# No community is complete without a way to contact other people within the community privately. Currently, there are no in built private messaging system. What this means is that people basically have two ways of messaging other users on this platform. ## a) Directly commenting on a post/story that the other party writes(They might not check) OR ## b) Using the memo when transferring STEEM or SBD to another user to convey a meaningful message. Example: http://i.imgur.com/BDlhys6.png Now, both of these methods are not PRIVATE AT ALL, nor are they efficient. Think about the potential that we are missing out here. The potential of a more tight knit community, and the potential of business deals being done in private, settled with STEEM or SBD. #### I suggest that we have a "friending system" within the SteemIt platform. That way, two parties must mutually agree to accept messages from each other before they can actually privately message each other, for obvious reasons of spam mail. Thank you for reading, and if you like this post, please do upvote. Also do let me know what you think about the subject.
author | jholdsworthy |
---|---|
permlink | steem-should-implement-private-messages-between-users |
category | steemit |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steemit","steem","money","bitcoin","introduceyourself"],"image":["http://i.imgur.com/BDlhys6.png"]} |
created | 2016-07-17 23:30:24 |
last_update | 2016-07-17 23:32:33 |
depth | 0 |
children | 15 |
last_payout | 2016-08-18 00:14:36 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 15.980 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 3.062 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 1,122 |
author_reputation | 10,526,147,451,360 |
root_title | "Steem should implement private messages between users" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 155,640 |
net_rshares | 5,632,693,225,110 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
donkeypong | 0 | 2,516,457,864,678 | 100% | ||
pnc | 0 | 65,454,468,209 | 100% | ||
patrice | 0 | 3,070,257,736 | 100% | ||
nastrom | 0 | 432,044,566 | 100% | ||
max-infeld | 0 | 16,257,637,249 | 100% | ||
dana-edwards | 0 | 410,597,294,976 | 100% | ||
persona-dynamo | 0 | 456,435,295 | 100% | ||
bbqbear | 0 | 102,047,653,726 | 100% | ||
klye | 0 | 1,802,427,491 | 100% | ||
asch | 0 | 29,897,871,392 | 100% | ||
creator | 0 | 2,157,740,176,273 | 100% | ||
rok-fabiani | 0 | 480,404,308 | 100% | ||
justtryme90 | 0 | 14,392,621,737 | 100% | ||
michaelx | 0 | 5,081,592,712 | 100% | ||
business | 0 | 38,947,365,123 | 100% | ||
coinhoarder | 0 | 165,768,037 | 100% | ||
jparty | 0 | 7,529,765,202 | 100% | ||
karnal | 0 | 14,157,090,503 | 100% | ||
v1rtu0so | 0 | 230,091,422 | 100% | ||
frankjones | 0 | 7,837,267,328 | 100% | ||
chetlanin | 0 | 272,609,434 | 100% | ||
michaellamden68 | 0 | 44,220,862 | 100% | ||
jholdsworthy | 0 | 247,535,415 | 100% | ||
orly | 0 | 617,513,492 | 100% | ||
silvano22 | 0 | 105,637,963 | 100% | ||
redpalestino | 0 | 15,297,586,048 | 100% | ||
lukewarm | 0 | 69,009,194 | 100% | ||
wesam | 0 | 36,474,883,362 | 100% | ||
w4lterwyte | 0 | 21,160,386,028 | 100% | ||
yuridan | 0 | 180,484,001 | 100% | ||
aaseb | 0 | 5,865,217,773 | 100% | ||
herbert-boss | 0 | 233,015,104 | 100% | ||
senseiteekay | 0 | 3,418,528,904 | 100% | ||
sephiroth | 0 | 25,270,443,678 | 100% | ||
valen55 | 0 | 15,323,352,908 | 100% | ||
pictorians | 0 | 275,001,056 | 100% | ||
domavila | 0 | 2,284,255,993 | 100% | ||
mianeri | 0 | 25,113,434 | 100% | ||
hmfoucault | 0 | 213,564,054 | 100% | ||
stephencurry | 0 | 5,575,805,675 | 100% | ||
fundurian | 0 | 2,757,811,904 | 100% | ||
luisucv34 | 0 | 144,601,848 | 100% | ||
jillfeint | 0 | 320,078,835 | 100% | ||
q00p | 0 | 6,314,428,909 | 100% | ||
artific | 0 | 487,981,768 | 100% | ||
phenom | 0 | 1,389,376,923 | 100% | ||
willytrader | 0 | 135,823,450 | 100% | ||
yonuts | 0 | 549,501,337 | 100% | ||
madhatting | 0 | 33,242,036 | 100% | ||
stereolubov | 0 | 35,070,626 | 100% | ||
animus | 0 | 61,237,750 | 100% | ||
cryptohustlin | 0 | 117,252,706 | 100% | ||
wynandvanrhyn | 0 | 107,048,772 | 100% | ||
