Viewing a response to: @nateaguila/re-jedielf-szt2ky
Thanks for the reply Nate. I understand your points and I understand this is supposed to be just a new format. But the fact that it's a sectioned off F2P mode with it's own energy means this has the potential to eclipse everything else in Splinterlands if people enjoy it and word spreads. If people play enough, join Discord & guilds many, will end up buying cards and packs, especially if they are good at playing. This could be the cornerstone of some Marketing campaigns. This mode could go viral in a way the paid aspects of the game just can't, and you can promote it squarely to Web2 audiences removing the financial fear or inexperience of crypto blockers. For these reasons I'm viewing it as a new Mode, not a new format. Why specifically can't this mode be the destination for many players? They could be ambassadors for the game and help spread the word. You could even try to encourage that behaviour for F2P players. This game is very complex, for some players that just want to play a few battles once or twice a week this is perfect and they could still contribute in different ways.
author | jedidog |
---|---|
permlink | re-nateaguila-sztlk5 |
category | hive-104500 |
json_metadata | {"tags":["hive-104500"],"app":"peakd/2025.7.3"} |
created | 2025-07-22 21:41:21 |
last_update | 2025-07-22 21:41:21 |
depth | 3 |
children | 1 |
last_payout | 2025-07-29 21:41:21 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 1,099 |
author_reputation | 0 |
root_title | "Which name best represents our new 100% free-to-play format?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 144,313,511 |
net_rshares | 0 |
I think the point I'm trying to make is that if we want a FTP mode where free-to-play is the primary objective (and making that FTP experience as fulfilling as possible)...then great. We should add that mode properly and call it Frontier. But it seems to me that we're hijacking what is supposed to be an onboarding tool and trying to use the name to make it into something else. The end result may end up being a format with identity crisis that doesn't quite fulfill either objective very well.
author | nateaguila |
---|---|
permlink | re-jedidog-sztlts |
category | hive-104500 |
json_metadata | {"tags":["hive-104500"],"app":"peakd/2025.7.3"} |
created | 2025-07-22 21:46:42 |
last_update | 2025-07-22 21:46:42 |
depth | 4 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2025-07-29 21:46:42 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 497 |
author_reputation | 85,131,215,805,179 |
root_title | "Which name best represents our new 100% free-to-play format?" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 144,313,570 |
net_rshares | 0 |