RE: Bitshares (BTS): Lower Low was Marked; Is a Breakout Next? by erit2018

bitshares · @erit2018 · Feb 7 '18 (edited)

XVG:
![](https://steemitimages.com/DQmbUfy6F1GgP9fGppaTZSuNLNYSoNHqRtkpvUV1TZyU1os/image.png)


IOTA:
![](https://steemitimages.com/DQmTyYT44PdoBdwwR1RwgbsBYo4dUev6AhZicfvq5k1Q2Ev/image.png)

BNB: 
![](https://steemitimages.com/DQmc7TvK43ov6dyNmGKrm9TXw6wgDd3M48eb1NphsA1gAjb/image.png)

RIght on, so your Primary is no longer a lower low across the board? If your primary for BTS is that's it's done the wedge ---- I'll presume BTC/LTC/XVG are all the same pattern :) let's get impulsive tonight..

For example, Verge, IOTA, and BNB seem to be all in the exact same boat; we're either at the bottom or they all need to do another lower-low along with BTC.

👍 masterofcoin, cannonball6, dannyk30yrpt, erit2018
👎 thecyclist, iflagtrash, randomthoughts, ngc, danknugs, theyeti, thesloth, rewardpoolrape, berniesanders, the.bot, ozchartart, nextgencrypto, engagement, thedelegator

`author`	erit2018
`permlink`	re-haejin-bitshares-bts-lower-low-was-marked-is-a-breakout-next-20180207t215757394z
`category`	bitshares
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["bitshares"],"image":["https://steemitimages.com/DQmbUfy6F1GgP9fGppaTZSuNLNYSoNHqRtkpvUV1TZyU1os/image.png","https://steemitimages.com/DQmTyYT44PdoBdwwR1RwgbsBYo4dUev6AhZicfvq5k1Q2Ev/image.png","https://steemitimages.com/DQmc7TvK43ov6dyNmGKrm9TXw6wgDd3M48eb1NphsA1gAjb/image.png"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2018-02-07 21:57:57
`last_update`	2018-02-07 21:58:42
`depth`	1
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2018-02-14 21:57:57
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	656
`author_reputation`	127,729,275,875
`root_title`	"Bitshares (BTS): Lower Low was Marked; Is a Breakout Next?"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	35,758,786
`net_rshares`	-169,725,943,523
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (18)

voter	rshares	pct
berniesanders	-2,209,929,950	-2%
nextgencrypto	-742,702,509	-2%
danknugs	-9,804,873,376	-2%
the.bot	-2,159,207,015	-2%
ozchartart	-1,856,164,919	-2%
thecyclist	-94,726,807,501	-2%
engagement	-218,614,871	-2%
iflagtrash	-24,649,872,782	-2%
theyeti	-6,722,354,739	-2%
randomthoughts	-13,521,160,010	-2%
cannonball6	608,355,000	100%
thedelegator	-197,122,046	-2%
thesloth	-3,447,841,606	-2%
masterofcoin	3,612,542,383	20%
ngc	-12,044,723,608	-2%
dannyk30yrpt	485,739,400	100%
rewardpoolrape	-2,300,040,064	-2%
erit2018	168,834,690	100%

`author`	haejin
`permlink`	re-erit2018-re-haejin-bitshares-bts-lower-low-was-marked-is-a-breakout-next-20180207t231829820z
`category`	bitshares
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["bitshares"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2018-02-07 23:18:30
`last_update`	2018-02-07 23:18:30
`depth`	2
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2018-02-14 23:18:30
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	22
`author_reputation`	5,313,872,769,838,176
`root_title`	"Bitshares (BTS): Lower Low was Marked; Is a Breakout Next?"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	35,772,144
`net_rshares`	1,656,463,274
`author_curate_reward`	""

voter	rshares	pct
ztl-85	614,744,564	100%
erit2018	427,259,880	100%
originaljack	614,458,830	100%