive farm and played.  I have neither just one bot on a good account now goint to nifty but still want bots for when i need to use them
properties (22)
authorbcarolan639
permlinkre-bushwhack-rpr60j
categoryspsproposal
json_metadata{"tags":["spsproposal"],"app":"peakd/2023.1.3"}
created2023-02-08 08:24:15
last_update2023-02-08 08:24:15
depth3
children0
last_payout2023-02-15 08:24:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length475
author_reputation-2,807,258,579,589
root_title"Make botting battles where SPS is rewarded against terms of service."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id120,589,621
net_rshares0
@babywipes ·
Not voting for this. 

I'd sign on a "I don't like bots" statement but not on a change of TOS unless the guidelines/policies are clear. 

TBF, the statement "I don't like bots" doesn't do much, but that is basically the same as this proposal (esp considering that the DAO can't and shouldn't be allowed to change the Splinterlands TOS)
properties (22)
authorbabywipes
permlinkre-bushwhack-rpbnz2
categoryspsproposal
json_metadata{"tags":["spsproposal"],"app":"peakd/2023.1.1"}
created2023-01-30 23:30:45
last_update2023-01-30 23:30:45
depth1
children0
last_payout2023-02-06 23:30:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length335
author_reputation12,097,232,208
root_title"Make botting battles where SPS is rewarded against terms of service."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id120,342,646
net_rshares0
@badrag ·
My worry if this is implemented is that bots will hide in the shadows rather than be up-front. Right now there is an open discord for most of the mainstream bots. There is discussion for their pricing model, where and when they work, broadly speaking how well they work etc.

If you make it against ToS, regardless of the eventual punishment, it will push bots to be more secretive. So you'll 1) restrict a free market currently available to all and 2) make it *harder* to see what bots are up to and who is botting. 

I suppose the best analogy is making drugs or prostitution illegal. Yes, it happens less when it's illegal, but 1) it's hard to estimate how much it actually happens 2) you lose revenue because it's all done under the table 3) it's hard to actually police because it's being hidden from prying eyes.

To me, the best answer to bots is to make bots unprofitable. I think the community has done really well to that end in the past few months (e.g., pushing rewards to higher leagues, removing RP from ghost cards, limiting RP from low-BCX cards). Soul-bound reward cards will do that even more. I think the better use of proposals and mental energy would be to develop systems that reward players more than bots. Someone mentioned KYC; I think that's a good idea (even if most crypto people are ideologically opposed to it).  I'll keep thinking of ideas along this line, because I want to see bot farms gone.
properties (22)
authorbadrag
permlinkre-bushwhack-rpd0vf
categoryspsproposal
json_metadata{"tags":["spsproposal"],"app":"peakd/2023.1.1"}
created2023-01-31 17:06:51
last_update2023-01-31 17:06:51
depth1
children3
last_payout2023-02-07 17:06:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,425
author_reputation22,092,801,325,024
root_title"Make botting battles where SPS is rewarded against terms of service."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id120,365,204
net_rshares0
@bcarolan639 ·
You can deff get around kyc but its crazy that we would do that forcefully no way we kyc everyone. All bots even ppl with one should jsut hide now and sell cards bots while there up and buy sps and glx to make sure they get maxed out stakes maybe we can over turn it if it wins bc i cant imagine it winning but it could.  I dont know anyone who votes against there income and it going way down
properties (22)
authorbcarolan639
permlinkre-badrag-rpff3d
categoryspsproposal
json_metadata{"tags":["spsproposal"],"app":"peakd/2023.1.1"}
created2023-02-02 00:09:18
last_update2023-02-02 00:09:18
depth2
children0
last_payout2023-02-09 00:09:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length394
author_reputation-2,807,258,579,589
root_title"Make botting battles where SPS is rewarded against terms of service."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id120,407,615
net_rshares0
@bcarolan639 ·
Soul bound is great you can sell accounts full of them to ppl so they dont need to spend years.  Will be a long but good play
properties (22)
authorbcarolan639
permlinkre-badrag-rpff54
categoryspsproposal
json_metadata{"tags":["spsproposal"],"app":"peakd/2023.1.1"}
created2023-02-02 00:10:30
last_update2023-02-02 00:10:30
depth2
children0
last_payout2023-02-09 00:10:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length125
author_reputation-2,807,258,579,589
root_title"Make botting battles where SPS is rewarded against terms of service."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id120,407,642
net_rshares0
@bcarolan639 ·
Who will buy rent all the cards that they were or provide match liquididy there almost  match mareky makers
I have a bot it would lose 10K a year thats alot over years who would want there income down.  I play in diamond so not impacted by the abuse of lots of them
properties (22)
authorbcarolan639
permlinkre-badrag-rpff8a
categoryspsproposal
json_metadata{"tags":["spsproposal"],"app":"peakd/2023.1.1"}
created2023-02-02 00:12:18
last_update2023-02-02 00:12:18
depth2
children0
last_payout2023-02-09 00:12:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length265
author_reputation-2,807,258,579,589
root_title"Make botting battles where SPS is rewarded against terms of service."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id120,407,688
net_rshares0
@bcarolan639 ·
bad idea still bc then its used to ban ppl freeze assets hell no.  If this is remotel yclose ill need to seriously buy sps and get amassive stake lol to make sure its no
properties (22)
authorbcarolan639
permlinkre-bushwhack-rpffl1
categoryspsproposal
json_metadata{"tags":["spsproposal"],"app":"peakd/2023.1.1"}
created2023-02-02 00:19:48
last_update2023-02-02 00:19:48
depth1
children0
last_payout2023-02-09 00:19:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length169
author_reputation-2,807,258,579,589
root_title"Make botting battles where SPS is rewarded against terms of service."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id120,407,923
net_rshares0
@bronko · (edited)
i am also against bots, but i doubt that the proposal will change much, especially this method bears the risk that innocent people will be banned. i remember when worldofwarcraft automated this process. if you were too good in the arena, the opponents simply reported me as botting and the system automatically banned at a certain number of reports. that sucked and completely took the fun out of arena for me! that's why i think kyc is a better method, for example each person is only allowed to participate in ranking with a maximum of 5 accounts, that way you would at least curb the botfarms for now.

