>Ordinarily we’d be happy to see nation-states beginning to shatter. 

But a calm, peaceful world wouldn't help sell TDV's books, so we can't have that.

The UN has internet security?  I thought they had an open door policy.

One thing is for sure, no matter who wins tomorrow, TDV will claim that the sky is falling.

There are two post on my feed for those of you feeling paranoid enough. (:

>Paranoia makes whole populations manipulable. 

Man, that's like your best selling point!

>Over time, crisis after crisis, it builds globalism and creates cultural homogenization.

Actually so far, crisis after crisis, have strengthened the global system and the world is much more improved from before. I am sure you are familiar with the concept of antifragility.

>Just today, WikiLeaks claimed it had been hit with a Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack, supposedly to prevent it from distributing additional information that would prove negative to the Clinton camp.

But you...YOU...with your Mexico password network,...you know better what happened. Please, elaborate on the tinfoil.

>This is part of a much larger paranoiac atmosphere. Paranoia is running rampant in US federal elections. We recognize the paranoia because we've covered the trends that cause it for years.

You didn't write paranoia enough. You need more paranoia.

>This elite-sponsored narrative has deep roots. As we’ve shown it was painstakingly prepared throughout 2016. Most notable was the constant evolution and deepening of the so-called war on terror and its extension into the internet.

You do know that in respect to 75% of the planet that doesn't have food, water and shelter on a daily basis you look like the elite with your condo, expensive car, cigars, precious metals, luxury clothes..etc..and ironically you are spreading your own version of paranoia to profit. Now ain't the world small huh?

>In Europe, the “war on terror” has provided justification for sending millions of Muslims into Europe where they are causing increasing havoc. In the US, the foundational elements of increased paranoia also stem from “terrorism”, but have been played out most recently via the US presidential election.

You mean the same havoc as the first settlers of America or any other immigrant society that had a turbulant start? [ ps: You forgot to mention paranoia].

>Ordinarily we’d be happy to see nation-states beginning to shatter. But in this case, the disintegration of nation-states is an apparently purposeful exercise designed to create ever-larger global regions of control.

Rather the exact opposite happens. Communities brake into municipalities all over, being controlled with more direct democratic means. That's like the pinnacle of anarchy and the model seems to follow the Swiss one—pr better the one Gandhi envisioned where in practise you have small groups with direct control upon themselves. Sorry mate. You can't suck on the statism tit with a globalisation narrative. I guess you needed to twist the whole thing to find another selling point huh?

>And just today, the WikiLeaks report heightened the paranoia even more. In addition to WikiLeaks, the UN was supposedly hacked as well, but there is little to confirm those reports.
WikiLeaks claims have been debunked by Twitter itself. CSO Online reports that Twitter went dark for about 30 minutes on Monday morning and this sparked increasingly heightened - paranoiac - reports throughout the day.

Actually nothing "paranoic" happened. You are just reselling flashy titles to create attention. That's exactly what the elite-controlled media do. 

>Of course this paranoia is perfect and follows the traditional modus operandi of the elites which almost always involves them; creating a problem, inciting a reaction, and finally ends with them swooping in with a solution to save the day.

Wait. I thought the elite were "Destroying the world"?

>Everything about these elections has contributed to a heightening of tension. Hillary’s campaign has taken an adversarial stance toward the internet and its alternative media. She has all but stated she intends to start a war with Russia and perhaps Iran as well. Her economic policies are destabilizing despite stock markets’ apparent approval of them.
Trump began his campaign by saying negative things about Mexicans and vowing to build a wall. Since then his political prescriptions have varied wildly and his off-the-cuff remarks have alienated - and even terrified - as well as charmed. For millions in the US in contravention to stated immigration regulations, Trump’s anti-immigrant stance is panic-making. Paranoia may not even be a strong enough word.

You should know by now that the world is not run from politicians but from corporations. Politicians are puppets. No matter who gets elected nothing changes because both Trump and Hilary are a mirage. If you have studied the U.S constitution you should know that the strongest element of the U.S government is the congress. They can direct the president any way they want. U.S.A is a corporatist republic with vested economic interests all around the world. The presidents don't mean shit.

>Whoever wins tomorrow, the main result will be a heightening of the disturbing and destabilizing trends we follow and analyze. 

You keep using the word "destabilizing". I don't think it means what you think it means. Economies are build to be distabilising because they are spontaneously strunctured in a way that they complete cycles (much like in ecosystems you have drought, rain, fires etc). Sometimes they are in their highs', sometimes in their lows'. Having a "stable" economy is similar to having a socialist controlled economy. Nothing in the universe is stable, why should the economies be? You seem to contradict your own ideologies pal.

>Hillary meanwhile is a virtual template for our Shemitah and Jubilee Trends analysis. As Secretary of State she left a trail of violence and war throughout the Middle East. So you can expect ongoing economic and military chaos as part of a Hillary presidency. If Trump wins, the economic and market carnage could be just as deep and even more immediate.

Sure, sum the whole propagandish clusterfuck with some anti-semitism and point out that whatever happens, everything is fucked. Aren't you a profit now...sorry. I meant prophet.

>We’ll follow the elections closely tomorrow in order to generate more specific forecasts depending on the winner. 

Let me guess. Whoever wins the forecast th future will be "PARANOIA"!!!? "CHAOS??!!! ?DISTABILISATION?!!! Am I getting warmer?

>We’re experiencing an influx of subscribers with a need to be informed, as you can certainly understand.

No your are not, but thank you for trying to create phenomenical value like a cheap telemarketing show.

>Additionally, on election day only, Anarchapulco, the world’s largest anarcho-capitalist conference is offering a nearly 50% discount for those who register with bitcoin

Actually that's because no sane human being will be attending a tinfoiled circlejerk to fill your pockets. 

Like A Great Man Said Once:
"Fascinating stuff! Fascinating! I know I am using this word a lot but hey! Ain't it facinating!"

the montenegrin government had elections recently and there was internet pronlems and it was blamed on russia.

why is this trolololling about this offensive doom porn? have any of you people ever read any history books?

>Paranoia makes whole populations manipulable. Over time, crisis after crisis,

You mean like when you post about how the economy is going to collapse every other day?