##### Related Articles: https://steemit.com/eos/@eos42/eos911-an-initiative-to-help-the-victims-of-phishing-attacks-register-eos-or-similar-phishing-methods https://steemit.com/eos/@eos42/we-re-working-to-save-up-to-1-million-eos-tokens-usd15m-from-registration-scams ## Background The EOS 911 initative is something that EOS42 have been actively involved with launching and assisting with over the last fortnight; details and background [can be found here](https://blog.eos42.io/eos911-recovery-process/). ## Arbitration Ruling With the EOSIO mainnet now launched, any EOS accounts compromised by the registration process through phishing scams and the like are now capable of being unlocked. The [EOS Core Arbitration Forum (ECAF)](https://eoscorearbitration.io/) had a submission filed, and Block Producers were today expecting to receive a ruling to action - as will be the standard process going forwards. The guidance today however was not a ruling, but complexity due to the mainnet launching so recently. With the EOSIO constitution not yet ratified by token holders, ECAF are not yet able to pass a ruling as a validated arbitrator. ## Block Producers Debate A Complex Decision Given the time sensitive nature of this case, Block Producers debated this difficult decision for over two hours today on a call. On the one hand we could protect token holders, on the other this on the surface appears a dramatic overstep of our role in the constitution and BP agreement, which is to be the *executor only* of arbitration decisions, not to also be judge and jury. EOS42 certainly had this initial view, but as a global group we all worked through this complex situation. As we said on the call, our own conclusion is that if a ratified EOS constitution and arbitration was in place, then it would indeed be a fundamental overstep of Block Producers to do more than action arbitration decisions. However this is not currently the case, so the question was whether we would freeze the tokens on 7 accounts identified as already unlocking (meaning potential thieves could appropriate funds in under 24hrs), to subsequently enable ECAF when able to review and pass a ruling - and protect token holders to the best of our ability. The Block Producers reviewed all evidence in full, which gives an *indication* that the legitimate owners have both proved their ownership and signalled their will for account suspension through [EOS 911](https://recovery.eos911.io). This is not the Block Producers passing any judgement on the merits of the case. ## Decision and Possible Future Decisions The Block Producers eventually reached a unanimous consensus to freeze the following 7 EOS accounts: ```ge2dmmrqgene``` ```gu2timbsguge``` ```ge4tsmzvgege``` ```gezdonzygage``` ```ha4tkobrgqge``` ```ha4tamjtguge``` ```gq4dkmzzhege``` These will be passed to ECAF to rule on through full due process subsequently. The group also agreed that should further potentially compromised accounts be unlocked during this period before the constitution is ratified, we will consider these and whether to freeze. ## The Need To Ratify The EOSIO Constitution EOS42 believe this was the right result and in the spirit of EOSIO, which is to be a governed blockchain that has the capability to protect token holders and property. We also believe that this reveals an immediate need for a community voting solution to ratify the EOSIO constitution. We are discussing today with other block producers and influential community contributors who have in-house development capablities, to start work on providing this to enable ECAF to be able to provide rulings as soon as possible. If anybody has any questions or concerns relating to today's decision please contact us, we are happy to address them. This article is intended to provide full transparency for the community. ## Socials >[Website](https://eos42.io) [Twitter](https://twitter.com/eos42io) [Telegram](https://t.me/eos42) [Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/eos42io/) [Youtube](https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8ZDYr5Qi-N_eTZIvo61dFw) [LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/company/eos42/?originalSubdomain=ca) [Weibo](https://m.weibo.cn/u/6527187504?uid=6527187504&luicode=10000011&lfid=1076036505308929) [Bihu](https://bihu.com/people/360597)  *EOS42 is an EOS Block Producer Candidate based in London, UK*
author | eos42 |
