<center>https://cdn.pixabay.com/photo/2021/01/17/22/03/vaccine-5926664_960_720.jpg</center>
Dr. H. Noorchashm served as a faculty member at the University of Pennsylvania, at Harvard Medical School and the Thomas Jefferson University Hospital. He is an immunologist who says that any move to try and mandate vaccination for Americans who have already recovered from the virus is [unscientific, unethical, and illegal](https://www.newsweek.com/joe-biden-vaccine-mandate-immunologist-regrets-vote-1628414). 

In multiple regions now we have seen employees file lawsuits over the vaccination mandate, some arguing that they have natural immunity. For one of those individuals at least in that fight they have already been successful, when a professor at George Mason was given an exemption because of his natural immunity. 

Now because of the aggressive mandate stance that Biden has taken,  Noorchashm says that he regrets voting for him and he isn't being shy about how unnecessary he allegedly thinks this sort of mandate is for those with natural immunity. 

### He argues that Americans who already have antibodies from an infection shouldn't [be forced] or told to get inoculated. 
<center></center>We might continue to see more people fight those mandates who have already been exposed and who are already supposed to have natural immunity. 

# Some health networks have already made that decision in allowing employees who do have natural immunity to defer from getting their vaccination.
<center></center> In some areas health authorities have suggested that little to no one should qualify for exemptions for religious or health reasons, which is a broad stance to take that seems to gravely discount the unique nature of each individual and the approach of individualized care over politically-driven service. 

[Some churches have already told](https://www.fox13now.com/news/coronavirus/lds-church-tells-california-leaders-to-not-approve-religious-exemption-to-covid-19-vaccine-mandates) their leaders not to approve of religious exemptions, arguing that there is no grounds for it, but of course you can find thousands of followers *who would disagree with that* interpretation of things.