create account

Steem should implement private messages between users by jholdsworthy

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com
· @jholdsworthy · (edited)
$19.04
Steem should implement private messages between users
# No community is complete without a way to contact other people within the community privately.

Currently, there are no in built private messaging system. What this means is that people basically have two ways of messaging other users on this platform.

## a) Directly commenting on a post/story that the other party writes(They might not check)
OR
## b) Using the memo when transferring STEEM or SBD to another user to convey a meaningful message.
Example:
http://i.imgur.com/BDlhys6.png

Now, both of these methods are not PRIVATE AT ALL, nor are they efficient. Think about the potential that we are missing out here. The potential of a more tight knit community, and the potential of business deals being done in private, settled with STEEM or SBD.

#### I suggest that we have a "friending system" within the SteemIt platform. That way, two parties must mutually agree to accept messages from each other before they can actually privately message each other, for obvious reasons of spam mail.

Thank you for reading, and if you like this post, please do upvote. Also do let me know what you think about the subject.
👍  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and 14 others
properties (23)
authorjholdsworthy
permlinksteem-should-implement-private-messages-between-users
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit","steem","money","bitcoin","introduceyourself"],"image":["http://i.imgur.com/BDlhys6.png"]}
created2016-07-17 23:30:24
last_update2016-07-17 23:32:33
depth0
children15
last_payout2016-08-18 00:14:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value15.980 HBD
curator_payout_value3.062 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,122
author_reputation10,526,147,451,360
root_title"Steem should implement private messages between users"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id155,640
net_rshares5,632,693,225,110
author_curate_reward""
vote details (78)
@anon.news ·
I think there are probably a ton of ideas like this on the to-do list. But with the money just coming in and the hack and security being top priority it'll probably take a little while before those are rolled out.
Never know though,  the capital could keep rolling in and we could be seeing everything progress really fast.
👍  
properties (23)
authoranon.news
permlinkre-jholdsworthy-steem-should-implement-private-messages-between-users-20160718t040625621z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"]}
created2016-07-18 04:06:27
last_update2016-07-18 04:06:27
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-08-18 00:14:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length323
author_reputation526,552,286,063
root_title"Steem should implement private messages between users"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id159,407
net_rshares504,901,290
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@edouard ·
Good idea!
👍  
properties (23)
authoredouard
permlinkre-jholdsworthy-steem-should-implement-private-messages-between-users-20160718t070328872z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"]}
created2016-07-18 07:03:27
last_update2016-07-18 07:03:27
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-08-18 00:14:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length10
author_reputation57,191,432,474,224
root_title"Steem should implement private messages between users"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id161,335
net_rshares25,066,963
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@hmfoucault ·
Agreed and your precautions are spot-on!
properties (22)
authorhmfoucault
permlinkre-jholdsworthy-steem-should-implement-private-messages-between-users-20160718t052520211z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"]}
created2016-07-18 05:25:33
last_update2016-07-18 05:25:33
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-08-18 00:14:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length40
author_reputation1,467,956,436,722
root_title"Steem should implement private messages between users"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id160,226
net_rshares0
@jillfeint ·
good idea, if steemit is a social network, it is normal, what, this have private msg
properties (22)
authorjillfeint
permlinkre-jholdsworthy-steem-should-implement-private-messages-between-users-20160718t082928040z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"]}
created2016-07-18 08:29:36
last_update2016-07-18 08:29:36
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-08-18 00:14:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length84
author_reputation4,912,282,609,850
root_title"Steem should implement private messages between users"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id162,285
net_rshares0
@justtryme90 ·
This is a great idea, and is surely coming very very soon.
👍  ,
properties (23)
authorjusttryme90
permlinkre-jholdsworthy-steem-should-implement-private-messages-between-users-20160717t233641719z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"]}
created2016-07-17 23:36:33
last_update2016-07-17 23:36:33
depth1
children1
last_payout2016-08-18 00:14:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length58
author_reputation140,118,479,939,905
root_title"Steem should implement private messages between users"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id155,752
net_rshares13,440,772,008
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@jholdsworthy ·
hopefully :D
properties (22)
authorjholdsworthy
permlinkre-justtryme90-re-jholdsworthy-steem-should-implement-private-messages-between-users-20160717t235041504z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"]}
created2016-07-17 23:50:42
last_update2016-07-17 23:50:42
depth2
children0
last_payout2016-08-18 00:14:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length12
author_reputation10,526,147,451,360
root_title"Steem should implement private messages between users"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id155,965
net_rshares0
@karnal · (edited)
This is what the **MEMO** key is for.

The concept is already present in the underlying technology that powers steemit (it is called [graphene](https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene), conceived and developed by our resident genius [Dan Larimer](https://steemit.com/@dan).

I am not aware of the exact reason of why steemit.com does not implement the functionality right now, it could be as simple as others things have been of more priority to the team.

