Things that STEEMIT should implement to eliminate: multiple accounts, bots, upvoting groups, garbage posts, etc... by fogspam

View this thread on: hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com

steemit · @fogspam · Jul 29 '16

$0.09

Things that STEEMIT should implement to eliminate: multiple accounts, bots, upvoting groups, garbage posts, etc...

<h1><img src="https://news.bitcoin.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Steemit-Distributes-1.3-Million-to-its-Social-Media-Community.jpg" /></h1>
<h1>1. One account per user with identity verification:</h1>
<p>     In my opinion, if STEEMIT wants to gain trust and bring more people that are willing to invest, they should implement this feature. Think about it:</p>
<ul>
  <li>bots will disapear</li>
  <li>users will think twice before breaking the rules that are imposed by STEEMIT (spam, plagiarism, beggers of upvote, etc...)</li>
  <li>people who introduce themselves are who they say they are </li>
</ul>
<p>(i know manny of you may not agree with this, but if your intention are good here, it should not be a problem for you)</p>
<h1>2. User feedback:</h1>
<p>     This feature will help us make the difference betwen good blogers and garbage blogers, so when we search the new posts, we will have the option to separate them.</p>
<h1>3. Posting fee:</h1>
<p>     Finaly STEEMIT should implement a posting fee (1$-10$ per post, idont know, something like that) I know many of you will not agree with me but again, if your intentions are good that should not bother you, but imagine that the quality of the posts will highly rise. There wont be stupid posts anymore, and if you know your post will generate earnings this fee should not be a problem.</p>
<p>Please let me know what you think about this guys, i am waiting for your opinins. Wish you all the best.</p>
<p>#steemit  #security #bots #badposts </p>

👍 biophil, thecryptofiend, elyaque, jayjustmay, cm-steem, andreynoch, dkpl, kennyskitchen, sunking, tee-em, viscount0071, soupernerd, userx, weenis, nurik, nicoleta, fogspam, emilyelizabeth, steemit.tips, chonesta, abctrade, steemlove, steemitlove, corax, angevel, cheremet, countrytalented, daysaiyan, cozyone123, curls4life, crumaner, anarchypory, backetri, alniskobs, amboyst, daysmega, daysmega1421, dotersvilic, eternalabove, eleiminer, hxclife, sugarfromhell, gaspot, forgetthefallen, etccrap, yandra86, rottennasty, bignastywhale, softpunk, gunpower, feeltheblade, silvesterstay, joujou666, praisenoone, rickydevil, redddet, catirabella, redredwinewine
👎 question-answers

`author`	fogspam
`permlink`	things-that-steemit-should-implement-to-eliminate-multiple-accounts-bots-upvoting-groups-garbage-posts-etc
`category`	steemit
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steemit","security","ideas"],"image":["https://news.bitcoin.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Steemit-Distributes-1.3-Million-to-its-Social-Media-Community.jpg"]}
`created`	2016-07-29 14:41:42
`last_update`	2016-07-29 14:41:42
`depth`	0
`children`	12
`last_payout`	2016-08-29 10:41:48
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.075 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.017 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	1,511
`author_reputation`	2,200,070,551,939
`root_title`	"Things that STEEMIT should implement to eliminate: multiple accounts, bots, upvoting groups, garbage posts, etc..."
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	465,504
`net_rshares`	53,921,329,807
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (59)

