At the time, she was happy to answer my questions. She stood by her views opposing the COVID-19 vaccinations, contrary to the evidence. When I first texted her this time, she seemed open to discussing the idea of an interview. 

<center>https://cdn.pixabay.com/photo/2024/12/29/00/12/dog-9297049_640.jpg[Source](https://pixabay.com/photos/image-9297049/)</center>

She started her message with I trust you are well, considering how many COVID shots that you likely were deceived into taking. But then she decided against it and instead sent letters to me, also signed by Paloma's dad.

Faramars Shamirani Trite that they have evidence which quoted, substantiates that Paloma died as a direct result of medical interventions given without a confirmed diagnosis or lawful consent. I've not seen any evidence to support these claims. 



In the lletter they go on to accuse me and the BBC of promoting the COVID-19 vaccine, and they say it has been quotedas  linked by leading scientists, legal experts and whistleblowers to a biological weapon program.  

 They say any attempt to quote, misrepresent or distort Paloma's death will be treated as evidence of continuing institutional alignment with pharmaceutical narratives. I wrote to Paloma's mum and dad, Kate and Farimah Shamarani, after this separately, with different allegations raised in the series. Neither responded.

Doctor Tom Roakes from the Royal College of Radiologists never met Paloma, but describes what you'd expect to see in a patient who does not pursue conventional treatment fornon-Hodgkinn lymphoma.


As time goes by, you'd expect just to become generally more unwell, so losing weight, losing appetite, becoming more frail, less able to do things, until I guess with no treatment at al,l you'd end up dying just from the burden of cancer growing in your body. As does social media campaigner Dr. and cancer patient LizO'Riordann.