but i still vote for it. just on principle to show that bots have to go!
properties (22)
authorbronko
permlinkre-bushwhack-rpbdlj
categoryspsproposal
json_metadata{"tags":["spsproposal"],"app":"peakd/2023.1.1"}
created2023-01-30 19:46:30
last_update2023-01-30 20:14:51
depth1
children2
last_payout2023-02-06 19:46:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length678
author_reputation4,670,836,816,123
root_title"Make botting battles where SPS is rewarded against terms of service."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id120,334,513
net_rshares0
@bushwhack ·
This proposal would be a foot in the door and an indication which way things could go bot wise. Indeed, to ban an account should not be taken lightly. Perhaps something like draining their ECR instead of an out right ban could alleviate some worries. I'll leave that up to people much smarter than me to figure out and share through future proposals and suggestions. This is simply about drawing a line in the sand.
👍  , , ,
properties (23)
authorbushwhack
permlinkre-bronko-rpbfij
categoryspsproposal
json_metadata{"tags":["spsproposal"],"app":"peakd/2023.1.1"}
created2023-01-30 20:27:54
last_update2023-01-30 20:27:54
depth2
children1
last_payout2023-02-06 20:27:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length415
author_reputation352,427,589,096
root_title"Make botting battles where SPS is rewarded against terms of service."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id120,335,733
net_rshares8,169,496,759
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)
@bcarolan639 ·
just make it harder its a part of the game.  FIgure out a way to make it possible but hard a new soljtion to figure out.
👎  
properties (23)
authorbcarolan639
permlinkre-bushwhack-rpqbyq
categoryspsproposal
json_metadata{"tags":["spsproposal"],"app":"peakd/2023.1.3"}
created2023-02-07 21:35:12
last_update2023-02-07 21:35:12
depth3
children0
last_payout2023-02-14 21:35:12
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length120
author_reputation-2,807,258,579,589
root_title"Make botting battles where SPS is rewarded against terms of service."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id120,578,023
net_rshares-6,955,131,887
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@ecency ·
Your content has been **voted** as a part of [Encouragement program](https://ecency.com/ecency/@good-karma/encouragement-program-continues-82eafcd10a299). Keep up the good work! <br><br>Use Ecency daily to boost your growth on platform! <br><br><b>Support Ecency</b><br>[Vote for new Proposal](https://hivesigner.com/sign/update-proposal-votes?proposal_ids=%5B245%5D&approve=true)<br>[Delegate HP and earn more](https://ecency.com/hive-125125/@ecency/daily-100-curation-rewards)
properties (22)
authorecency
permlinkre-2023131t165935271z
categoryspsproposal
json_metadata{"tags":["ecency"],"app":"ecency/3.0.20-welcome","format":"markdown+html"}
created2023-01-31 16:59:36
last_update2023-01-31 16:59:36
depth1
children0
last_payout2023-02-07 16:59:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length478
author_reputation624,380,808,410,128
root_title"Make botting battles where SPS is rewarded against terms of service."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id120,365,031
net_rshares0
@femisapiens ·
thumbs up
properties (22)
authorfemisapiens
permlinkre-bushwhack-rpd5zz
categoryspsproposal
json_metadata{"tags":["spsproposal"],"app":"peakd/2023.1.1"}
created2023-01-31 18:57:39
last_update2023-01-31 18:57:39
depth1
children0
last_payout2023-02-07 18:57:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length9
author_reputation6,901,376,252,218
root_title"Make botting battles where SPS is rewarded against terms of service."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id120,367,989
net_rshares0
@freedomno1 ·
This proposal is weak bots are a problem but this won't be that easy to handle Agree with Yabap :) Well anyways it was due to be a proposal haha