voter	rshares	pct
thecryptofiend	8,352,730,756	100%
cm-steem	1,625,950,092	100%
kennyskitchen	1,129,892,367	100%
tee-em	295,724,128	100%
soupernerd	56,519,353	1%
elyaque	6,895,461,424	100%
sunking	458,519,355	100%
biophil	30,526,359,552	100%
fogspam	4,878,081	0%
dkpl	1,338,856,545	100%
jayjustmay	1,834,602,004	100%
nicoleta	26,329,313	100%
emilyelizabeth	4,256,286	1%
andreynoch	1,459,453,148	100%
weenis	55,457,639	1%
steemitlove	1,277,435	1%
steemlove	1,283,024	1%
nurik	27,845,911	100%
question-answers	-342,620,379	-100%
viscount0071	64,028,795	100%
steemit.tips	2,846,658	1%
userx	55,468,537	100%
curls4life	1,237,709	1%
alniskobs	1,236,422	1%
amboyst	1,236,413	1%
cheremet	1,244,069	1%
anarchypory	1,237,141	1%
angevel	1,247,182	1%
backetri	1,237,101	1%
chonesta	1,563,167	1%
countrytalented	1,241,049	1%
cozyone123	1,238,610	1%
crumaner	1,237,392	1%
daysaiyan	1,238,995	1%
daysmega	1,234,910	1%
daysmega1421	1,234,097	1%
dotersvilic	1,234,087	1%
eternalabove	1,234,073	1%
corax	1,248,087	100%
sugarfromhell	1,228,844	1%
gaspot	1,228,835	1%
forgetthefallen	1,228,825	1%
eleiminer	1,232,854	1%
etccrap	1,228,746	1%
abctrade	1,552,371	1%
yandra86	1,228,697	1%
hxclife	1,229,486	1%
rottennasty	1,228,671	1%
bignastywhale	1,228,658	1%
feeltheblade	1,222,361	1%
silvesterstay	1,222,338	1%
joujou666	1,220,710	1%
praisenoone	1,219,891	1%
rickydevil	1,219,879	1%
softpunk	1,224,308	1%
redddet	1,219,858	1%
catirabella	1,219,843	1%
redredwinewine	1,219,834	1%
gunpower	1,224,270	1%

@biophil · Jul 29 '16

I've been kicking around some ideas for verification, because it would help make a lot of things easier. You could conceivably pay verified accounts more, for one thing.

👍 fogspam

`author`	biophil
`permlink`	re-fogspam-things-that-steemit-should-implement-to-eliminate-multiple-accounts-bots-upvoting-groups-garbage-posts-etc-20160729t224559118z
`category`	steemit
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steemit"]}
`created`	2016-07-29 22:45:57
`last_update`	2016-07-29 22:45:57
`depth`	1
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2016-08-29 10:41:48
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	169
`author_reputation`	45,223,914,794,461
`root_title`	"Things that STEEMIT should implement to eliminate: multiple accounts, bots, upvoting groups, garbage posts, etc..."
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	476,284
`net_rshares`	234,669,901
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
fogspam	0 B		234,669,901	100%

@fogspam · Jul 30 '16

Yup.

properties (22)

`author`	fogspam
`permlink`	re-biophil-re-fogspam-things-that-steemit-should-implement-to-eliminate-multiple-accounts-bots-upvoting-groups-garbage-posts-etc-20160730t002043340z
`category`	steemit
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steemit"]}
`created`	2016-07-30 00:20:39
`last_update`	2016-07-30 00:20:39
`depth`	2
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2016-08-29 10:41:48
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	4
`author_reputation`	2,200,070,551,939
`root_title`	"Things that STEEMIT should implement to eliminate: multiple accounts, bots, upvoting groups, garbage posts, etc..."
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	477,477
`net_rshares`	0

@corax · Jul 29 '16

Your style is so unique in comparison to other people I have read stuff from. Thank you for posting when you have the opportunity, Guess I will just bookmark this steem account http://media0.giphy.com/media/4GRRBtKrdiFDa/giphy.gif

👍 helper
👎 stats, antispam

`author`	corax
`permlink`	things-that-steemit-should-implement-to-eliminate-multiple-accounts-bots-upvoting-groups-garbage-posts-etc
`category`	steemit
`json_metadata`	""
`created`	2016-07-29 14:42:21
`last_update`	2016-07-29 14:42:21
`depth`	1
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2016-08-29 10:41:48
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	230
`author_reputation`	-764,851,638,914
`root_title`	"Things that STEEMIT should implement to eliminate: multiple accounts, bots, upvoting groups, garbage posts, etc..."
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	465,521
`net_rshares`	-62,560,693
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (3)

voter	rshares	pct
antispam	-8,136,951	-10%
helper	4,862,004	100%
stats	-59,285,746	-100%

@cryptobarry · Jul 29 '16

$0.05

Maybe some sort of transaction fee after you submit more than 4 blog posts per day. I think that is a limit the developers have initiated.

