Let it burn! Rather get it out of the system than having surprises later :-D

Definitly voting yes for this !

Burn baby burn!

Yes vote for me. But I would love to hear any counter arguments as to why we shouldn't do this.

![untitled.gif](https://media.tenor.com/8getfSBQTxEAAAAC/owen-wilson-loki.gif)

Who is going to perform this action?
I've got impression, that the team is overwhelmed with gazillions of "quick", "small", "easy to implement" proposals instead of delivering real content. Every "obvious" proposals postpone real content.

Personally I don't see the point, this isn't going to do anything except take away options in the future.
It's not going to change the short term supply or demand for these cards since they aren't on the market, delegated or otherwise available to any player. So no near term improvement in CL market dynamics. It's just a "*It feels good to do something*" proposal...

Personally I think anything that gives the DAO options is a valuable tool in the toolkit. And since burning means that we can't ever make them available in the future, if the situation ever changes... then burning these means the DAO will never have that tool. I generally prefer "giving to DAO" over most burning mechanics.

Voting yes for this. I would have liked them to be used for the company bots but since they will be able to use ghost cards, I'm good with burning these.

Supported!

<center>PIZZA!


$PIZZA slices delivered:
@sirsmokesalot96<sub>(2/5)</sub> tipped @clayboyn 


</center>

I'm a bit taken back by seeing proposals for bot service with "ghost" cards and this burning proposal.

Burning Splinterlands NFT cards and DEC (Dark Energy Crystals) should be carefully considered due to several reasons:

1. **Economic Value**: NFT cards and DEC have economic value within the Splinterlands ecosystem. Burning them effectively destroys this value, which might not be beneficial unless done for strategic reasons such as reducing supply to increase scarcity.

2. **Community Perception**: Burning NFTs can sometimes be seen as controversial within communities that value digital ownership and sustainability. It could lead to backlash or negative sentiment among players and collectors.

3. **Long-term Strategy**: Burning cards or DEC should align with a long-term strategy that enhances the overall gameplay experience or economy of Splinterlands. Without clear strategic goals, burning could be seen as wasteful.

4. **Alternative Uses**: There might be alternative uses for NFT cards and DEC in the future, such as in-game events, promotions, or future features that could add value. Burning them eliminates these possibilities.

5. **Environmental Impact**: While digital, NFTs still consume energy during creation and transactions. Burning them en masse without purpose could be seen as environmentally irresponsible if not justified by significant benefits.

I am not the sharpest pencil in the box so there are probably other reasons than the ones stated above. Just thought I would add my two cents to the conversation.

Might as well. Will it help anything? Probably not. Will it hurt anything? Definitely not. I didn't have to think about it much. 

I strongly agree with this proposal. NFTY was an interesting idea but was not executed properly. Every time I tried using the service I was unsuccesful.

!PIZZA

Thank you for participating in SPS DAO Governance @clayboyn!
You can place or monitor SPS Stake Weighted votes for and against this proposal at the link below:
[Link to this Pre-Proposal](https://splex.gg/proposals/19554)


*Updated At: 2024-06-16 15:23 UTC*

![Summary](https://splex.gg/proposals/19554/png?ts1718551380)

Does this need a vote? I thought it was already approved with the initial agreement?

That said, this is a clear NO for me. There must be better options.

I would rather the DAO get them, not sure of the agreement that would be needed to make that fair.

I think wholesaling them off with a soulbound period to up and coming new players services might be fun.

I have not put much though into it, but burning just doesnt make sense to me.