mephdxa21 | 0 | 119,364,616 | 100% | ||
knoopx | 0 | 338,324,439 | 100% | ||
kottai | 0 | 20,789,187 | 100% | ||
wung | 0 | 110,804,884 | 100% | ||
kakoywhich | 0 | 73,859,885 | 100% | ||
nadir | 0 | 115,281,629 | 100% | ||
jchubitnet | 0 | 20,874,399 | 100% | ||
fishborne | 0 | 41,498,352 | 100% | ||
johnsmith | 0 | 90,728,601,424 | 100% | ||
meister | 0 | 862,416,713 | 100% | ||
satellitesister | 0 | 84,682,189 | 100% | ||
mystic-threads | 0 | 114,400,149 | 100% | ||
bakingengineer | 0 | 61,061,114 | 100% | ||
activcat | 0 | 41,129,206 | 100% | ||
crystaljenn | 0 | 95,729,914 | 100% | ||
edouard | 0 | 25,066,963 | 100% | ||
emilhoch | 0 | 232,073,971 | 100% | ||
curator | 0 | 158,295,250 | 100% | ||
anon.news | 0 | 504,901,290 | 100% | ||
chakra74 | 0 | 110,202,953 | 100% | ||
jpb | 0 | 105,646,151 | 100% | ||
pavelwhite | 0 | 31,432,317 | 100% | ||
clevecross | 0 | 112,235,577 | 100% | ||
onamona | 0 | 98,580,777 | 100% | ||
odyssey28 | 0 | 42,252,556 | 100% |
I think there are probably a ton of ideas like this on the to-do list. But with the money just coming in and the hack and security being top priority it'll probably take a little while before those are rolled out. Never know though, the capital could keep rolling in and we could be seeing everything progress really fast.
author | anon.news |
---|---|
permlink | re-jholdsworthy-steem-should-implement-private-messages-between-users-20160718t040625621z |
category | steemit |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steemit"]} |
created | 2016-07-18 04:06:27 |
last_update | 2016-07-18 04:06:27 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-08-18 00:14:36 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 323 |
author_reputation | 526,552,286,063 |
root_title | "Steem should implement private messages between users" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 159,407 |
net_rshares | 504,901,290 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
anon.news | 0 | 504,901,290 | 100% |
Good idea!
author | edouard |
---|---|
permlink | re-jholdsworthy-steem-should-implement-private-messages-between-users-20160718t070328872z |
category | steemit |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steemit"]} |
created | 2016-07-18 07:03:27 |
last_update | 2016-07-18 07:03:27 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-08-18 00:14:36 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 10 |
author_reputation | 57,191,432,474,224 |
root_title | "Steem should implement private messages between users" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 161,335 |
net_rshares | 25,066,963 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
edouard | 0 | 25,066,963 | 100% |
Agreed and your precautions are spot-on!
author | hmfoucault |
---|---|
permlink | re-jholdsworthy-steem-should-implement-private-messages-between-users-20160718t052520211z |
category | steemit |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steemit"]} |
created | 2016-07-18 05:25:33 |
last_update | 2016-07-18 05:25:33 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-08-18 00:14:36 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 40 |
author_reputation | 1,467,956,436,722 |
root_title | "Steem should implement private messages between users" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 160,226 |
net_rshares | 0 |
good idea, if steemit is a social network, it is normal, what, this have private msg
author | jillfeint |
---|---|
permlink | re-jholdsworthy-steem-should-implement-private-messages-between-users-20160718t082928040z |
category | steemit |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steemit"]} |
created | 2016-07-18 08:29:36 |
last_update | 2016-07-18 08:29:36 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-08-18 00:14:36 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 84 |
author_reputation | 4,912,282,609,850 |
root_title | "Steem should implement private messages between users" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 162,285 |
net_rshares | 0 |
This is a great idea, and is surely coming very very soon.