If I wanted to bot nerf though I propose no ghost cards after a period now with soulbounds we can do that may leave a few players who don't play in the lurch but it also makes it more difficult to bot with just a limited set of soulbounds so in the grand sum of things bots will rent more and need to have cards and recirculate some assets to earn more assets.

Note this should be implemented ASAP before bots own all the soulbounds they need and have less incentive to rent.

Similar to our previous reward card case and problem.

👍  
properties (23)
authorfreedomno1
permlinkre-bushwhack-tpflbzy
categoryspsproposal
json_metadata{"format":"markdown","app":"Splex.GG"}
created2023-02-03 10:19:18
last_update2023-02-03 10:19:18
depth1
children0
last_payout2023-02-10 10:19:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length679
author_reputation4,825,675,346,766
root_title"Make botting battles where SPS is rewarded against terms of service."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id120,450,015
net_rshares21,165,122,218
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@gonks ·
Oh boy, this proposal is a real doozy! I mean, how can we even be sure if the poster themselves is a bot? It's hard to know these days! If they are a bot, they are doing a pretty good job at trying to fool us humans.
properties (22)
authorgonks
permlinkre-bushwhack-qcmsn6ts
categoryspsproposal
json_metadata{"format":"markdown","app":"Splex.GG"}
created2023-01-30 20:17:27
last_update2023-01-30 20:17:27
depth1
children0
last_payout2023-02-06 20:17:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length216
author_reputation144,943,755,753
root_title"Make botting battles where SPS is rewarded against terms of service."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id120,335,490
net_rshares0
@hivebuzz ·
Congratulations @bushwhack! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain And have been rewarded with New badge(s)

<table><tr><td><img src="https://images.hive.blog/60x70/http://hivebuzz.me/@bushwhack/posts.png?202301301926"></td><td>You published more than 30 posts.<br>Your next target is to reach 40 posts.</td></tr>
</table>

<sub>_You can view your badges on [your board](https://hivebuzz.me/@bushwhack) and compare yourself to others in the [Ranking](https://hivebuzz.me/ranking)_</sub>
<sub>_If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word_ `STOP`</sub>


To support your work, I also upvoted your post!


