create account

why closing upvotes is a really shitty idea by danieleder

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com
· @danieleder · (edited)
$1.55
why closing upvotes is a really shitty idea
<p>the biggest benefits people have from good articles or postsΒ </p>
<p>are the ones that will specifically google or search these articles.</p>
<p>now when the voting is closed and no further payouts can happen</p>
<p>basically steemit takes all the benefits of the original poster and he has no additional benefits.</p>
<p>so unless you write crap &amp; push it so it gets upvoted quickly there is no reason for people</p>
<p>who write articles that are really of high value to other people to write them here.</p>
<p>when i write something on my blog i can benefit from those hits forever into the future. not so on steemit.</p>
<p><br /></p>
<p>one thing which would be highly valuable also is if you could see where the visitors on your posts are coming from .. like a stats page. cause if i see one article doing well i might add a link to promote a book related to that article for example etc.</p>

https://cdnil1.fiverrcdn.com/photos/445065/medium/upvote.jpg
πŸ‘  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authordanieleder
permlinkwhy-closing-upvotes-is-a-really-shitty-idea
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem","steemit","bad","ideas","upvotes"],"image":["https://cdnil1.fiverrcdn.com/photos/445065/medium/upvote.jpg"]}
created2016-07-27 11:48:12
last_update2016-07-27 11:51:30
depth0
children16
last_payout2016-08-27 00:18:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value1.186 HBD
curator_payout_value0.361 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length967
author_reputation1,711,469,532,907
root_title"why closing upvotes is a really shitty idea"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id401,249
net_rshares646,032,121,136
author_curate_reward""
vote details (53)
@allmt ·
One work around would be to re-post old stuff, see if it gets traction differently.
properties (22)
authorallmt
permlinkre-danieleder-why-closing-upvotes-is-a-really-shitty-idea-20160727t120711415z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-07-27 12:07:12
last_update2016-07-27 12:07:12
depth1
children1
last_payout2016-08-27 00:18:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length83
author_reputation536,903,509,703
root_title"why closing upvotes is a really shitty idea"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id401,628
net_rshares0
@danieleder · (edited)
no. thats not what i meant.. thats the same game again. 
the way it works right now is like publishers telling authors your books earnings just hold value for 2 days.. after that anything thats sold goes to us... doesn't make any sense. 
i think its a problem and needs to be fixed if there is to be longterm value in steemit posts. i am actually already thinking of a way to fix this issue on my own website http://www.duno.com
properties (22)
authordanieleder
permlinkre-allmt-re-danieleder-why-closing-upvotes-is-a-really-shitty-idea-20160727t121745824z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"links":["http://www.duno.com"]}
created2016-07-27 12:17:45
last_update2016-07-27 12:54:09
depth2
children0
last_payout2016-08-27 00:18:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length428
author_reputation1,711,469,532,907
root_title"why closing upvotes is a really shitty idea"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id401,854
net_rshares0
@dcsignals ·
I kind of agree to an extent, but at the same time this isn't really a blogging platform, its more like a Reddit style social content sharing site - which always emphasises a fast turn around of trending content rather than permanent useful posts anyway.
properties (22)
authordcsignals
permlinkre-danieleder-why-closing-upvotes-is-a-really-shitty-idea-20160727t115257418z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-07-27 11:52:18
last_update2016-07-27 11:52:18
depth1
children1
last_payout2016-08-27 00:18:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length254
author_reputation52,545,763,130
root_title"why closing upvotes is a really shitty idea"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id401,336
net_rshares0
@danieleder ·
i have never ever gained something from reddit unless if i happened to find it through google. maybe two or three times in my life.  i saw this more like a blogging platform but i think you are right. so far i have not gained anything from steemit except a few hundred bucks because dan upvoted it. i haven't seen one post which made my life better.
properties (22)
authordanieleder
permlinkre-dcsignals-re-danieleder-why-closing-upvotes-is-a-really-shitty-idea-20160727t115534520z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-07-27 11:55:36
last_update2016-07-27 11:55:36
depth2
children0
last_payout2016-08-27 00:18:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length349
author_reputation1,711,469,532,907
root_title"why closing upvotes is a really shitty idea"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id401,407
net_rshares0
@loewan ·
Isn't this technical impossibility? How can the Steem blockchain can keep track of transactions for all posts indefinitely? There has to be a cap off point somewhere.
properties (22)
authorloewan
permlinkre-danieleder-why-closing-upvotes-is-a-really-shitty-idea-20160727t115154249z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-07-27 11:51:54
last_update2016-07-27 11:51:54
depth1
children1
last_payout2016-08-27 00:18:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length166
author_reputation159,161,977,675
root_title"why closing upvotes is a really shitty idea"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id401,328
net_rshares0
@danieleder ·
you might be right... but one could limit upvotes to the ones who actually give money instead of allowing so many spam bots upvote at 0.00 then the blockchain wouldnt become so bloated maybe. but i dont know anything about blockchain technology. maybe its impossible
properties (22)
authordanieleder
permlinkre-loewan-re-danieleder-why-closing-upvotes-is-a-really-shitty-idea-20160727t115338276z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-07-27 11:53:39
last_update2016-07-27 11:53:39
depth2
children0
