Notes while listening, as per normal a lot of it was over my head. 

I do like the idea of de-re-blogging a post. This would allow people to re-blog a post for visibility and then when that visibility is no longer need to un-re-blog it. (about the 0:50 minute mark)

(0:55)
I like the idea of being able to pin post on my own blog, would this option allow just pining my own post or would it allow me to pin other post? If pinning of other post this would be great for adding visibility to post a user would like to highlight on there blog for their followers, and an alternative to re-blogging.

(1:01)
Have pages for all the followers would be good, it does take time to scroll so 50 followers a page would be good.

(1:21)
I appreciate the responses to peoples questions, and I appreciate the response to my question/concerns.

Thank you all for the video, and post,  

Thanks, very neat format!

One other question: there were discussions about allowing proposal creators to lower (but not increase) the daily amount they ask for. I see that the work for that seems to have been completed: https://gitlab.syncad.com/hive/hive/-/issues/39  Was this change a part of the last hardfork? If so, does this mean proposal creators currently have the ability to reduce the amount they are asking for?

Obviously monetary value was created at 0.01. A reasonable threshold. Coder intellectuals are so incompetent sometimes.

Don't tell me you guys went through all that trouble just to do a worse job. Tragic.

as a point to note, there's a bit more to be done to make this overlay look a bit more professional and the videos once uploaded to youtube will be improved a little bit further. I'm basically most focused on ensuring that these become more accessible for everyone who wants them.

I will work on having the live chat from at least vimm.tv and youtube integrated by next time as well, and getting 3speak running properly also.

> Definitely a must needed change, @gandalf and @howo both are thinking of hiring someone (we'll see how that goes)

Make @inertia great again.

I did notice i was able to listen live.

My one addition was that I think I recall @roadscape say he had mostly finished coding for communities that limited posting to members.

My concern is that this setting was only choose-able at community creation and not after the fact. I hope I'm wrong. 

Is there some sort of more in-depth explanation of the issue between having a layer 1 solution and issue? I would like to have some kind of article explaining the challenges.

Would be great if you can add timestamps on the points so it can go to the point on the video timeline.

Who are the ones involved with smt on hive at the moment?

Who are the ones involved with smt on hive at the moment?

Great meeting. Since no one seems to want to pick up the work on layer 1 SMTs at the moment, I was thinking about this possibility: For a long time we were comparing the possibilities of layer 1 SMTs vs a second layer smart contract solution for ALL SMTs, but what if there is a third option?

What if every dev who wants an SMT simply creates his own sidechain. This would allow him to implement all the smart contracts that he needs, and would remove the reliance on hive-engine.

And this would be as decentralized as hive-engine currently is, if not more, as soon as the code is open-sourced. 

This would be made easy by @blocktrades work which will facilitate second layer developments on hive in the next few months.

What do you think of that? I don't know all the technical consequences of that would love a comment from you on that. 

!wine