---|---|
permlink | eos42-statement-on-block-producer-decision-to-freeze-7-eos-accounts |
category | eosio |
json_metadata | {"tags":["eosio","eos","eos42","arbitration","decision"],"links":["https://steemit.com/eos/@eos42/eos911-an-initiative-to-help-the-victims-of-phishing-attacks-register-eos-or-similar-phishing-methods","https://steemit.com/eos/@eos42/we-re-working-to-save-up-to-1-million-eos-tokens-usd15m-from-registration-scams","https://blog.eos42.io/eos911-recovery-process/","https://eoscorearbitration.io/","https://recovery.eos911.io","https://eos42.io","https://twitter.com/eos42io","https://t.me/eos42","https://www.instagram.com/eos42io/","https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8ZDYr5Qi-N_eTZIvo61dFw","https://www.linkedin.com/company/eos42/?originalSubdomain=ca","https://m.weibo.cn/u/6527187504?uid=6527187504&luicode=10000011&lfid=1076036505308929","https://bihu.com/people/360597"],"app":"steemit/0.1","format":"markdown","image":["https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmSRmqsdxJhdADNSnt7SSZju1EzgSwVWrSFAcMHv7F6F8w/2018-06-10%2010.47.57.jpg"]} |
created | 2018-06-17 20:48:39 |
last_update | 2018-06-18 17:18:48 |
depth | 0 |
children | 44 |
last_payout | 2018-06-24 20:48:39 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 8.055 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 2.643 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 4,505 |
author_reputation | 630,977,013,082 |
root_title | "EOS42 Statement on Block Producer Decision to Freeze 7 EOS Accounts" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 61,139,996 |
net_rshares | 4,985,547,815,749 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
boatymcboatface | 0 | 1,328,431,728,588 | 100% | ||
ifttt | 0 | 6,187,244,216 | 100% | ||
theshell | 0 | 382,800,639,079 | 100% | ||
ashe-oro | 0 | 1,665,395,056,906 | 100% | ||
cmorton | 0 | 38,034,676,193 | 100% | ||
indykpol | 0 | 5,866,205,098 | 100% | ||
blhz | 0 | 19,781,986,824 | 100% | ||
edb | 0 | 5,105,341,975 | 20% | ||
steemitboard | 0 | 748,679,476 | 1% | ||
bhikkhu | 0 | 54,062,310,683 | 100% | ||
dannykass | 0 | 2,406,194,980 | 100% | ||
dhimmel | 0 | 71,407,311,560 | 20% | ||
slavix | 0 | 313,113,750,983 | 100% | ||
anamnesia | 0 | 417,992,070 | 100% | ||
twokings3queens | 0 | 601,234,542 | 100% | ||
linogoncalves | 0 | 610,285,209 | 100% | ||
samhinds | 0 | 12,590,347,906 | 100% | ||
malekalmsaddi | 0 | 135,292,758,499 | 100% | ||
tiphune | 0 | 525,805,757 | 100% | ||
thomasuk | 0 | 10,098,150,310 | 100% | ||
thomasbcox | 0 | 658,877,859 | 100% | ||
cheneats | 0 | 380,421,307 | 3.29% | ||
daviddivergent | 0 | 1,724,649,330 | 1% | ||
h3o2honeycomb | 0 | 692,053,491 | 100% | ||
kux | 0 | 203,463,466 | 100% | ||
eaglet | 0 | 822,351,679 | 100% | ||
rickfisher | 0 | 598,147,790 | 100% | ||
bastelwastl | 0 | 610,645,479 | 100% | ||
aclarkuk82 | 0 | 169,276,834 | 100% | ||
eosphere | 0 | 125,107,964,072 | 100% | ||
tsto | 0 | 967,125,789 | 100% | ||
mariusfebruary | 0 | 789,099,959,539 | 100% | ||
coolisland | 0 | 4,316,847,357 | 100% | ||
methoncrypto | 0 | 636,344,449 | 100% | ||
richreeve | 0 | 4,032,588,515 | 100% | ||
nowygold | 0 | 604,048,451 | 100% | ||
aireck | 0 | 600,955,526 | 100% | ||
blocktheory | 0 | 475,601,368 | 100% | ||
morshedalam | 0 | 368,792,594 | 100% |
Da dove iniziare ad usare la eos blockchain? Wallet?