author | justtryme90 |
---|---|
permlink | re-jholdsworthy-steem-should-implement-private-messages-between-users-20160717t233641719z |
category | steemit |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steemit"]} |
created | 2016-07-17 23:36:33 |
last_update | 2016-07-17 23:36:33 |
depth | 1 |
children | 1 |
last_payout | 2016-08-18 00:14:36 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 58 |
author_reputation | 140,118,479,939,905 |
root_title | "Steem should implement private messages between users" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 155,752 |
net_rshares | 13,440,772,008 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
justtryme90 | 0 | 13,193,236,593 | 100% | ||
jholdsworthy | 0 | 247,535,415 | 100% |
hopefully :D
author | jholdsworthy |
---|---|
permlink | re-justtryme90-re-jholdsworthy-steem-should-implement-private-messages-between-users-20160717t235041504z |
category | steemit |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steemit"]} |
created | 2016-07-17 23:50:42 |
last_update | 2016-07-17 23:50:42 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-08-18 00:14:36 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 12 |
author_reputation | 10,526,147,451,360 |
root_title | "Steem should implement private messages between users" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 155,965 |
net_rshares | 0 |
This is what the **MEMO** key is for. The concept is already present in the underlying technology that powers steemit (it is called [graphene](https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene), conceived and developed by our resident genius [Dan Larimer](https://steemit.com/@dan). I am not aware of the exact reason of why steemit.com does not implement the functionality right now, it could be as simple as others things have been of more priority to the team. To illustrate, here is how it looks when I start my [bitshares](https://bitshares.org) wallet (which, as you may recall, was **the first** blockchain powered by **graphene**), with some details blanked out to protect privacy: ORIGIN_ACCOUNT sent XX.YYYY SOME_TOKEN to DESTINATION_ACCOUNT **Unlock your wallet in order to see this memo** X months ago - XX.XXX BTS The memo does not show up, because the wallet is not locked - only the owner of the memo key belonging to DESTINATION_ACCOUNT can ever read the message. Same concept in steem!
author | karnal |
---|---|
permlink | re-jholdsworthy-steem-should-implement-private-messages-between-users-20160718t083648400z |
category | steemit |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steemit"],"links":["https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene"]} |
created | 2016-07-18 08:36:48 |
last_update | 2016-07-18 08:37:30 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-08-18 00:14:36 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 998 |
author_reputation | 19,869,197,162,216 |
root_title | "Steem should implement private messages between users" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 162,356 |
net_rshares | 13,324,320,474 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
karnal | 0 | 13,324,320,474 | 100% |
Well Steemit should do lots of stuff, but I guess they dont have 500 developers. Let them get the basics done right first, I am sure it will all be brought to steemit what other services already have. Be patient my friend :)
author | muffin2013 |
---|---|
permlink | re-jholdsworthy-steem-should-implement-private-messages-between-users-20160718t083224818z |
category | steemit |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steemit"]} |
created | 2016-07-18 08:32:30 |
last_update | 2016-07-18 08:32:30 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-08-18 00:14:36 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 224 |
author_reputation | 39,275,120,261 |
root_title | "Steem should implement private messages between users" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 162,316 |
net_rshares | 0 |
I really like this idea. I also like your idea that there needs to be a way to prevent spam. I would prefer having a way to block people as opposed to having to be "friends" before sending a message, or have some different options. I don't mind and would even enjoy unsolicited private comments if they are relevant.
