RE: Regarding Changing the Gridcoin PoS Protocol -- Active Poll by forkpullmerge

View this thread on: hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com

Viewing a response to: @jringo/regarding-changing-the-gridcoin-pos-protocol-active-poll

gridcoin · @forkpullmerge · Sep 12 '17

$0.03

I had not heard of this proposal until now. So thanks for pointing it out. However, after having read most of the thread at github I have decided to vote yes, since I believe that the changes would be an important first step to addressing the challenges that GRC is currently facing. As others have pointed out in the github thread though: I think that you should carry on with the work on your whitepaper and with furthering the ideas around zero PoS reward. The changes that are currently proposed would be a quick fix and do not have to mean that your proposals are off limits for future adoption.

👍 jringo

`author`	forkpullmerge
`permlink`	re-jringo-regarding-changing-the-gridcoin-pos-protocol-active-poll-20170912t182005231z
`category`	gridcoin
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["gridcoin"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-09-12 18:20:06
`last_update`	2017-09-12 18:20:06
`depth`	1
`children`	2
`last_payout`	2017-09-19 18:20:06
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.025 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.007 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	600
`author_reputation`	139,635,533,997
`root_title`	"Regarding Changing the Gridcoin PoS Protocol -- Active Poll"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	14,686,346
`net_rshares`	11,742,893,239
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
jringo	0 B		11,742,893,239	100%

@jringo · Sep 12 '17

Thank you for taking the time to present some feedback = )

I agree that FBR is probably the best path forward right now and I think a detailed proposal would pass with flying colors.  I am very much looking forward to that discussion.  

I also hope that in the future these types of loose proposal polls will be presented as opinion polls while only detailed proposals will be considered actionable.

properties (22)

`author`	jringo
`permlink`	re-forkpullmerge-re-jringo-regarding-changing-the-gridcoin-pos-protocol-active-poll-20170912t200011215z
`category`	gridcoin
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["gridcoin"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2017-09-12 20:00:09
`last_update`	2017-09-12 20:00:09
`depth`	2
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2017-09-19 20:00:09
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	401
`author_reputation`	29,720,071,239,659
`root_title`	"Regarding Changing the Gridcoin PoS Protocol -- Active Poll"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	14,694,134
`net_rshares`	0

@forkpullmerge · Sep 12 '17

I agree that given the state of technologies that are at our disposal, the only truly actionable polls should be regarding hash-secured specific pull-requests (one exception may be with how specific constants in the code have to be; depending on the pending types of changes gambling the market for upcoming changes may have to be prevented). It is that easy. Everything else is simply an option, or an opinion.

properties (22)