Hello sir. I know you are good at heart and will definitely support my work. A little support from you will encourage us to do more here. Thanks

All this can be solved with some criteria, there must be ways that the system promotes the meritocracy without being too strict or closed with different forms of expression. Some should have gains even if they only make images of memes as long as the content is original and is well received or enjoyed by the community.

@askanything will upvote questions, one question per week, per person. If students are paid to ask questions, it will fasten mass adoption of Steemit.

Very good discussion point.

I think that the articles should be able to show two types of content: comprehensive and detail one. For those who are on-the-go, the comprehensive one is better.

Great post @chbartist. Can you explain what happened when you posted short content and were 'criticized heavily for it'? Did the criticism come in the comments or via flagging of the post? Really interested to hear as I'm a visual artist used to the Instragram model of small amounts of content regularly.

Creo que este tema es relativo:  Hay personas que comenzaron escribiendo muy mal y se les ha observado el avance al revisar su blog.  Otros lo hicieron de una vez con el manejo correcto de la escritura.  Si el contenido es de calidad, pienso que los dos están en el derecho de ser bien valorados.  
Hay contenido corto que necesita una preparación previa que toma tiempo y dedicación, por ejemplo: un aforismo, un haiku, también son valiosos.  Ahora una línea sin sentido no debería ser asumida como algo importante. 
Saludos.

This is really a good article with an interesting point of view.
Regarding to the structure of payouts in steemit it looks like that short content is preferred.
What makes me think like that?
1. most of the accounts are small ones with very small SP what leads to a vote strength in SBD from 0,000 to 0,050
2. I would suggest that this is not a fair payout for large and complex content what takes hours to produce

The only way out for steemians who provide large high-quality content might be a direct donation via the donators wallet with the quantity the donator means to be fair for the authors work.

For sure there might be another option, but I believe this will not be realistic but should work fine too:  only the wales will vote on large high-quality content, because they have enough power to vote with amounts over 1,000 SBD up to hundreds of SBD what should be fair for some of this category of content.
Maybe another tool on top of Steemit for this large and high-quality content will solve this issue in a form like you mentioned in your article (Dtube, Dsound).
Anyway, I believe there has to be some changes in the future to get a bit more fairness into the Steemit-universe.

![Zwischenlinie-2 für Steem-Post 940x120.png](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmW5fJjkyJzD5bD9kcgBYpvBVUhB4cK8vdb3iu2UWV9Lve/Zwischenlinie-2%20f%C3%BCr%20Steem-Post%20940x120.png)
with sunny greetings from Andalusia
Don Thomas

Your a talentless hack, . You have to use bots. Doesn't matter if it's short or long. No one cares about what you have to say period.

https://steemitimages.com/0x0/https://s5.postimg.org/swlq3s453/esteem_animation_promo_v1.gif

To the question in your title, my Magic 8-Ball says:<blockquote>My sources say no</blockquote><hr>*Hi! I'm a bot, and this answer was posted automatically. Check [this post out](https://steemit.com/introduceyourself/@magic8ball/introducing-the-magic-8-ball-bot) for more information.*

I noticed that too.. posting short content is more like posting out of compliance to just merely post something. And admittedly, i have been doing that from day 1. Nobody informed us the minnows and you were right there were no stated rules about it. So now that explains the small payouts or no payouts at all. 

Maybe if the information was properly disseminated we would have posted lengthy ones. I'll do try to post ONE now and check how it goes. To be honest, minnows are blind to this things. Im glad i stumbled into your article. Good for me, it got me interested to read. Thank you good sir.

Hope next time you share few secrets to standout or to become successful here in steemit without even paying bots to the services for you..

Musics is also my hobby, but i really enjoy the pop music then rock one.

Without short form content we ommit stuff like IG, twitter and more. It's important to have a diversity IMO

Your opinion must be quite popular or else you wouldn't be all over the trending page.

You have recieved a free upvote from minnowpond, Send 0.1 -> 2 SBD with your post url as the memo to recieve an upvote from up to 100 accounts!

Well, at least short posts get read. What is the value of a 1000 word post if nobody bothers to read it until the end? Or is that what gives it extra value? That those who actually read it possesses information very few possesses?

It seems that the general opinion around here seems to be that "Quality" equals "Quantity", which isn't true. I have seen a couple long post without any substance, short posts with a lot of value and long posts that were actually short but looked long because of a remarkable long trail of credits and self-advertisement.

You got a 15.91% upvote from @postpromoter courtesy of @chbartist!

Want to promote your posts too? Check out the [Steem Bot Tracker website](https://steembottracker.com) for more info. If you would like to support the development of @postpromoter and the bot tracker please [vote for @yabapmatt for witness!](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=yabapmatt&approve=1)

I would love content on steem to take a form like Medium

Most of the users will not read a very long posts unless they are of interest to them but will look at pictures and videos all day long.

Interesting point of view, thanks for sharing