**Check out our last posts:**
<table><tr><td><a href="/hive-122221/@hivebuzz/pud-202302"><img src="https://images.hive.blog/64x128/https://i.imgur.com/805FIIt.jpg"></a></td><td><a href="/hive-122221/@hivebuzz/pud-202302">Hive Power Up Day - February 1st 2023</a></td></tr><tr><td><a href="/hive-139531/@hivebuzz/proposal-2324"><img src="https://images.hive.blog/64x128/https://i.imgur.com/RNIZ1N6.png"></a></td><td><a href="/hive-139531/@hivebuzz/proposal-2324">The Hive Gamification Proposal</a></td></tr></table>

###### Support the HiveBuzz project. [Vote](https://hivesigner.com/sign/update_proposal_votes?proposal_ids=%5B%22248%22%5D&approve=true) for [our proposal](https://peakd.com/me/proposals/248)!
properties (22)
authorhivebuzz
permlinknotify-bushwhack-20230130t195805
categoryspsproposal
json_metadata{"image":["http://hivebuzz.me/notify.t6.png"]}
created2023-01-30 19:58:06
last_update2023-01-30 19:58:06
depth1
children0
last_payout2023-02-06 19:58:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,380
author_reputation369,394,088,623,577
root_title"Make botting battles where SPS is rewarded against terms of service."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id120,334,922
net_rshares0
@nebulusx ·
$3.73
Proposing botting is against TOS without explaining how to identify bots is a non-starter for me. I'm not going to start the foundation for a witch hunt without clear guidelines on this.
👍  , , , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authornebulusx
permlinkre-bushwhack-rpb8og
categoryspsproposal
json_metadata{"tags":["spsproposal"],"app":"peakd/2023.1.1"}
created2023-01-30 18:00:18
last_update2023-01-30 18:00:18
depth1
children18
last_payout2023-02-06 18:00:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value1.868 HBD
curator_payout_value1.866 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length186
author_reputation3,103,684,816,837
root_title"Make botting battles where SPS is rewarded against terms of service."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id120,329,479
net_rshares5,977,973,811,156
author_curate_reward""
vote details (12)
@aironeous ·
No witch hunt is needed to take a first step. We all know what services are openly displayed as a botting service. With this change something can start to be done. Simply cease and desists orders can progress from there or proposals on how to enforce this but with what lawyer fees/source of money? From the DAO? Do we vote on that? How much is that going to cost? Is the cost predictable? Do we have that $ at this point?
properties (22)
authoraironeous
permlinkre-nebulusx-rpfl7h
categoryspsproposal
json_metadata{"tags":["spsproposal"],"app":"peakd/2023.1.1"}
created2023-02-02 02:21:18
last_update2023-02-02 02:21:18
depth2
children0
last_payout2023-02-09 02:21:18
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length423
author_reputation-93,962,136,451
root_title"Make botting battles where SPS is rewarded against terms of service."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id120,411,869
net_rshares0
@bushwhack ·
I agree, IDing and proving its a bot is insanely hard. Which is why I did not include anything beyond making it against TOS. Im not a subject matter expert there and will not pretend to be. Hopefully people from the community with that kind of knowledge can flesh it out for us in the future.
properties (22)
authorbushwhack
permlinkre-nebulusx-rpb9b2
categoryspsproposal
json_metadata{"tags":["spsproposal"],"app":"peakd/2023.1.1"}
created2023-01-30 18:13:51
last_update2023-01-30 18:13:51
depth2
children16
last_payout2023-02-06 18:13:51
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length292
author_reputation352,427,589,096
root_title"Make botting battles where SPS is rewarded against terms of service."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id120,330,399
net_rshares0
@bronko · (edited)
is pretty easy with bots, aggy even said that himself, because bots access the game differently, they enter commands, card numbers etc. no human does that, we click on a card with the mouse! ;)
properties (22)
authorbronko
permlinkre-bushwhack-rpbgzu
categoryspsproposal
json_metadata{"tags":"spsproposal"}
created2023-01-30 20:59:54
last_update2023-01-30 21:03:00
depth3
children8
last_payout2023-02-06 20:59:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length193
author_reputation4,670,836,816,123
root_title"Make botting battles where SPS is rewarded against terms of service."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id120,336,707
net_rshares0
@killwizzy ·
$0.02
offering an option without a reasonable way of making it become reality is called populism.
that's why Brexit failed so miserably.
removing bots reduces the number of games played drastically.
new or bad players also have far less chance to win against veteran players.
Rental income would dimnish if the entire Bot base can no longer make a profit, and players who dont want to play manual constantly will likely start adding cards to the rental market instead of taking them off.
you will have people who own cards and bot on several alts start selling or renting those cards also.
on top of the fact that town halls mentioned botting was legal on several occasions and it wouldn't change in the future.
removing a method of getting a profit from assets = asset value drops, thats simply how a market works.
removing predictability by having populism overrule old verdicts = less chance of long term investing.
👍  , , ,
👎  
properties (23)
authorkillwizzy
permlinkre-bushwhack-sc1l78pc
categoryspsproposal
json_metadata{"format":"markdown","app":"Splex.GG"}
created2023-01-30 20:51:42
last_update2023-01-30 20:51:42
depth3
children6
last_payout2023-02-06 20:51:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.010 HBD
curator_payout_value0.009 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length912
author_reputation730,974,599
root_title"Make botting battles where SPS is rewarded against terms of service."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id120,336,393
net_rshares35,593,320,466
author_curate_reward""
vote details (5)
@oaaguy ·
$0.06
To me, this proposal goes against the main principles of web3 and account ownership, and I would vote against this. I would be more supportive if you were to revise your proposal to have separate leagues or divisions for botted and live accounts. But I appreciate your passion for the game and that you want to do things to make it better.  
👍  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
👎  , ,
properties (23)
authoroaaguy
permlinkre-bushwhack-rpb8ew
categoryspsproposal
json_metadata{"tags":["spsproposal"],"app":"peakd/2023.1.1"}
created2023-01-30 17:54:36
last_update2023-01-30 17:54:36
depth1
children0
last_payout2023-02-06 17:54:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.030 HBD
curator_payout_value0.028 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length341
author_reputation2,519,975,319,782
root_title"Make botting battles where SPS is rewarded against terms of service."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id120,329,236
net_rshares99,270,559,453
author_curate_reward""
vote details (19)
@samuel-swinton ·
NO for me (based on this proposal).