author | patrice |
---|---|
permlink | re-jholdsworthy-steem-should-implement-private-messages-between-users-20160718t002445147z |
category | steemit |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steemit"]} |
created | 2016-07-18 00:24:51 |
last_update | 2016-07-18 00:24:51 |
depth | 1 |
children | 1 |
last_payout | 2016-08-18 00:14:36 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 320 |
author_reputation | 26,522,961,289,339 |
root_title | "Steem should implement private messages between users" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 156,445 |
net_rshares | 242,378,427 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
jholdsworthy | 0 | 242,378,427 | 100% |
Thanks for the comment patrice. I appreciate every feedback I get.
author | jholdsworthy |
---|---|
permlink | re-patrice-re-jholdsworthy-steem-should-implement-private-messages-between-users-20160718t004314419z |
category | steemit |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steemit"]} |
created | 2016-07-18 00:43:15 |
last_update | 2016-07-18 00:43:15 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-08-18 00:14:36 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 66 |
author_reputation | 10,526,147,451,360 |
root_title | "Steem should implement private messages between users" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 156,675 |
net_rshares | 0 |
This is work in progress
author | pnc |
---|---|
permlink | re-jholdsworthy-steem-should-implement-private-messages-between-users-20160717t233431214z |
category | steemit |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steemit"]} |
created | 2016-07-17 23:34:33 |
last_update | 2016-07-17 23:34:33 |
depth | 1 |
children | 2 |
last_payout | 2016-08-18 00:14:36 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.026 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 24 |
author_reputation | 31,790,955,405,127 |
root_title | "Steem should implement private messages between users" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 155,719 |
net_rshares | 18,058,686,056 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
justtryme90 | 0 | 14,392,621,737 | 100% | ||
jholdsworthy | 0 | 247,535,415 | 100% | ||
senseiteekay | 0 | 3,418,528,904 | 100% |
Yeah the team is working on this, can't remember where I read it.
author | scrawl |
---|---|
permlink | re-pnc-re-jholdsworthy-steem-should-implement-private-messages-between-users-20160717t233538413z |
category | steemit |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steemit"]} |
created | 2016-07-17 23:35:39 |
last_update | 2016-07-17 23:35:39 |
depth | 2 |
children | 1 |
last_payout | 2016-08-18 00:14:36 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.022 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 65 |
author_reputation | 6,127,015,005,793 |
root_title | "Steem should implement private messages between users" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 155,734 |
net_rshares | 14,640,157,152 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
justtryme90 | 0 | 14,392,621,737 | 100% | ||
jholdsworthy | 0 | 247,535,415 | 100% |
It seems pretty obvious and this is only the beta. Patience...
author | aaseb |
---|---|
permlink | re-scrawl-re-pnc-re-jholdsworthy-steem-should-implement-private-messages-between-users-20160718t001951443z |
category | steemit |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steemit"]} |
created | 2016-07-18 00:19:51 |
last_update | 2016-07-18 00:19:51 |
depth | 3 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-08-18 00:14:36 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 62 |
author_reputation | 470,722,236,683 |
root_title | "Steem should implement private messages between users" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 156,373 |
net_rshares | 0 |
it would be nice. but the whales and dolphins would be able to better organize and keep the little guys down.
author | solarguy |
---|---|
permlink | re-jholdsworthy-steem-should-implement-private-messages-between-users-20160802t100025520z |
category | steemit |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steemit"]} |
created | 2016-08-02 10:02:33 |
last_update | 2016-08-02 10:02:33 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-08-18 00:14:36 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 110 |
author_reputation | 63,279,952,248,302 |
root_title | "Steem should implement private messages between users" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 555,869 |
net_rshares | 0 |
Actually there are a lot more important things they want to finish before they start to work out details. You're absolutly right, it is a must have - but not for now. You need a stable base that was build with caution to build something big on it. Otherwhise it won't last long.
author | wung |
---|---|
permlink | re-jholdsworthy-steem-should-implement-private-messages-between-users-20160718t062739792z |
category | steemit |
json_metadata | {"tags":["steemit"]} |
created | 2016-07-18 06:27:39 |
last_update | 2016-07-18 06:27:39 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-08-18 00:14:36 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 280 |
author_reputation | 13,913,996,148 |
root_title | "Steem should implement private messages between users" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 160,926 |
net_rshares | 228,392,146 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
wung | 0 | 110,804,884 | 100% | ||
nadir | 0 | 117,587,262 | 100% |