👍 biophil

`author`	cryptobarry
`permlink`	re-fogspam-things-that-steemit-should-implement-to-eliminate-multiple-accounts-bots-upvoting-groups-garbage-posts-etc-20160729t144428401z
`category`	steemit
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steemit"]}
`created`	2016-07-29 14:44:24
`last_update`	2016-07-29 14:44:24
`depth`	1
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2016-08-29 10:41:48
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.041 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.011 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	138
`author_reputation`	4,967,488,810,714
`root_title`	"Things that STEEMIT should implement to eliminate: multiple accounts, bots, upvoting groups, garbage posts, etc..."
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	465,596
`net_rshares`	30,526,359,552
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
biophil	0 B		30,526,359,552	100%

@fogspam · Jul 29 '16

Yes, that is also a good idea !

properties (22)

`author`	fogspam
`permlink`	re-cryptobarry-re-fogspam-things-that-steemit-should-implement-to-eliminate-multiple-accounts-bots-upvoting-groups-garbage-posts-etc-20160729t150411038z
`category`	steemit
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steemit"]}
`created`	2016-07-29 15:04:06
`last_update`	2016-07-29 15:04:06
`depth`	2
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2016-08-29 10:41:48
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	31
`author_reputation`	2,200,070,551,939
`root_title`	"Things that STEEMIT should implement to eliminate: multiple accounts, bots, upvoting groups, garbage posts, etc..."
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	466,191
`net_rshares`	0

@desmonid · Jul 29 '16

These are all solid ideas, I think *#1 identity verification* is the best idea and I've already expressed frustration to my friends that people with a multitude of accounts would only open the extra accounts if they feel there is an advantage to doing so. 

In *my* view the presence of people with an order of magnitude more accounts than anyone else is fundamentally unhealthy for the platform, I've already personally experienced being attacked by a down vote bot.

👍 desmonid, fogspam
👎 tie-warutho

`author`	desmonid
`permlink`	re-fogspam-things-that-steemit-should-implement-to-eliminate-multiple-accounts-bots-upvoting-groups-garbage-posts-etc-20160729t233401989z
`category`	steemit
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steemit"]}
`created`	2016-07-29 23:34:03
`last_update`	2016-07-29 23:34:03
`depth`	1
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2016-08-29 10:41:48
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	467
`author_reputation`	1,795,616,951,424
`root_title`	"Things that STEEMIT should implement to eliminate: multiple accounts, bots, upvoting groups, garbage posts, etc..."
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	476,891
`net_rshares`	-1,946,189,649
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (3)

voter	rshares	pct
tie-warutho	-2,669,978,367	-100%
fogspam	239,558,858	100%
desmonid	484,229,860	100%

@fogspam · Jul 30 '16

Maybe they will implment it soon.

👍 desmonid

`author`	fogspam
`permlink`	re-desmonid-re-fogspam-things-that-steemit-should-implement-to-eliminate-multiple-accounts-bots-upvoting-groups-garbage-posts-etc-20160730t002005956z
`category`	steemit
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steemit"]}
`created`	2016-07-30 00:20:03
`last_update`	2016-07-30 00:20:03
`depth`	2
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2016-08-29 10:41:48
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	33
`author_reputation`	2,200,070,551,939
`root_title`	"Things that STEEMIT should implement to eliminate: multiple accounts, bots, upvoting groups, garbage posts, etc..."
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	477,472
`net_rshares`	468,609,542
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
desmonid	0 B		468,609,542	100%

@jayjustmay · Jul 29 '16

I like this.. though I'm with the rest on the fee, that would kill so many people's accounts really quick, especially the newbies.

