create account

My appeal to Jeff Berwick: Holding public debates on Steem without the presence of true experts on the subject is risky by innuendo

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com
· @innuendo · (edited)
$22.40
My appeal to Jeff Berwick: Holding public debates on Steem without the presence of true experts on the subject is risky
There is the risk of misconceptions being further perpetuated, instead of being debunked.

https://www.steemimg.com/images/2016/08/19/27SUMOweb1-master768-v2bea82.jpg
[(image credit)](http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/27/sports/japanese-end-drought-in-sumo-wrestling-their-national-sport.html?_r=0)

After one or two weeks, most of us are not able to fully comprehend all the nuances of Steem's inner workings.  It just takes time for these complex concepts to settle down in our heads. In my case it took much longer than a week and even now, after several months, there are still areas that I don't fully understand.

A lot that Tone Vays said during [the latest debate](https://steemit.com/steem/@dollarvigilante/the-great-steemit-debate-tone-vays-vs-jeff-berwick-ponzi-scheme-or-paradigm-shift) was utter non-sense. You did your best to oppose his claims and sometimes you succeed but on a couple of occasions you let him off the hook, while what he was saying made absolutely no sense or was just untrue. And that's OK, after a week of dealing with the subject most of us would not do any better.

Tone Vays should have been knocked out in this debate. He came unprepared (though he declared reading the whitepaper) and has almost no understanding of the blockchain business - yet he survived quite well and got away almost unchallenged. This should not have happened, especially when you receive several thousands dollars for doing this job.

Here is my appeal:
### Please, next time when you organize a similar debate, invite (or partner with) somebody who has a deep understanding of the Steem whitepaper and its codebase.