author | alfiojj |
---|---|
permlink | re-eos42-eos42-statement-on-block-producer-decision-to-freeze-7-eos-accounts-20180618t171537309z |
category | eosio |
json_metadata | {"tags":["eosio"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2018-06-18 17:15:39 |
last_update | 2018-06-18 17:15:39 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2018-06-25 17:15:39 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 52 |
author_reputation | 3,550,054,558 |
root_title | "EOS42 Statement on Block Producer Decision to Freeze 7 EOS Accounts" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 61,252,030 |
net_rshares | 0 |
I don't know what to say. I bought one of the 7 accounts yesterday through a trade on bitrated.com. I had no idea that the account was involved in a scam. Am I now going to loose all my funds? I have the documentation to proove that it was a legitimate purchase in good faith. I really don't understand. I'm crying right now. This is a ton of money from me. I thought the blockchain is immutable. I'm confused and sad. I need your help.
author | anahita |
---|---|
permlink | re-eos42-eos42-statement-on-block-producer-decision-to-freeze-7-eos-accounts-20180618t084352910z |
category | eosio |
json_metadata | {"tags":["eosio"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2018-06-18 08:43:57 |
last_update | 2018-06-18 08:43:57 |
depth | 1 |
children | 23 |
last_payout | 2018-06-25 08:43:57 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 440 |
author_reputation | 23,731,336 |
root_title | "EOS42 Statement on Block Producer Decision to Freeze 7 EOS Accounts" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 61,198,984 |
net_rshares | 458,415,697 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
mythocurrency | 0 | 458,415,697 | 100% | ||
soleone | 0 | 0 | 0% |
I acted in good faith, I did my due diligence and did not loose my privte keys to a scam. Now I have to bear the costs for it? How should I know that the funds were involved in a scam? How is this fair?
author | anahita |
---|---|
permlink | re-anahita-re-eos42-eos42-statement-on-block-producer-decision-to-freeze-7-eos-accounts-20180618t085354010z |
category | eosio |
json_metadata | {"tags":["eosio"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2018-06-18 08:53:57 |
last_update | 2018-06-18 08:53:57 |
depth | 2 |
children | 3 |
last_payout | 2018-06-25 08:53:57 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 203 |
author_reputation | 23,731,336 |
root_title | "EOS42 Statement on Block Producer Decision to Freeze 7 EOS Accounts" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 61,199,887 |
net_rshares | 449,107,764 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
pingponghongkong | 0 | 0 | 0% | ||
mythocurrency | 0 | 449,107,764 | 100% |
which account? and which user on bitrated?
author | d4ve |
---|---|
permlink | re-anahita-re-anahita-re-eos42-eos42-statement-on-block-producer-decision-to-freeze-7-eos-accounts-20180618t150540768z |
category | eosio |
json_metadata | {"tags":["eosio"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2018-06-18 15:05:39 |
last_update | 2018-06-18 15:05:39 |
depth | 3 |
children | 1 |
last_payout | 2018-06-25 15:05:39 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 43 |
author_reputation | 207,587,355 |
root_title | "EOS42 Statement on Block Producer Decision to Freeze 7 EOS Accounts" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 61,237,113 |
net_rshares | 2,048,501,974 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
blockchain-nz | 0 | 2,048,501,974 | 100% |
It's not fair at all, and it's not how a supposedly decentralized organization should work. The only other type of entity that would have the unilateral power to freeze a users account is a centralized exchange. This sort of action could not be approved in the way that this was by a decentralized organization. It's therefore accurate to conclude, by definition, that the EOS blockchain is not at all decentralized. If you don't get to keep your tokens, then people are better off keeping their money in a bank rather than holding EOS tokens.