last_payout2016-08-27 00:18:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length266
author_reputation1,711,469,532,907
root_title"why closing upvotes is a really shitty idea"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id401,365
net_rshares0
@rainchen ·
People getting tired , seriously im getting tired i dont have any inspirations to write anything maybe i should sell all my steem now .
properties (22)
authorrainchen
permlinkre-danieleder-why-closing-upvotes-is-a-really-shitty-idea-20160727t121707292z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-07-27 12:17:09
last_update2016-07-27 12:17:09
depth1
children4
last_payout2016-08-27 00:18:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length135
author_reputation10,954,913,557,999
root_title"why closing upvotes is a really shitty idea"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id401,836
net_rshares0
@danieleder ·
i am not getting tired really by steem. i think its good in general. but i think some big issues for it to last long need to be fixed. i think the unlimited upvoting is one of them. one possibility would be that when people upvote later it goes from their own personal account rather than through inflation
properties (22)
authordanieleder
permlinkre-rainchen-re-danieleder-why-closing-upvotes-is-a-really-shitty-idea-20160727t122806999z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-07-27 12:28:06
last_update2016-07-27 12:28:06
depth2
children3
last_payout2016-08-27 00:18:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length306
author_reputation1,711,469,532,907
root_title"why closing upvotes is a really shitty idea"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id402,120
net_rshares0
@rainchen ·
If you catch a whale , people always talks about how to catch a whale but can you really catching one of them ? 
Upvoting always an issue here we feel unfaur , we feel like we giving our best , we write good contents but why no whales upvoting it ? Look at your post are ypu happy with that upvote ? To me i will consider its a so-so situation , you win you lose , you win from voting but losing in earning , why we in steemit ? Ofcourse to making money right . im not greedy type of person if 10 dolphin upvoting my post per day i will be so grateful. Dont you ?
properties (22)
authorrainchen
permlinkre-danieleder-re-rainchen-re-danieleder-why-closing-upvotes-is-a-really-shitty-idea-20160727t123918747z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-07-27 12:39:24
last_update2016-07-27 12:39:24
depth3
children2
last_payout2016-08-27 00:18:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length563
author_reputation10,954,913,557,999
root_title"why closing upvotes is a really shitty idea"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id402,452
net_rshares0
@twinner ·
post it twice, here and at your blog.
πŸ‘  ,
properties (23)
authortwinner
permlinkre-danieleder-why-closing-upvotes-is-a-really-shitty-idea-20160727t130101819z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-07-27 13:01:00
last_update2016-07-27 13:01:00
depth1
children1
last_payout2016-08-27 00:18:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length37
author_reputation67,104,788,413,629
root_title"why closing upvotes is a really shitty idea"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id403,040
net_rshares3,253,424,936
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@danieleder · (edited)
you are right.. but i still think its a bit unfair.. you can link to your blog from here though... ;-) double content is not so liked by google.. so we will see if that strategy would work
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authordanieleder
permlinkre-twinner-re-danieleder-why-closing-upvotes-is-a-really-shitty-idea-20160727t144832564z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-07-27 14:48:33
last_update2016-07-27 14:48:57
depth2
children0
last_payout2016-08-27 00:18:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length188
author_reputation1,711,469,532,907
root_title"why closing upvotes is a really shitty idea"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id405,993
net_rshares1,663,125,016
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@uwe69 ·
Since many items at first disappear in the crowd and be found until later, many authors might lose interest in the post.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authoruwe69
permlinkre-danieleder-why-closing-upvotes-is-a-really-shitty-idea-20160727t115353487z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-07-27 11:53:51
last_update2016-07-27 11:53:51
depth1
children2
last_payout2016-08-27 00:18:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length120
author_reputation35,524,530,484,330
root_title"why closing upvotes is a really shitty idea"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id401,369
net_rshares28,252,655
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@danieleder ·
not sure what you mean but i think the biggest value comes when people seek it later. If i see steemit overrun by crap without creating value i don't see how bloggers. especially not the bloggers with traction &amp; fans already will stay here.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authordanieleder
permlinkre-uwe69-re-danieleder-why-closing-upvotes-is-a-really-shitty-idea-20160727t115814057z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-07-27 11:58:15
last_update2016-07-27 11:58:15
depth2
children1
last_payout2016-08-27 00:18:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length244
author_reputation1,711,469,532,907
root_title"why closing upvotes is a really shitty idea"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id401,450
net_rshares96,417,902
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@uwe69 ·
This is what i mean.
πŸ‘  
properties (23)
authoruwe69
permlinkre-danieleder-re-uwe69-re-danieleder-why-closing-upvotes-is-a-really-shitty-idea-20160727t120031621z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-07-27 12:00:30
last_update2016-07-27 12:00:30
depth3
children0
last_payout2016-08-27 00:18:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length20
author_reputation35,524,530,484,330
root_title"why closing upvotes is a really shitty idea"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id401,487
net_rshares28,252,655
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)