create account

RE: Why whales are needed - and a proposal to insure the massive success of steemit, ie Subtractive Upvoting Gradient by jl777

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @complexring/re-jl777-re-complexring-re-jl777-why-whales-are-needed-and-a-proposal-to-insure-the-massive-success-of-steemit-20160723t150118578z

· @jl777 ·
$2.56
I still dont understand how using a subtractive effective SP makes it rate limiting...
It only reduces the power for upvoting someone with a lot of SP, even if the subtractive factor is sqrt(SP author) it biases upvoting to the smaller SP authors.
There can be a million sybil accounts, but what does that gain? The whales have to vote for them and if a whale is voting for newbie accounts that he controls, this will be noticed wouldnt it? especially if the content is weak. So then he needs to hire writers to create useful content, in which case it creates useful content
Maybe I wasnt clear that this was just to reduce upvote power and not to increase it, so whatever attack you say it has, the existing system can be attacked the same way with more power
👍  , , , ,
properties (23)
authorjl777
permlinkre-complexring-re-jl777-re-complexring-re-jl777-why-whales-are-needed-and-a-proposal-to-insure-the-massive-success-of-steemit-20160723t173216840z
categoryupvoting
json_metadata{"tags":["upvoting"]}
created2016-07-23 17:32:18
last_update2016-07-23 17:32:18
depth4
children0
last_payout2016-08-25 12:00:39
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value2.216 HBD
curator_payout_value0.341 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length760
author_reputation14,988,697,980,664
root_title"Why whales are needed - and a proposal to insure the massive success of steemit, ie Subtractive Upvoting Gradient"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id301,336
net_rshares1,630,518,111,599
author_curate_reward""
vote details (5)