author | kobemaster |
---|---|
permlink | re-anahita-re-anahita-re-eos42-eos42-statement-on-block-producer-decision-to-freeze-7-eos-accounts-20180623t103009729z |
category | eosio |
json_metadata | {"tags":["eosio"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2018-06-23 10:30:09 |
last_update | 2018-06-23 10:30:09 |
depth | 3 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2018-06-30 10:30:09 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 545 |
author_reputation | 0 |
root_title | "EOS42 Statement on Block Producer Decision to Freeze 7 EOS Accounts" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 61,892,215 |
net_rshares | 0 |
Why would you ever buy an account instead of buying the tokens directly? How long have you been in cryptocurrency? Buying someone's private key should never done, IMO. How can that ever be in good faith?
author | lukestokes |
---|---|
permlink | re-anahita-re-eos42-eos42-statement-on-block-producer-decision-to-freeze-7-eos-accounts-20180618t181007977z |
category | eosio |
json_metadata | {"tags":["eosio"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2018-06-18 18:10:06 |
last_update | 2018-06-18 18:10:06 |
depth | 2 |
children | 18 |
last_payout | 2018-06-25 18:10:06 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 203 |
author_reputation | 556,640,380,599,219 |
root_title | "EOS42 Statement on Block Producer Decision to Freeze 7 EOS Accounts" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 61,257,834 |
net_rshares | 2,006,045,975 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
blockchain-nz | 0 | 2,006,045,975 | 100% |
I did not buy somebody's private keys. The seller transferreed their account to my public key by updating the "owner" and "active" permission for the account. The whole transaction was done through cleos (command line eos) and is completely trustless. You can see it here on the EOS blockchain: https://explorer.eoseco.com/transactions/04f63754b34f29a4f4b71f378fc648bede0b960b06c80e271ae63d76fa65878a I have been in the crypto space long enough in order to understand public-private key cryptography and how to verify a transaction that was published on a blockchain. On every other blockchain I know, if a transaction is mined it is valid. As I said, I made the transaction in good faith. I validated everything I could validate. I did not expose my private keys to any rouge software or compromised website. I did my due diligence. How should I possibly know that the account was from a phishing scam?
author | anahita |
---|---|
permlink | re-lukestokes-re-anahita-re-eos42-eos42-statement-on-block-producer-decision-to-freeze-7-eos-accounts-20180618t224514414z |
category | eosio |
json_metadata | {"tags":["eosio"],"links":["https://explorer.eoseco.com/transactions/04f63754b34f29a4f4b71f378fc648bede0b960b06c80e271ae63d76fa65878a"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2018-06-18 22:45:15 |
last_update | 2018-06-19 00:09:57 |
depth | 3 |
children | 14 |
last_payout | 2018-06-25 22:45:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 909 |
author_reputation | 23,731,336 |
root_title | "EOS42 Statement on Block Producer Decision to Freeze 7 EOS Accounts" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 61,283,523 |
net_rshares | 611,282,118 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
linkprince | 0 | 611,282,118 | 100% |
So, are you or any of the BP legitimate enough to judge if the buyer is in good faith or not. The buyer of the compromised account must act as an acknowledged/aware/experienced user (and will not be defended) while those who initially sent the money to that account will be protected by EOS good lords? Why?
author | dumpcry |
---|---|
permlink | re-lukestokes-re-anahita-re-eos42-eos42-statement-on-block-producer-decision-to-freeze-7-eos-accounts-20180618t224352715z |
category | eosio |
json_metadata | {"tags":["eosio"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2018-06-18 22:43:51 |
last_update | 2018-06-18 22:43:51 |
depth | 3 |
children | 2 |
last_payout | 2018-06-25 22:43:51 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.019 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.005 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 307 |
author_reputation | 270,140,967 |
root_title | "EOS42 Statement on Block Producer Decision to Freeze 7 EOS Accounts" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 61,283,432 |
net_rshares | 12,217,815,612 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
ianp | 0 | 12,217,815,612 | 100% |
Excellent! I applaud! The way this is being handled is nothing short of expert.