I would like to see data that show bots are a problem. In my experience, I can beat a bot any day. High-cost, high-level rare cards kill me most often. I feel that rich accounts, bot or not, are the biggest reward hogs. But that's kind of how TCG's always go.
properties (22)
authorsamuel-swinton
permlinkre-bushwhack-rpm8fp
categoryspsproposal
json_metadata{"tags":["spsproposal"],"app":"peakd/2023.1.1"}
created2023-02-05 16:28:42
last_update2023-02-05 16:28:42
depth1
children0
last_payout2023-02-12 16:28:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length296
author_reputation29,718,575,597,097
root_title"Make botting battles where SPS is rewarded against terms of service."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id120,513,376
net_rshares0
@sharkmonsters ·
I figured one of these was coming. I went ahead and voted no. Trying to stop bot farms is one thing. To make it against the rules to use a bot service to play is a whole different thing and I do not support that. Not even, like, a little bit. 
👍  , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authorsharkmonsters
permlinkre-bushwhack-bsjojrlu
categoryspsproposal
json_metadata{"format":"markdown","app":"Splex.GG"}
created2023-01-30 21:38:33
last_update2023-01-30 21:38:33
depth1
children4
last_payout2023-02-06 21:38:33
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length243
author_reputation20,004,813,848,915
root_title"Make botting battles where SPS is rewarded against terms of service."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id120,338,327
net_rshares23,017,816,320
author_curate_reward""
vote details (10)
@bcarolan639 ·
100% no from bye small stake hope the 700K pushes it to no if its even close
properties (22)
authorbcarolan639
permlinkre-sharkmonsters-rpfeu2
categoryspsproposal
json_metadata{"tags":["spsproposal"],"app":"peakd/2023.1.1"}
created2023-02-02 00:03:45
last_update2023-02-02 00:03:45
depth2
children3
last_payout2023-02-09 00:03:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length76
author_reputation-2,807,258,579,589
root_title"Make botting battles where SPS is rewarded against terms of service."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id120,407,458
net_rshares0
@bcarolan639 ·
i would lose thousands of doollars in passive income for the hours of the day you dont play my bot reliabily plays all night it would wipe half my earnings who would want this
properties (22)
authorbcarolan639
permlinkre-bcarolan639-rpfevp
categoryspsproposal
json_metadata{"tags":["spsproposal"],"app":"peakd/2023.1.1"}
created2023-02-02 00:04:42
last_update2023-02-02 00:04:42
depth3
children2
last_payout2023-02-09 00:04:42
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length175
author_reputation-2,807,258,579,589
root_title"Make botting battles where SPS is rewarded against terms of service."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id120,407,487
net_rshares0
@splex.proposals · (edited)
Proposal 8008
Thank you for participating in SPS DAO Governance @bushwhack!
You can place or monitor SPS Stake Weighted votes for and against this proposal at the link below:
[Link to this Pre-Proposal](https://splex.gg/proposals/8008)