I posted this, just in case you were interested to see it. Maybe if some collaboration were done among all the ideas people had some sort of plan could be put in action to snub these stupid bots.

https://steemit.com/steemit/@jayjustmay/attack-of-the-blockchain-bots-and-potentially-how-to-deal-with-them

properties (22)

`author`	jayjustmay
`permlink`	re-fogspam-things-that-steemit-should-implement-to-eliminate-multiple-accounts-bots-upvoting-groups-garbage-posts-etc-20160729t204424296z
`category`	steemit
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steemit"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steemit/@jayjustmay/attack-of-the-blockchain-bots-and-potentially-how-to-deal-with-them"]}
`created`	2016-07-29 20:44:39
`last_update`	2016-07-29 20:44:39
`depth`	1
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2016-08-29 10:41:48
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	436
`author_reputation`	895,548,884,934
`root_title`	"Things that STEEMIT should implement to eliminate: multiple accounts, bots, upvoting groups, garbage posts, etc..."
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	474,109
`net_rshares`	0

@msjennifer · Jul 29 '16

Interesting post. Well done :)

👎 stats, antispam, cheetah16

`author`	msjennifer
`permlink`	things-that-steemit-should-implement-to-eliminate-multiple-accounts-bots-upvoting-groups-garbage-posts-etc
`category`	steemit
`json_metadata`	""
`created`	2016-07-29 14:42:21
`last_update`	2016-07-29 14:42:21
`depth`	1
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2016-08-29 10:41:48
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	30
`author_reputation`	-1,468,839,175,006
`root_title`	"Things that STEEMIT should implement to eliminate: multiple accounts, bots, upvoting groups, garbage posts, etc..."
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	465,522
`net_rshares`	-72,267,218
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (3)

voter	rshares	pct
cheetah16	-4,844,521	-20%
antispam	-8,136,951	-10%
stats	-59,285,746	-100%

@viscount0071 · Jul 29 '16

for the first and the second i agree with you. but for the third, i dont think so.

👍 viscount0071

`author`	viscount0071
`permlink`	re-fogspam-things-that-steemit-should-implement-to-eliminate-multiple-accounts-bots-upvoting-groups-garbage-posts-etc-20160729t144505933z
`category`	steemit
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steemit"]}
`created`	2016-07-29 14:44:54
`last_update`	2016-07-29 14:44:54
`depth`	1
`children`	2
`last_payout`	2016-08-29 10:41:48
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	82
`author_reputation`	7,055,887,170
`root_title`	"Things that STEEMIT should implement to eliminate: multiple accounts, bots, upvoting groups, garbage posts, etc..."
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	465,607
`net_rshares`	65,309,371
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
viscount0071	0 B		65,309,371	100%

@fogspam · Jul 29 '16

And what is your idea to stop these endless bad posts ?

👍 tie-warutho

`author`	fogspam
`permlink`	re-viscount0071-re-fogspam-things-that-steemit-should-implement-to-eliminate-multiple-accounts-bots-upvoting-groups-garbage-posts-etc-20160729t151059802z
`category`	steemit
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steemit"]}
`created`	2016-07-29 15:10:57
`last_update`	2016-07-29 15:10:57
`depth`	2
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2016-08-29 10:41:48
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	55
`author_reputation`	2,200,070,551,939
`root_title`	"Things that STEEMIT should implement to eliminate: multiple accounts, bots, upvoting groups, garbage posts, etc..."
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	466,375
`net_rshares`	2,615,489,013
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
tie-warutho	0 B		2,615,489,013	100%

@thecryptofiend · Jul 30 '16

I think a small posting fee would be a good idea like 0.001 SD or alternatively the equivalent SP anyone can afford that.

properties (22)