Why does your mic stand say "Heil"?

Probably enough to get Paul Manafort a pardon.  lol.  

Your way behind the ballgame, not enough hours left to the night to want to go over that again.

I mean, it's still a reasonably decent post...

First let's get you up to speed then whatever you don't find answered you can come back and ask.  
(prior comment on the subject)
Well as usual I see you haven't done your homework. Giuliani never hired Lev Parnas, that would be diGenova and Toensing, a law firm hired by Firtash. diGenova and Toensing said they hired Parnas to transcribe documents that were written in Ukrainian. When it comes to Firtash, and if we get that far, Joe Biden is going to regret the day he set Firtash up. Which the more I keep learning and what happens coming forth will determine whether this is really a power struggle between democrats and republicans over control of the the corruption money flowing out of Ukraine or a real call for justice in getting to the truth that it was Ukraine and the democrats who set up the interference in the 2016 election. If you try and sort it all out it makes complete sense that the democrats were heavily invested in a Hillary win as it took them years to plan or push out Russia's (or tried to, which was one reason Russia moved into Ukraine) main control over gas supplies in Europe and other countries and to explore along the coast line to frack for natural gas and oil. It wasn't just about Russia and Ukraine but about the players involved in the distribution and ownership of the companies. You can call it ironically or another coincident but the same time they went after Burisma's then owner under the pretense of obtaining illegally licenses for drilling (their first initiative and move against him, maybe this is why he opted to sell all but a minority share back in 2011, I do not know) but they also used that same tactic to start an investigation against Firtash. Ultimately it would be Firtash not Parnas whom set Giuliani up with the right players. Knowing how Trump plays it's (in my opinion) completely feasible (also given Giuliani's long relationship with Parnas) that they used Parnas as a distraction while they worked with Firtash to get connected to the right players. If that is even remotely true the joke will be on the democrats for falling for it. In Ukrainian Firtash made billions as a distributor between Russia and Ukraine contracting through Naftogaz. In order to take control of Ukraine gas supplies he and Russia would have to be contended with. Firtash also worked in the procurement of minerals on the international markets. Back in 2011 an investigation was started against Firtash concerning titanium mining rights in India. Boeing was supposedly desperate for titanium as they had gotten a huge order. They turned to a company in Chicago who does international contracting for rare minerals. That company turned them onto Firtash but in the contract the company told Boeing, and it was written right in the contract that when dealing with oversea's parties in securing rare minerals there was a chance that bribes could be involved. Knowing this Boeing signed the contract and Firtash then went about paying India for the mining rights. Boeing backs out of the contract and the deal didn't go through. Firtash then finds himself being investigated for bribing officials in India. In early 2013 a grand jury finds him guilty and hands down an indictment. No charges are brought against Boeing or the company who was working with Boeing and no charges were ever filed in India and Indian officials said there was never any bribery. The picture wasn't complete yet as they hadn't finished helping Ukraine overthrow the presidency of Yanukovych, that task didn't come to fruition until February 2014. Now here comes with a lot of things coincidentally collide, the UK files charges against the owner of Burisma for money laundering, (though he'd already sold the majority of the company and fled to Russia along with Yanukovych), Firtash is picked up and arrested on the indictment charge, he post bond and flees the country, this is all done and taken care of by the end of March 2014, along with a hefty deposit into Hunter Bidens company posted on Mar 31, 2014, Hunters partner is appointed to the board of Burisma and in April 2014 Hunter Biden follows onto the board of Burisma.

Okay so hold onto your hat as this part can make people's head spin. A man name Ihor Kolomisky bought Zlochevsky shares of Burisma apparently oblivious to the new players in town. So in essence when British authorities froze Zlochevsky assets in Britain there was nothing there for Ukraine to hand over to Britain as he no longer owned the company. In essence it was really Ihor Kolomisky that Britain really wanted but paperwork on who owned the company was pretty hard to find....though investigative reporters did finally find it...but at this point Biden and his players were well into the game of setting up new players up to and including investment and banking companies within the US which ended up becoming four entities as co-owners of the company. After all the work they'd gone through to over thrown a government whereas in a Forbes article titled Play The Energy Card in Crimea, dated March 2014: "early hints are the west is willing to let Crimea go. Former defense secretary Bob Gates said last week he was already convinced the region was lost while this week Secretary of State John Kerry commented that Putin's actions in the Crimea were "not a threat" and "nothing personal". The article also state: "The rut of all this is that we are likely to go into a long tedious cycle where Putin consolidates political and administrative control over the peninsula while the west equivocates." In essence the players within the Obama administration were willing to sell out Crimea over control of the gas supplies. Several months go by and Britain is ordered to release the assets of Zlochevsky because they haven't gotten any documentation or cooperation from Ukraine. That's because in reality there is none because they have the wrong owner. So technically when you read that the prosecutors office in Ukraine wrote a letter stating there is no investigation currently going on concerning Zlochevsky it was true because for one he no longer owned the company and for two he'd left the country. Now if Britain had asked about Ihor Kolomoisky as being suspect there may have been something they could have looked into. What about all those demands made by many including the UK to get to the bottom of corruption in Ukraine?......well, hold onto that hat.....seems those four companies that formed into Burisma became a group of foreign investors, banks, etc., and settled on becoming one entity known as Privat Bank which somehow along the line ended us coming up short 5.5 billion dollars in their account. That didn't bold over well when Ukrainian investigators couldn't find the money....(which is still missing to this day) so Joe Biden goes over there and demands the prosecutor get fired (as we seen on the video) ...but he plays it like the world has come to know it all along, that he's talking about the investigation into Zlochevsky, the once owner of Burisma because heaven forbid it ever comes out that they masterminded the control over Ukraine's natural resources by Britain mistakenly asking that the previous owner be investigated for money laundering when it fact it was Ihor Kolomisky whom they aligned themselves in business with that Britain really wanted investigated for money laundering and if that had happened maybe, just maybe they wouldn't be missing 5.5 billion dollars. Does the prospects for ever having an investigation against Ihor Kolominsky seem likely under this new president? Nah, the new president and himself are good friends, he actually bankrolled his run for the presidency. So given all this you can see why the democrats with all they have invested in this during the Obama years that it was crucial for them to see Hillary win, crucial enough, in my opinion, and probably many others if they understood it all, to have actually set up the Russia collusion narrative. It would also explain their push to oust Trump through impeachment, they have a lot of stuff buried under the rug they don't want exposed. Even though the chances that Trump will get the current president to investigate any corruption are slim given the close alliance the president has with Ihor the status quo in Washington feels that even a Pence presidency better understands the dirty politics of Washington and overall it looks like one hell of a dirty game....so like I said, will Trump press for the truth or is this an inner struggle over control of foreign resources.

