![Image](https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-_BGDK6lfAUk/Wt6UkhoIO5I/AAAAAAAAEMg/zl2zlxDWcVkl3ZFUrxPoQY6PXTXAfch4ACLcBGAs/s1600/roach.jpg)




I say [cops are bad guys](http://blog.kentforliberty.com/2013/04/no-good-cops.html), but that is not a popular observation. Many people *desperately* want to cling to their belief that cops are good guys. Yeah, it's kind of pathetic, but that's how they are.



But there's a third position which I've seen hinted at that is about halfway between the two views. It deserves consideration.



It seems these people will *almost* admit that cops are bad guys. Maybe the best way to express it is they see cops as "*tough* guys" hired by "us" so they can be bad toward (freelance) bad guys on our behalf. Like a big brother who beats up our bully so we don't have to.



At least it's more honest than claiming cops are good guys. *That* claim is demonstrably absurd. This halfway claim is still a little sad.



It's an admission that the cop supporter isn't responsible or competent enough to handle his own problems. And that he's OK with innocent people getting hurt as long as he "feels safe".



Cops frequently beat up (or shoot, kidnap, or rob) the wrong person. People who weren't actually doing anything to anyone, but just minding their own business in a way someone else might not like. So beating them up is wrong. Killing them for defending themselves-- or trying to escape-- from a cop is *murder*.



If cops were even slightly on the right side, they would accept their responsibility when they [molest](http://blog.kentforliberty.com/2018/03/not-all-molestation-is-sexual.html) the innocent, and they would take the consequences (rather than allowing their "[tax](https://www.kentforliberty.com/taxation.html)" victims to pay for their crimes). Cops don't do this. Cops are *nasty*.


.

*Thank you for helping support [KentforLiberty.com](http://kentforliberty.com/index.html). 
[Donations and subscriptions](PayPal.Me/Dullhawk) are **always** appreciated!*