Using your theory, that would imply that people that post about Bitcoin have no vested (emotional) interest; making information, rather than pump-aganda that suits a vested agenda. In reality, I think most people posting about Bitcoin actually have a vested interest. why would anyone share anything about something that has absolutely no affect on them - other than the obvious desire to control what everyone else is doing?

If you had a ton of Bitcoin, you'd want to inform people of the benefits of owning it. If you own none and post information that positively reflects BTC, why? You likely won't ever do that without *some* interest in BTC. However, people that talk about only the negative side of coin - do not own it (obviously). 

I think it's fair to say most of the people pumping out the bad news and doom are either one or more of the following:
1. Pissed at themselves because they do not own BTC
2. They wish to alter/control the behavior of other people (for whatever reason)
3. They directly  financially benefit from decreased value of BTC (short position, accumulating more, manipulating markets)

I can't think of any other reason a human would have to talk about something they claim to express no interest in. **people do shit they don't want to do everyday - it's called working!** and they wouldn't do it if it stopped paying..LOL

What?? That's a strange conclusion to draw. Of course I have it.

I have bitcoin! :) But I also hold about 15 different cryptocurrencies

Imagine your bank account being seized by government force, maybe then you'll care.