To illustrate, here is how it looks when I start my [bitshares](https://bitshares.org) wallet (which, as you may recall, was **the first** blockchain powered by **graphene**), with some details blanked out to protect privacy:

ORIGIN_ACCOUNT sent XX.YYYY SOME_TOKEN to DESTINATION_ACCOUNT
**Unlock your wallet in order to see this memo**
X months ago - XX.XXX BTS

The memo does not show up, because the wallet is not locked - only the owner of the memo key belonging to DESTINATION_ACCOUNT can ever read the message.

Same concept in steem!
👍  
properties (23)
authorkarnal
permlinkre-jholdsworthy-steem-should-implement-private-messages-between-users-20160718t083648400z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"],"links":["https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene"]}
created2016-07-18 08:36:48
last_update2016-07-18 08:37:30
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-08-18 00:14:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length998
author_reputation19,869,197,162,216
root_title"Steem should implement private messages between users"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id162,356
net_rshares13,324,320,474
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@muffin2013 ·
Well Steemit should do lots of stuff, but I guess they dont have 500 developers. Let them get the basics done right first, I am sure it will all be brought to steemit what other services already have. Be patient my friend :)
properties (22)
authormuffin2013
permlinkre-jholdsworthy-steem-should-implement-private-messages-between-users-20160718t083224818z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"]}
created2016-07-18 08:32:30
last_update2016-07-18 08:32:30
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-08-18 00:14:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length224
author_reputation39,275,120,261
root_title"Steem should implement private messages between users"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id162,316
net_rshares0
@patrice ·
I really like this idea.  I also like your idea that there needs to be a way to prevent spam.  I would prefer  having a way to block people as opposed to having to be "friends" before sending a message, or have some different options.  I don't mind and would even enjoy unsolicited private comments if they are relevant.
👍  
properties (23)
authorpatrice
permlinkre-jholdsworthy-steem-should-implement-private-messages-between-users-20160718t002445147z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"]}
created2016-07-18 00:24:51
last_update2016-07-18 00:24:51
depth1
children1
last_payout2016-08-18 00:14:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length320
author_reputation26,522,961,289,339
root_title"Steem should implement private messages between users"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id156,445
net_rshares242,378,427
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@jholdsworthy ·
Thanks for the comment patrice. I appreciate every feedback I get.
properties (22)
authorjholdsworthy
permlinkre-patrice-re-jholdsworthy-steem-should-implement-private-messages-between-users-20160718t004314419z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"]}
created2016-07-18 00:43:15
last_update2016-07-18 00:43:15
depth2
children0
last_payout2016-08-18 00:14:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length66
author_reputation10,526,147,451,360
root_title"Steem should implement private messages between users"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id156,675
net_rshares0
@pnc ·
$0.03
This is work in progress
👍  , ,
properties (23)
authorpnc
permlinkre-jholdsworthy-steem-should-implement-private-messages-between-users-20160717t233431214z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"]}
created2016-07-17 23:34:33
last_update2016-07-17 23:34:33
depth1
children2
last_payout2016-08-18 00:14:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.026 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length24
author_reputation31,790,955,405,127
root_title"Steem should implement private messages between users"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id155,719
net_rshares18,058,686,056
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@scrawl ·
$0.02
Yeah the team is working on this, can't remember where I read it.
👍  ,
properties (23)
authorscrawl
permlinkre-pnc-re-jholdsworthy-steem-should-implement-private-messages-between-users-20160717t233538413z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"]}
created2016-07-17 23:35:39
last_update2016-07-17 23:35:39
depth2
children1
last_payout2016-08-18 00:14:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.022 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length65
author_reputation6,127,015,005,793
root_title"Steem should implement private messages between users"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id155,734
net_rshares14,640,157,152
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@aaseb ·
It seems pretty obvious and this is only the beta. Patience...
properties (22)
authoraaseb
permlinkre-scrawl-re-pnc-re-jholdsworthy-steem-should-implement-private-messages-between-users-20160718t001951443z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"]}
created2016-07-18 00:19:51
last_update2016-07-18 00:19:51
depth3
children0
last_payout2016-08-18 00:14:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length62
author_reputation470,722,236,683
root_title"Steem should implement private messages between users"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id156,373
net_rshares0
@solarguy ·
it would be nice.  but the whales and dolphins would be able to better organize and keep the little guys down.
properties (22)
authorsolarguy
permlinkre-jholdsworthy-steem-should-implement-private-messages-between-users-20160802t100025520z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"]}
created2016-08-02 10:02:33
last_update2016-08-02 10:02:33
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-08-18 00:14:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length110
author_reputation63,279,952,248,302
root_title"Steem should implement private messages between users"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id555,869
net_rshares0
@wung ·
Actually there are a lot more important things they want to finish before they start to work out details. 
You're absolutly right, it is a must have - but not for now.

You need a stable base that was build with caution to build something big on it. Otherwhise it won't last long.
👍  ,
properties (23)
authorwung
permlinkre-jholdsworthy-steem-should-implement-private-messages-between-users-20160718t062739792z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"]}
created2016-07-18 06:27:39
last_update2016-07-18 06:27:39
depth1
children0
last_payout2016-08-18 00:14:36
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length280
author_reputation13,913,996,148
root_title"Steem should implement private messages between users"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id160,926
net_rshares228,392,146
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)