I'd suggest Nathan Hourt (aka @modprobe). I don't know if he'd agree but I do know he's a very bright guy who [can talk very clearly](https://steemit.com/steem/@modprobe/how-the-steem-dollar-peg-works) and has a deep understanding of Steem (and the entire Graphene codebase).
👍  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and 70 others
properties (23)
authorinnuendo
permlinkmy-appeal-to-jeff-berwick-holding-public-debates-on-steem-without-the-presence-of-true-experts-on-the-subject-is-risky
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"users":["modprobe"],"image":["https://www.steemimg.com/images/2016/08/19/27SUMOweb1-master768-v2bea82.jpg"]}
created2016-08-19 13:38:03
last_update2016-08-19 14:20:15
depth0
children6
last_payout2016-09-19 13:57:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value20.720 HBD
curator_payout_value1.684 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,904
author_reputation31,739,740,997,875
root_title"My appeal to Jeff Berwick: Holding public debates on Steem without the presence of true experts on the subject is risky"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id888,874
net_rshares11,984,441,329,481
author_curate_reward""
vote details (134)
@citizen · (edited)
I actually enjoyed this debate quite a lot. Vays is biased and possibly sometimes uninformed, but the whole exchange still comes across pretty meaningful. A voice of an uniformed sceptic is in my eyes valuable,  leading the conversation in different direction from the one you would ideally like to see, but still a lot of interesting points are getting addressed.
Being in Vays' position, I would certainly spare  anyone my personal opinions on Dan or other people involved in Steemit, which is what happens when he is projecting his impressions of Bitshares onto Steemit, tying them to the authors. Serial entrepreneurship is constant trial and error, and judging someone in that manner is actually a big giveaway of biased judgement. Fortunately Jeff is pretty quick to point it out to him.
properties (22)
authorcitizen
permlinkre-innuendo-my-appeal-to-jeff-berwick-holding-public-debates-on-steem-without-the-presence-of-true-experts-on-the-subject-is-risky-20160819t222941570z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-08-19 22:29:42
last_update2016-08-19 22:34:00
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-09-19 13:57:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length793
author_reputation176,551,047,359
root_title"My appeal to Jeff Berwick: Holding public debates on Steem without the presence of true experts on the subject is risky"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id897,054
net_rshares0
@daut44 · (edited)
I agree with this very much. I joined steemit around the same time as Jeff and every day I seem to find myself engaged in a discussion (never a debate, still in the learning process) with more experienced steemit users where I discover something that I thought I knew was slightly or completely wrong. It's imperative that people engaged in actual debates with vocal detractors have a necessary arsenal to shoot down all of their concerns and doubts, and when that is happening on a public stage it's even more important. +1 to @modprobe, also either  @dantheman or @ned since they seem to be fans of @dollarvigilante, or any of the devs or witnesses who have deeper knowledge of what's going on. Jeff you do a great job but would be nice to see more of a panel type approach with a complete expert to oppose Tone's nonsensical arguments
👍  
properties (23)
authordaut44
permlinkre-innuendo-my-appeal-to-jeff-berwick-holding-public-debates-on-steem-without-the-presence-of-true-experts-on-the-subject-is-risky-20160819t182408765z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"users":["modprobe","dantheman","ned","dollarvigilante"]}
created2016-08-19 18:24:09
last_update2016-08-19 18:26:21
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-09-19 13:57:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length837
author_reputation19,160,071,194,613
root_title"My appeal to Jeff Berwick: Holding public debates on Steem without the presence of true experts on the subject is risky"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id893,432
net_rshares300,340,934
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@gardenlady ·
Agree!
properties (22)
authorgardenlady
permlinkre-innuendo-my-appeal-to-jeff-berwick-holding-public-debates-on-steem-without-the-presence-of-true-experts-on-the-subject-is-risky-20160819t141531391z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-08-19 14:15:06
last_update2016-08-19 14:15:06
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-09-19 13:57:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length6
author_reputation38,110,543,680,290
root_title"My appeal to Jeff Berwick: Holding public debates on Steem without the presence of true experts on the subject is risky"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id889,396
net_rshares0
@kita ·
intense debate, I liked
properties (22)
authorkita
permlinkre-innuendo-my-appeal-to-jeff-berwick-holding-public-debates-on-steem-without-the-presence-of-true-experts-on-the-subject-is-risky-20160819t134547957z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-08-19 13:45:51
last_update2016-08-19 13:45:51
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-09-19 13:57:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length23
author_reputation95,478,052,163
root_title"My appeal to Jeff Berwick: Holding public debates on Steem without the presence of true experts on the subject is risky"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id888,978
net_rshares0
@ntomaino ·
$0.04
Good point. I think Jeff's approach is more relatable to a mainstream user because he's not technical, so I didn't think it was a bad interview. But it would have been fun to see someone technical annihilate Tone.
👍  
properties (23)
authorntomaino
permlinkre-innuendo-my-appeal-to-jeff-berwick-holding-public-debates-on-steem-without-the-presence-of-true-experts-on-the-subject-is-risky-20160819t135544127z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-08-19 13:55:42
last_update2016-08-19 13:55:42
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-09-19 13:57:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.039 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length213
author_reputation19,085,142,785,364
root_title"My appeal to Jeff Berwick: Holding public debates on Steem without the presence of true experts on the subject is risky"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id889,104
net_rshares72,375,451,460
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@ubg · (edited)
We need people like Tone Vays to oppose steemit. The more people there are trying to debunk it the better.

I have to agree on you on your first sentence, people don't usually test claims. They just roll along with them.
👍  
properties (23)
authorubg
permlinkre-innuendo-my-appeal-to-jeff-berwick-holding-public-debates-on-steem-without-the-presence-of-true-experts-on-the-subject-is-risky-20160819t143808295z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2016-08-19 14:38:06
last_update2016-08-19 14:39:00
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-09-19 13:57:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length220
author_reputation5,237,585,248,428
root_title"My appeal to Jeff Berwick: Holding public debates on Steem without the presence of true experts on the subject is risky"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id889,743
net_rshares300,340,934
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)