Why was this information missing from the  proposal to hire a DAO  Project Manager? I recall agreeing to your salary but I do not recall any bonuses being mentioned? 

"**For posterity, I'm pretty neutral on this topic in general**" These are your words, from the failing flowdesk proposal. This implies  you can adopt a neutral position in these proposals and it doesn't matter to you. Therefore all proposals are solely for the benefit or detriment of the DAO and not the DAO project manager.  

I believe we need more clarity here.  this has no limits for the DAO manager to write blank checks.

the DAO manager could laterally bring proposals fourth every hour, and just burn up the DAO dec funds on half baked ideas.

Also the idea of the 100k DEC burn was to make sure users had to use their own DEC to bring fourth a proposal.   in this scenario.  the DAO manager could bring everyone's proposals forward at no cost to the individuals.    effectively negating the need for community members to have to put forward their own 100k DEC

I believe this needs a  up to 4 proposals a month close for free...  or something.  i see this as ripe for abuse.

Yes, absolutely.

basically a good idea. but i think there should be rules for it. like maximum number. whether it has to go through a certain process to be considered a dao proposal in the end, and not some private proposals, or whether any specific criteria have to be met. can it only be dao things or also ingame things? etc etc
I think that would also help you in the end and protect you from some insinuations in the future.

#nobeautifulthingswithbots

You guys are dumb if you don't put some set of limitations on this.  not only should there be a limit on quantity to make sure we are focusing on quality ideas, but we also need to set parameters for what types of proposals qualify for payment by the DAO.  right now we will be giving a blank check to one person to put forth any idea they might dream up.  we are literally giving this guy the authority to drive Most regulatory and governmental policy for the game.  sure we can fire the person but all he needs is a small group of whales working as silent partners to redirect all value back to themselves.  I'm not saying this will happen, but you don't need car insurance until you actually need it, but then it's too late. vote NO until this gets updated. Please.

I of course support this, thank you for doing this proposal Clay.

Also I want everyone to know that you paid our of your own pocket the cost of this proposal and the last one.  Both are purely proposals to make the DAO better, and neither were something you wouldn't done on your own.  So thank you for caring about the DAO and stepping up when things are needed even before you were on the payroll!

First off, i think with 5k$ a month you can buy enough decs for proposals, and second this has no limits, you can abuse and make 10 proposals a day Just to rise dec price when you want to sell yours, the dao Is a treasure chest till empty?

Rather make a proposal, dao has free proposals, thats fair

As long as the community is not suggesting unnecessary proposals for the sake of just burning DEC, I think this proposal makes sense so that the SPS DAO project manager can effectively make the necessary proposals for our SPS DAO governance. 

No brainer!!  Necessary for the functionality of the job!  

nobrainer

I 100% agree that you shouldn't have to pay for the community proposals out of pocket. 

But Making the DAO burn DEC for them makes zero sense. Why drain the DAO of assets just because the community wants to hold a vote? The whole point of a proposal requiring a DEC burn is to discourage proposal spam. These proposals, being community proposals, are by their very nature the opposite of spam. 

They should be free, with perhaps a limited number per month.

There are no limits to this.
No rules.
Its literally 4 sentences, for an open cheque book.

There are no limits to this. 
No rules 
Its literally 4 sentences, for an open cheque book.

yeah
As long as the DAO doesn't adopt every proposal from every player out there. this should be only used for top-priority proposal

Obviously makes sense, I wonder if there is anyway to speed up the process on things that are almost unanimous. Like a super majority number we could hit early on to get things moving faster

Well that's a no brainer if I've ever seen one!

This is great idea as long as he spends time checking proposal for improvements for the whole community is more and acceptance by whales to improve SPS success 

Well I don't expect Clay to pay $90 everytime a DAO governance proposal is warranted from community soft concensus and neither should anyone else. No brainer for me.

You should state in the proposal that making proposals costs 100k DEC and that is what is being subsidized. 

Reading the proposal as someone who just plays the game it sounded like you just wanted to pay yourself 100k for starting a vote. Most people cant keep track of all the crypto bullshit so just spell it out in plain english next time

Yeah, there's no way you should be paying for proposals out of your own pocket. I will vote for this and I would vote for it if it was worded differently so that you could make them for free, essentially. 

Proposals made by the DAO manager should not cost the ecosystem anything.  If we don't like what he is doing, then we can replace him.  

Could it not be proposed to make an exception to the 100k dec cost for proposals coming from this entity in regards to official Dao buisness related ones? While this helps with dec control through burning it also continues to remove assets the Dao holds that give it value which In the end is what investors are drawn to. Just a question.