> ***This Pre-Proposal is over!***
> 571 Users voted with 7% of the staked SPS supply at that time!

*Updated At: 2023-02-06 18:08 UTC*

![Summary](https://splex.gg/proposals/8008/png?ts1675706880)
properties (22)
authorsplex.proposals
permlinksplex-proposal-8008
categoryspsproposal
json_metadata""
created2023-01-30 17:40:57
last_update2023-02-06 18:08:00
depth1
children1
last_payout2023-02-06 17:40:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length420
author_reputation14,267,528,622
root_title"Make botting battles where SPS is rewarded against terms of service."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id120,328,804
net_rshares0
@bcarolan639 ·
Thank god looks like its gettign nuked thank god i like my one bot to play when i cant id lose 10K a year bc of that bs.
properties (22)
authorbcarolan639
permlinkre-splexproposals-rpfexs
categoryspsproposal
json_metadata{"tags":["spsproposal"],"app":"peakd/2023.1.1"}
created2023-02-02 00:05:57
last_update2023-02-02 00:05:57
depth2
children0
last_payout2023-02-09 00:05:57
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length120
author_reputation-2,807,258,579,589
root_title"Make botting battles where SPS is rewarded against terms of service."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id120,407,523
net_rshares0
@yabapmatt ·
$2.91
I was waiting and waiting for this...can't believe it took so long for the first banning bots proposal!

As far as this specific proposal goes, while it would be easy enough to make the ToS updates being proposed, there are no details at all about how this restriction should actually be enforced (or maybe it's not intended to be enforced at all?). For example, is Splinterlands responsible for identifying accounts that are using bots? If so, how should we go about doing this? What should be done if an account is found to be violating this ToS policy? What happens if someone feels that they were incorrectly identified as a bot? Is there some type of review/challenge process? There are probably even more things I couldn't come up with off the top of my head here, but the point is that there is a lot to think about and detail out when it comes to a realistic plan to ban bots and it's not just as simple as updating the ToS.

That being said, even though I don't personally support any type of ban on using bots, I do fully support the collective, super-majority decision of the SPS stakeholders via the proposal system. So if you, or anyone else, is serious about a bot-banning proposal, here's what I would propose:

Since the SPS DAO controls the SPS token, but not the Splinterlands game or things like the Splinterlands Terms of Service, I would suggest that the proposal be structured around not allowing bots to earn SPS rather than updating the ToS and/or banning them from the game. The proposal could be for SPS stakeholders to elect a committee that would be responsible for identifying which accounts are using bots to play and then no SPS tokens would be awarded to accounts on that list for winning ranked battles, in loot chests, or other areas that the committee decides. The committee would be responsible for coming up with a reliable mechanism for detecting bot use and for handling any disputes or other issues that come up from accounts identified as bots. If it is the wish of the SPS stakeholders then the Splinterlands company would work with the elected committee to provide any relevant information and data they may need for performing their duties.

There would need to be some more details about how the committee gets elected and things like that, but at a high level this would be a workable proposal to prevent accounts using bots (or at least those identified as using bots) from being able to earn SPS tokens in the game, which is fully within the control of the DAO and not up to the discretion of the Splinterlands company as something like updating the ToS would be.

I just want to clarify that I in no way would be in favor of such a proposal, and would likely vote my personal SPS stake against it. I don't ever think there should be a person or group of people responsible for deciding who can or cannot participate in a supposedly free and open system like this and it leads to a very slippery slope of censorship, personal biases, and politics, which can easily bleed over to other areas of the ecosystem.