author | anamnesia |
---|---|
permlink | re-eos42-eos42-statement-on-block-producer-decision-to-freeze-7-eos-accounts-20180617t213852870z |
category | eosio |
json_metadata | {"tags":["eosio"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2018-06-17 21:38:51 |
last_update | 2018-06-17 21:38:51 |
depth | 1 |
children | 2 |
last_payout | 2018-06-24 21:38:51 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 79 |
author_reputation | 322,856,615,696 |
root_title | "EOS42 Statement on Block Producer Decision to Freeze 7 EOS Accounts" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 61,144,278 |
net_rshares | 122,557,720 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
eos42 | 0 | 122,557,720 | 100% |
Thank you, appreciated!
author | eos42 |
---|---|
permlink | re-anamnesia-re-eos42-eos42-statement-on-block-producer-decision-to-freeze-7-eos-accounts-20180617t231443513z |
category | eosio |
json_metadata | {"tags":["eosio"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2018-06-17 23:14:45 |
last_update | 2018-06-17 23:14:45 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2018-06-24 23:14:45 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 23 |
author_reputation | 630,977,013,082 |
root_title | "EOS42 Statement on Block Producer Decision to Freeze 7 EOS Accounts" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 61,152,081 |
net_rshares | 0 |
Can you please tell me why you believe this situation was handled "expertly", as you say? If EOS were a bank or a corporate-own exchange, I would agree that this action was handled swiftly and competently. But, EOS is not a bank. It's supposed to be a decentralized ecosystem. But from the evidence presented here, it appears a small group of 21 stakeholders centrally and privately decided to lock up other people's funds on what is supposed to be a decentralized blockchain. Supposedly stolen funds or not, this centralized decision could never happen on a network such as Bitcoin or many others because those networks are decentralized and no small group of actors have the power to take such as action. Due to this demonstration of power, we can no longer objectively consider EOS to be a decentralized blockchain. I would love to hear why anyone refutes what I'm saying.
author | kobemaster |
---|---|
permlink | re-anamnesia-re-eos42-eos42-statement-on-block-producer-decision-to-freeze-7-eos-accounts-20180623t104827570z |
category | eosio |
json_metadata | {"tags":["eosio"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2018-06-23 10:48:27 |
last_update | 2018-06-23 10:48:27 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2018-06-30 10:48:27 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 878 |
author_reputation | 0 |
root_title | "EOS42 Statement on Block Producer Decision to Freeze 7 EOS Accounts" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 61,894,033 |
net_rshares | 0 |
* BPs do not have any say in account freezings. * there is no voted & elected arbitrage committee This is a non-issue, everything you described is subject to stakeholder decision, **NOT** BP decision.
author | ash |
---|---|
permlink | re-eos42-eos42-statement-on-block-producer-decision-to-freeze-7-eos-accounts-20180618t090617583z |
category | eosio |
json_metadata | {"tags":["eosio"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2018-06-18 09:06:18 |
last_update | 2018-06-18 09:06:18 |
depth | 1 |
children | 5 |
last_payout | 2018-06-25 09:06:18 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.065 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.001 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 202 |
author_reputation | 286,803,743,324,398 |
root_title | "EOS42 Statement on Block Producer Decision to Freeze 7 EOS Accounts" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 61,201,108 |
net_rshares | 31,426,267,442 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
corina | 0 | 18,425,285,393 | 94% | ||
dreamzchm | 0 | 4,570,908,928 | 100% | ||
scorum.community | 0 | 7,827,960,235 | 100% | ||
linkprince | 0 | 602,112,886 | 100% |
We agree that under normal circumstances once the EOSIO constitution is ratified by token holders, and we have ECAF as the enabled arbitration service, Block Producers should and will not have any say in such matters - we will just execute such orders. If we as BP's do nothing, it is total abdication which goes back to "code is law" with all its limitations as we see with Ethereum for example. Our decision to act to enable arbitration to take place on the case is the BP's attempting to follow governance to the best degree possible. There is no good answer, only least bad. We all take this very seriously, and the BP's have already filed yesterday an arbitration case with ECAF against ourselves (submitted by Rick Schlesinger of EOS New York on our collective behalf).