....more getting up to speed:

July 20-22, 2009 Biden takes first visit to Ukraine early in Obama's presidency to tell Ukraine the new administration will be open to Ukraine and they have nothing to fear by the Obama administrations attempts to reset relations with Russia. President Yanukovych was already pro Russian and between the reset of relations under Obama and the Yanukovych pro Russian stance is probably what led to Russia taking Crimea.
Early in 2014 Britain demands and investigation into Burisma for money laundering and freezes the assets of Burisma's owner in Britain.
In Feb 2014 Ukraine protest topple presidency of Viktor Yanukovych, Biden goes there to deliver promises of economic, energy and governance assistance. In April 2014 Dennis Archer joined the board of Burisma followed shortly thereafter by Hunter Biden. As of 2/28/14 a firm owned by Archer and Hunter, Rosemont Seneca had an account balance of $4.00, over the course of 2014-15 that account grew to over 3 million dollars as seen in a court filing against Dennis Archer for money laundering scribd/document/404001731/Rosemont-Seneca-Partners-Court-File. To see the court filing put .com after scribd in the above address. (which is a current ongoing investigation) In June 2014 Joe Biden goes to Ukraine again with promises of 48 million is US aid at the new Presidents Poroshenko's inauguration. This is also the first suspected time that Joe Biden had the investigation requested by Britain against Burisma be shut down as the investigation gets shelved through 2014 through early 2015. Prosecutor Shokin was not the prosecutor during this time, he was the deputy prosecutor, he had no say in shutting down the investigation the first time. In Dec of 2014 Britain again demanded cooperation into their own investigation of money laundering by Burisma, in response the US sent letters asking Ukraine to cooperate yet nothing comes of it. In Jan 2015 a court orders Britain to unfreeze the assets of Burisma's owner as they can't prove the allegations they brought forth against the owner. The old prosecutor retired and Shokin became the chief prosecutor in Feb 2015.. When Britain when to the UN and fired off a fiery speech about the lack of cooperation in their investigation in Sept 2015 it was ordered that the investigation be re-opened, which Shokin did re-open the case, the same case he worked on under the former chief prosecutor who ordered it shut down. When rumors started to surface that Archer and Hunter would be questioned in the investigation Joe Biden showed up in Dec 2015 and ordered the prosecutor fired or he was going to withhold one billion dollars in loan guarantees. That was the second time Biden had the investigation shut down as the case was immediately transferred to the NABU, National Anti Corruption Bureau of Ukraine which was closely aligned to the US embassy in Kiev which ordered it shut down. It was one of three cases that were ordered shut down after the firing of Shokin, another case involved George Soros. Now forward to current times and the president of Ukraine Biden claims he spent more time talking to then his own first loses his re-election bid, that was April of this year. Four days after that election loss is when Biden decided to officially announce his bid to run for president after months of speculation. Coincidence? I think not. It is also the same month that the democrats changed the whistle blower law to include those who didn't have first hand knowledge. Coincidence again? I think not. I think you will find this is the third time Biden interfered to keep a lid on the investigations as they knew the old president was no longer there to protect them and that as soon as the new president came into office in July Trump would request they re-open the investigations, which is exactly what happened. The president who lost his re-election bid would have also had every reason in the world to help coordinate an election interference in the 2016 election as Ukraine was mad as hell that the president they ousted in the rebellion had just run off with billions of dollars that belonged to Ukraine...that president was helped getting elected by Manafort who worked for him as a political consultant, Manafort went to work for Trump so you can see why Ukraine had good reason why they wouldn't want to see Trump elected. So yeah there is a lot of questions of corruptions, one currently being dealt with in a court of law here in the US against Dennis Archer and Rosemont Seneca and there's only one person who always seems to be at the helm of hindering the investigations at it isn't Trump. You can't claim innocents or bogus conspiracies if nothing was ever allowed to be investigated. That's just plain common sense.