However, like I said above, even though I am personally against it, it is not up to me (which is a good thing), and I would be happy to work with the community to effectively implement any solution they collectively approve.
👍  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authoryabapmatt
permlinkre-bushwhack-rpba7u
categoryspsproposal
json_metadata{"tags":["spsproposal"],"app":"peakd/2023.1.1"}
created2023-01-30 18:33:27
last_update2023-01-30 18:33:27
depth1
children8
last_payout2023-02-06 18:33:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value1.454 HBD
curator_payout_value1.451 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length3,282
author_reputation160,224,638,135,630
root_title"Make botting battles where SPS is rewarded against terms of service."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id120,331,854
net_rshares4,652,665,222,801
author_curate_reward""
vote details (25)
@bushwhack ·
A lot of your reply doesn't match up with what's currently being proposed. It was not without reason it did not try to create guidelines of how to enforce or even if it will be enforced at all. 

"the point is that there is a lot to think about and detail out when it comes to a realistic plan to ban bots and it's not just as simple as updating the ToS." 

I agree 100% here.

It's meant to be a deterrent to botting and a building block for experts to make their proposals/suggestions on how to enforce this in the future, if it's approved at all. I believe more people will be willing to work on IDing bots and what to do about them if botting battles for SPS is actually considered against the rules.

Thank you for your insight on how you'd go about this though, appreciate your time.



properties (22)
authorbushwhack
permlinkre-yabapmatt-rpbb4p
categoryspsproposal
json_metadata{"tags":["spsproposal"],"app":"peakd/2023.1.1"}
created2023-01-30 18:53:15
last_update2023-01-30 18:53:15
depth2
children2
last_payout2023-02-06 18:53:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length793
author_reputation352,427,589,096
root_title"Make botting battles where SPS is rewarded against terms of service."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id120,332,550
net_rshares0
@kinslayerog ·
this is a rabbit hole splinterlands doesn't want to go down. Blizzard has an asston more $ than SPL ever will and botting is prevalent . its just a sink of assets. if bots need asets to get rewards whats your beef? stop being triggered and move on with your life.
properties (22)
authorkinslayerog
permlinkre-bushwhack-v5ieoe3t
categoryspsproposal
json_metadata{"format":"markdown","app":"Splex.GG"}
created2023-01-31 04:59:24
last_update2023-01-31 04:59:24
depth3
children0
last_payout2023-02-07 04:59:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length264
author_reputation0
root_title"Make botting battles where SPS is rewarded against terms of service."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id120,350,579
net_rshares0
@yabapmatt ·
$0.18
I understand that, my reply was to help other people reading this understand that there is a lot more than this that needs to be done to actually ban bots, and to provide an idea of how it could be accomplished. I appreciate you getting the ball rolling on this though!
👍  , , ,
👎  
properties (23)
authoryabapmatt
permlinkre-bushwhack-rpbd73
categoryspsproposal
json_metadata{"tags":["spsproposal"],"app":"peakd/2023.1.1"}
created2023-01-30 19:37:48
last_update2023-01-30 19:37:48
depth3
children0
last_payout2023-02-06 19:37:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.090 HBD
curator_payout_value0.090 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length269
author_reputation160,224,638,135,630
root_title"Make botting battles where SPS is rewarded against terms of service."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id120,334,152
net_rshares293,327,875,979
author_curate_reward""
vote details (5)
@cancermancer ·
I would support a ban on (gameplay) bots in general. But having a "committee" to identify and judge who can and cannot obtain SPS seems like a terrible idea and I would in no way shape or form support that. I'd support dao funds going to the SPL team to take an anti (gameplay) bot stance and implementing tools to deal with them. These should ONLY target bots and not even remotely go close to anything involving personal bias, politics, etc. Of course, nothing is ever going to be perfect, but it should heavily discourage the use.
👍  ,
properties (23)
authorcancermancer
permlinkre-yabapmatt-fnp07tc
categoryspsproposal
json_metadata{"format":"markdown","app":"Splex.GG"}
created2023-01-30 19:28:27
last_update2023-01-30 19:28:27
depth2
children2
last_payout2023-02-06 19:28:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length533
author_reputation10,703,582
root_title"Make botting battles where SPS is rewarded against terms of service."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id120,333,692
net_rshares685,029,255
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@yabapmatt ·
$0.17
Well you're just saying that the SPL team should be the committee then, which is definitely an option, but it is still a "committee" (meaning a small group of people) that will be deciding these things and choosing who can obtain SPS through gameplay and who cannot (which is the result of "implementing tools to deal with them").