author | eos42 |
---|---|
permlink | re-ash-re-eos42-eos42-statement-on-block-producer-decision-to-freeze-7-eos-accounts-20180618t144756204z |
category | eosio |
json_metadata | {"tags":["eosio"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2018-06-18 14:47:57 |
last_update | 2018-06-18 14:47:57 |
depth | 2 |
children | 4 |
last_payout | 2018-06-25 14:47:57 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 781 |
author_reputation | 630,977,013,082 |
root_title | "EOS42 Statement on Block Producer Decision to Freeze 7 EOS Accounts" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 61,234,867 |
net_rshares | 0 |
BPs are here to run the network, and act on orders as per stakeholders votings. not to do some shady backyard deals
author | ash |
---|---|
permlink | re-eos42-re-ash-re-eos42-eos42-statement-on-block-producer-decision-to-freeze-7-eos-accounts-20180618t152511777z |
category | eosio |
json_metadata | {"tags":["eosio"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2018-06-18 15:25:12 |
last_update | 2018-06-18 15:25:12 |
depth | 3 |
children | 3 |
last_payout | 2018-06-25 15:25:12 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.047 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 115 |
author_reputation | 286,803,743,324,398 |
root_title | "EOS42 Statement on Block Producer Decision to Freeze 7 EOS Accounts" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 61,239,385 |
net_rshares | 23,058,210,086 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
mythocurrency | 0 | 465,396,647 | 100% | ||
scilwa | 0 | 7,250,885,999 | 24% | ||
tam-lin | 0 | 4,294,384,873 | 19% | ||
sunrock | 0 | 4,533,753,403 | 47% | ||
farhankhann | 0 | 4,580,919,900 | 59% | ||
kimumu | 0 | 1,932,869,264 | 40% |
EOS42 is a bitfinex sponsored block producer. Nothing credible about them at all.
author | cigarbutts |
---|---|
permlink | re-eos42-eos42-statement-on-block-producer-decision-to-freeze-7-eos-accounts-20180627t015755660z |
category | eosio |
json_metadata | {"tags":["eosio"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2018-06-27 01:58:00 |
last_update | 2018-06-27 01:58:00 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2018-07-04 01:58:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 81 |
author_reputation | 123,641,758,833 |
root_title | "EOS42 Statement on Block Producer Decision to Freeze 7 EOS Accounts" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 62,420,348 |
net_rshares | 0 |
Thank you so much eos42. My account is on the list. If only the scammer would have voted for you with my tokens as well.
author | d4ve |
---|---|
permlink | re-eos42-eos42-statement-on-block-producer-decision-to-freeze-7-eos-accounts-20180617t234817683z |
category | eosio |
json_metadata | {"tags":["eosio"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2018-06-17 23:48:18 |
last_update | 2018-06-17 23:48:18 |
depth | 1 |
children | 1 |
last_payout | 2018-06-24 23:48:18 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 122 |
author_reputation | 207,587,355 |
root_title | "EOS42 Statement on Block Producer Decision to Freeze 7 EOS Accounts" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 61,154,600 |
net_rshares | 1,376,161,755 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
d4ve | 0 | 0 | 100% | ||
thomasbcox | 0 | 645,700,302 | 100% | ||
rickfisher | 0 | 610,354,887 | 100% | ||
eos42 | 0 | 120,106,566 | 100% |
Thank you for your support. Protecting token holders and property is a fundamental responsibility of the community collectively. We hope to not be in this position for long, and for ECAF to be fully active.
