https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ciGE67y53U ### When Should Dems Polling Under 2% Get Out? When should 2020 Democratic candidates polling under 2% get out of the race? ### When do you think they should get out?
author | davidpakman |
---|---|
permlink | when-should-dems-polling-under-2-get-out |
category | world |
json_metadata | {"tags":["world","news","politics","blog","life"],"image":["https://img.youtube.com/vi/6ciGE67y53U/0.jpg"],"links":["https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ciGE67y53U"],"app":"steemit/0.1","format":"markdown"} |
created | 2019-07-12 14:25:03 |
last_update | 2019-07-12 14:25:03 |
depth | 0 |
children | 1 |
last_payout | 2019-07-19 14:25:03 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.219 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.041 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 214 |
author_reputation | 682,749,338,699,639 |
root_title | "When Should Dems Polling Under 2% Get Out?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 88,205,426 |
net_rshares | 831,944,204,248 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
coinbitgold | 0 | 49,426,247,650 | 100% | ||
fyrstikken | 0 | 26,368,553 | 1% | ||
gikitiki | 0 | 21,810,948,684 | 50% | ||
gomatthew | 0 | 3,198,927,802 | 10% | ||
bloom | 0 | 214,053,488,168 | 50% | ||
traindriver | 0 | 550,232,507 | 100% | ||
winburn | 0 | 488,903,004 | 90% | ||
mooncryption | 0 | 934,519,033 | 60% | ||
curtiscolwell | 0 | 2,231,496,888 | 100% | ||
davidpakman | 0 | 312,032,237,152 | 100% | ||
wander-lust | 0 | 4,179,873,866 | 100% | ||
engineeringsteem | 0 | 2,931,293,038 | 10% | ||
bitinvdig0 | 0 | 1,592,512,967 | 100% | ||
bob.rinella | 0 | 549,171,812 | 100% | ||
beautifulliving | 0 | 547,764,907 | 100% | ||
inanefool | 0 | 640,508,060 | 100% | ||
twentyseven | 0 | 549,053,800 | 100% | ||
sebastiengllmt | 0 | 547,795,278 | 100% | ||
tronthetechie | 0 | 8,642,675,506 | 100% | ||
sheikyerbouti | 0 | 549,171,812 | 100% | ||
mykdowling | 0 | 549,335,000 | 100% | ||
tychoxi | 0 | 16,430,549,204 | 100% | ||
transhiroshi | 0 | 513,984,902 | 100% | ||
howtosurvive | 0 | 548,317,576 | 100% | ||
marksheppard | 0 | 47,585,076,118 | 62% | ||
mstafford | 0 | 2,324,034,216 | 100% | ||
britchief | 0 | 2,775,214,019 | 50% | ||
saqibnazir | 0 | 196,979,487 | 100% | ||
marrc | 0 | 593,393,834 | 100% | ||
redfishpclef | 0 | 9,691,104 | 10% | ||
kuldarennika | 0 | 9,877,758 | 10% | ||
teslainvestor | 0 | 549,225,563 | 100% | ||
korsah | 0 | 250,136,153 | 100% | ||
benleemusic | 0 | 542,593,430 | 5% | ||
akpos | 0 | 14,057,011,509 | 100% | ||
g4fun | 0 | 465,864,680 | 100% | ||
richatvns | 0 | 2,363,978,575 | 0.5% | ||
travelhackerpro | 0 | 548,961,000 | 100% | ||
mapooo | 0 | 397,019,682 | 100% | ||
mokross | 0 | 550,191,332 | 100% | ||
heiasamahi | 0 | 548,946,317 | 100% | ||
xmepwnx | 0 | 9,831,758 | 10% | ||
syfaer | 0 | 548,639,698 | 100% | ||
evanrodgers | 0 | 901,725,109 | 50% | ||
ahowe444 | 0 | 548,335,418 | 100% | ||
luisfreitas | 0 | 548,317,576 | 100% | ||
cyberdemon531 | 0 | 21,710,335,573 | 20% | ||
hans-vader | 0 | 494,494,949 | 100% | ||
sbi3 | 0 | 24,423,186,707 | 2.15% | ||
pf-johnson | 0 | 550,191,332 | 100% | ||
cyrus33 | 0 | 260,536,264 | 0.5% | ||
mustang88 | 0 | 474,616,767 | 0.5% | ||
mepatriot | 0 | 25,586,458,602 | 50% | ||
icepee | 0 | 31,887,847,455 | 100% | ||
jidgabol | 0 | 208,093,350 | 100% | ||
cali914 | 0 | 247,385,444 | 0.5% | ||
payoutbot | 0 | 1,413,271,058 | 0.5% | ||
steeminati | 0 | 611,426,439 | 0.5% | ||
jbap85 | 0 | 345,080,360 | 0.5% | ||
nolimit909 | 0 | 1,505,085,295 | 0.5% | ||
marchforth | 0 | 897,203,059 | 0.5% | ||
gforce-x | 0 | 463,581,578 | 100% | ||
true2bigblue | 0 | 607,363,713 | 0.5% | ||
xyz002 | 0 | 407,624,798 | 100% |
I find it interesting how in this video, you're asking the question that is essentially; > "when will these small individuals polling under 2% get out of the way of the larger identities that are at +5%, +10%, +15% of the vote, and cede their share of the vote?" While in a video not long ago, the premise was; > "Independent political media channels are important and being railroaded -- despite only have 1~2% of viewer-shares. New, horrible policies enacted by Youtube are squeezing out the little guys, in favor of the larger organizations that already have 10~20~30% of viewer-share, and it's unjust and unhealthy for the ecosystem". *** Is there not a place or a valid reason for everyone to stay in the race? Similar to how independent media channels may have something special to contribute -- these (currently) low-polling individuals may have value to contribute to the discourse? EDIT: I wrote the comment above after only having watched the first 30~45 seconds of the video. Silly me. You made some good points throughout the course of the clip. Cheers!
author | mstafford |
---|---|
permlink | re-davidpakman-when-should-dems-polling-under-2-get-out-20190712t162418319z |
category | world |
json_metadata | {"tags":["world"],"app":"steempeak/1.14.1"} |
created | 2019-07-12 16:24:24 |
last_update | 2019-07-12 16:28:21 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2019-07-19 16:24:24 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 1,070 |
author_reputation | 63,425,345,982,192 |
root_title | "When Should Dems Polling Under 2% Get Out?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 88,211,254 |
net_rshares | 0 |