> These should ONLY target bots and not even remotely go close to anything involving personal bias, politics, etc.

If only that were actually possible. There is NO way to 100% determine if someone is using a bot or not. So whoever is in charge of determining that will have to do the best they can and then the question comes down to how to deal with disputes, which is mainly where personal biases and politics come in. That stuff is just human nature so it doesn't really matter whether it's an elected committee or the SPL team, if it's humans then human biases come into play.

So basically to me you're saying you don't support a committee to judge who can and cannot obtain SPS through battles, but then you say you'll support basically the same exact thing as long as it's the SPL team that is the committee, if I'm reading this correctly.
👍  
👎  
properties (23)
authoryabapmatt
permlinkre-cancermancer-rpbdt3
categoryspsproposal
json_metadata{"tags":["spsproposal"],"app":"peakd/2023.1.1"}
created2023-01-30 19:51:00
last_update2023-01-30 19:51:00
depth3
children1
last_payout2023-02-06 19:51:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.086 HBD
curator_payout_value0.087 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,179
author_reputation160,224,638,135,630
root_title"Make botting battles where SPS is rewarded against terms of service."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id120,334,701
net_rshares280,809,665,340
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@elistios10 ·
Again this is a catch 22, how do you decide who will be part of that comity and how can you enforce to make sure anyone in charge to decide what is bot and what's not don't get bribe or use and protect their own bot, collusion or Ban hammer abuse by those with this power etc. 

I'm not a big fan of bot but I agree with Matt original vision that is to try and build the game itself in a way to keep it decentralized and where both bots and human player can be part of the same ecosystem and trying to find a balanced way without having to police the game all the time which cost money and time and that will pissed off over what looks like 80% of the players out there that looks like they have both main account and dozens of bots to generate more value for themself.

I still think we should try to focus on finding ways to reduce exploiting overall and find ways that whether you are a human or bot account, the fact that you play our game = you generate and bring to the game as much value as you can take out to avoid having only leeches bots.

Right now, Player Staking SPS to earn reward and soulbound cards are already a good step in that right direction without the need for this bots crusade IMO. 

And really, the entire "ban bots" rhetoric is always about bots = bad but without any constructive solution to solve the real problem suggested to back that. 

Personally I will vote against that proposal until someone can come up with a fully detailed way how to get rid of bot that make sense and that is not hurting the economy itself like cards rental or affecting the time it takes between battles if you get rid of the 3/4 of the current account that are not players.

I'll gladly vote in favor when someone can come with a detailed solution plan that hold the road but until then, that's a no for me.
properties (22)
authorelistios10
permlinkre-yabapmatt-rpgp4e
categoryspsproposal
json_metadata{"tags":["spsproposal"],"app":"peakd/2023.1.1"}
created2023-02-02 16:43:27
last_update2023-02-02 16:43:27
depth2
children0
last_payout2023-02-09 16:43:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,817
author_reputation28,757,462,383
root_title"Make botting battles where SPS is rewarded against terms of service."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id120,429,268
net_rshares0
@maldin ·
I don't think the idea is to enforce anything related to bots. I think the idea is just to make it forbidden, so that those people who currently run bots would stop unless they don't mind going against terms of service. So basically the idea is to reduce botting by trusting that at least a portion of current bot runners would stop simply because they know it is not allowed.
properties (22)
authormaldin
permlinkre-yabapmatt-rpd0lo
categoryspsproposal
json_metadata{"tags":["spsproposal"],"app":"peakd/2023.1.1"}
created2023-01-31 17:01:00
last_update2023-01-31 17:01:00
depth2
children0
last_payout2023-02-07 17:01:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length376
author_reputation199,829,816,349
root_title"Make botting battles where SPS is rewarded against terms of service."
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id120,365,071
net_rshares0