author | eos42 |
---|---|
permlink | re-d4ve-re-eos42-eos42-statement-on-block-producer-decision-to-freeze-7-eos-accounts-20180618t021902045z |
category | eosio |
json_metadata | {"tags":["eosio"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2018-06-18 02:19:00 |
last_update | 2018-06-18 14:50:30 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2018-06-25 02:19:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 207 |
author_reputation | 630,977,013,082 |
root_title | "EOS42 Statement on Block Producer Decision to Freeze 7 EOS Accounts" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 61,166,107 |
net_rshares | 0 |
Super. Letβs fast track the ractification of the constitution
author | donelagra |
---|---|
permlink | re-eos42-eos42-statement-on-block-producer-decision-to-freeze-7-eos-accounts-20180618t085600995z |
category | eosio |
json_metadata | {"tags":["eosio"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2018-06-18 08:56:00 |
last_update | 2018-06-18 08:56:00 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2018-06-25 08:56:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 61 |
author_reputation | 1,914,964 |
root_title | "EOS42 Statement on Block Producer Decision to Freeze 7 EOS Accounts" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 61,200,093 |
net_rshares | 122,557,720 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
eos42 | 0 | 122,557,720 | 100% |
so complicated.
author | jimmyfotogallery |
---|---|
permlink | re-eos42-eos42-statement-on-block-producer-decision-to-freeze-7-eos-accounts-20180621t161204761z |
category | eosio |
json_metadata | {"tags":["eosio"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2018-06-21 16:14:00 |
last_update | 2018-06-21 16:14:00 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2018-06-28 16:14:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 15 |
author_reputation | 18,673,077,616,848 |
root_title | "EOS42 Statement on Block Producer Decision to Freeze 7 EOS Accounts" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 0 |
post_id | 61,660,904 |
net_rshares | 2,454,978,862 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
jimmyfotogallery | 0 | 2,454,978,862 | 100% |
I think there's a larger discussion to be had here regarding the EOS Constitution itself which, currently, isn't even a real contract. I hope we can <a href="https://steemit.com/eos/@lukestokes/let-s-make-the-eos-constitution-an-actual-contract">start talking about that openly and work to fix it</a>. Until we do, any action taken based on the constitution or the arbitration it references is kind of an empty gesture.
author | lukestokes |
---|---|
permlink | re-eos42-eos42-statement-on-block-producer-decision-to-freeze-7-eos-accounts-20180618t200348973z |
category | eosio |
json_metadata | {"tags":["eosio"],"links":["https://steemit.com/eos/@lukestokes/let-s-make-the-eos-constitution-an-actual-contract"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2018-06-18 20:03:48 |
last_update | 2018-06-18 20:03:48 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2018-06-25 20:03:48 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 419 |
author_reputation | 556,640,380,599,219 |
root_title | "EOS42 Statement on Block Producer Decision to Freeze 7 EOS Accounts" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 61,268,862 |
net_rshares | 2,122,799,973 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
blockchain-nz | 0 | 2,122,799,973 | 100% | ||
gray00 | 0 | 0 | 100% |
Block Producers job is to be decided by block producers not by anyone else.. tokens holders job is to judge this job by voting not by complaining.. Once there are enough tools and awareness available to every token holders... block producers will have no options but to do whatever the community would approve. I agree with what BPs did, because that's their decisions and till voting change them "if they were not elected".. i believe they will keep trying to do things that will eventually be generally approved by the community.. this is not centralization, but because there were no proper election yet.. BPs are still close to each others and the decisions can get easy consensus.. which i don't believe it would be as easy in the future
author | malekalmsaddi |
---|---|
permlink | re-eos42-eos42-statement-on-block-producer-decision-to-freeze-7-eos-accounts-20180619t172219056z |
category | eosio |
json_metadata | {"tags":["eosio"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2018-06-19 17:22:21 |
last_update | 2018-06-19 17:22:21 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2018-06-26 17:22:21 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.407 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 746 |
author_reputation | 2,690,897,839,449 |
root_title | "EOS42 Statement on Block Producer Decision to Freeze 7 EOS Accounts" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 61,386,227 |
net_rshares | 194,841,236,449 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
jdc | 0 | 4,729,579,428 | 88% | ||
hashing247.com | 0 | 26,123,850,941 | 48% | ||
malekalmsaddi | 0 | 137,585,856,101 | 100% | ||
k3nb0b | 0 | 22,302,255,748 | 100% | ||
nikossa1908 | 0 | 4,099,694,231 | 100% |
BP's will certainly have to work hard for their blocks now this precedent has been set. They've potentially increased their workload by 1000x as EOS gets bigger. Oh dear! However, I agree with the freeze.
