RE: Autovoter maximizers or content patrons? by evolved08gsr

View this thread on: hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com

Viewing a response to: @tarazkp/autovoter-maximizers-or-content-patrons

hive-167922 · @evolved08gsr · Mar 30 '21

$0.21

Bot votes need to be removed. (Full Stop)

Live human votes or no votes. It's a simple solution to finding more adoption and rewarding ACTIVE accounts on the blockchain. DPoS is already shunned by the crypto community as a sham and joining late is disadvantageous to most (small) users who join. Pay to Play is not how Hive will thrive. That model is more successful elsewhere.

Until hive solves that problem, ~~Steem~~ Hive will continue to have minimal growth and adoption. It's not like people haven't stumbled upon this platform for the last 4+ years...

But greed is good for those who have the most Hive Power...

👍 tarazkp, babytarazkp

`author`	evolved08gsr
`permlink`	re-tarazkp-qqt246
`category`	hive-167922
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["hive-167922"],"app":"peakd/2021.03.9"}
`created`	2021-03-30 23:19:18
`last_update`	2021-03-30 23:19:18
`depth`	1
`children`	2
`last_payout`	2021-04-06 23:19:18
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.104 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.104 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	619
`author_reputation`	4,411,583,250,238
`root_title`	"Autovoter maximizers or content patrons?"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	102,711,691
`net_rshares`	324,178,254,719
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (2)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
tarazkp	0 B		323,645,276,948	5%
babytarazkp	0 B		532,977,771	10%

@tarazkp · Mar 31 '21

I disagree. I am an active account and perhaps one of the most active, I use autos. I don't think I am killing Hive in doing so. 

How is this related to Pay to play? Do you mean because people can buy if they choose and use autos to earn?

Posted Using [LeoFinance <sup>Beta</sup>](https://leofinance.io/@tarazkp/re-evolved08gsr-3phwbr)

properties (22)

`author`	tarazkp
`permlink`	re-evolved08gsr-3phwbr
`category`	hive-167922
`json_metadata`	{"app":"leofinance/0.2","format":"markdown","tags":["hive-167922","leofinance"],"canonical_url":"https://leofinance.io/@tarazkp/re-evolved08gsr-3phwbr"}
`created`	2021-03-31 05:35:39
`last_update`	2021-03-31 05:35:39
`depth`	2
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2021-04-07 05:35:39
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	337
`author_reputation`	5,937,806,939,225,118
`root_title`	"Autovoter maximizers or content patrons?"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	102,716,882
`net_rshares`	0

@evolved08gsr · Apr 4 '21

You are more of the exception than the rule. You spend your time as an active account and use auto voting (which I still disagree with) as a way to provide yourself with more time to produce content and reply to comments.

Most who auto vote do not produce content to the same extent as you, nor do they engage with their commenters as much as you do.

A social platform cannot be managed via bots- look at how much everyone hates facebook because of their AI influence (and many many other reasons). Hive has barely 1/1,000,000 the investment in algorithms versus FB and even more basic algorithms, which is not a good thing. People are the value on Hive (until leo finance can prove otherwise) - bots (including voting trails) have only diminished the value of Hive and have only created more problems than they've solved.

Bots are used by virtue of laziness - or monetary incentivization (votes = reward potential). Quality is a secondary (or a much lower) consideration with bots. Which defeats the purpose of a social platform, which is meant to reward the "best" content vs. the "most popular" content.

properties (22)