author | richreeve |
---|---|
permlink | re-eos42-eos42-statement-on-block-producer-decision-to-freeze-7-eos-accounts-20180617t222202787z |
category | eosio |
json_metadata | {"tags":["eosio"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2018-06-17 22:22:03 |
last_update | 2018-06-17 22:22:03 |
depth | 1 |
children | 1 |
last_payout | 2018-06-24 22:22:03 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 204 |
author_reputation | 104,864,378,366 |
root_title | "EOS42 Statement on Block Producer Decision to Freeze 7 EOS Accounts" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 61,147,991 |
net_rshares | 120,719,355 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
eos42 | 0 | 120,719,355 | 100% |
As soon as the community ratifies the constitution, we will have all of the rules and mechanics of a governed blockchain in place as originally envisaged - including the all important arbitration service. Hopefully this will ensure the workload aside from running the network efficiently does not increase exponentially as we will be merely executing such cases without needing debates or interim measures like this.
author | eos42 |
---|---|
permlink | re-richreeve-re-eos42-eos42-statement-on-block-producer-decision-to-freeze-7-eos-accounts-20180617t231413062z |
category | eosio |
json_metadata | {"tags":["eosio"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2018-06-17 23:14:15 |
last_update | 2018-06-17 23:14:15 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2018-06-24 23:14:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 419 |
author_reputation | 630,977,013,082 |
root_title | "EOS42 Statement on Block Producer Decision to Freeze 7 EOS Accounts" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 61,152,037 |
net_rshares | 4,157,307,747 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
richreeve | 0 | 4,157,307,747 | 100% |
Congratulations @eos42! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) : [](http://steemitboard.com/@eos42) Award for the number of upvotes received <sub>_Click on the badge to view your Board of Honor._</sub> <sub>_If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word_ `STOP`</sub> To support your work, I also upvoted your post! **Do not miss the [last post](https://steemit.com/steemitboard/@steemitboard/steemitboard-world-cup-contest-tunisia-vs-england) from @steemitboard!** --- **Participate in the [SteemitBoard World Cup Contest](https://steemit.com/steemitboard/@steemitboard/steemitboard-world-cup-contest-collect-badges-and-win-free-sbd)!** Collect World Cup badges and win free SBD Support the Gold Sponsors of the contest: [@good-karma](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=good-karma&approve=1) and [@lukestokes](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=lukestokes.mhth&approve=1) --- > Do you like [SteemitBoard's project](https://steemit.com/@steemitboard)? Then **[Vote for its witness](https://v2.steemconnect.com/sign/account-witness-vote?witness=steemitboard&approve=1)** and **get one more award**!
author | steemitboard |
---|---|
permlink | steemitboard-notify-eos42-20180618t092952000z |
category | eosio |
json_metadata | {"image":["https://steemitboard.com/img/notify.png"]} |
created | 2018-06-18 09:29:51 |
last_update | 2018-06-18 09:29:51 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2018-06-25 09:29:51 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 1,331 |
author_reputation | 38,975,615,169,260 |
root_title | "EOS42 Statement on Block Producer Decision to Freeze 7 EOS Accounts" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 61,203,144 |
net_rshares | 0 |