create account

We need to change the number of witness votes from 30 down to 5 by jondoe

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com
· @jondoe ·
$1.22
We need to change the number of witness votes from 30 down to 5
# Right now on steem/steemit we have 30 witness votes.

That is a major problem when only the top 20 witnesses are the major decision makers.

That means that one group or stakeholder could elect all 20 witnesses.

Which is exactly what is going on right now.

We have the two largest stake holders deciding who the top 20 witnesses are.

This is anything but decentralized.

Help me get this changed as soon as possible. 

Let it be known that you want this changed as soon as possible to keep the chain as decentralized and distributed as possible.
👍  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
properties (23)
authorjondoe
permlinkwe-need-to-change-the-number-of-witness-votes-from-30-down-to-5
categorysteem
json_metadata{"community":"busy","app":"busy/2.5.6","format":"markdown","tags":["steem","steemit","busy","palnet","steemleo"],"users":[],"links":[],"image":[]}
created2019-07-26 20:27:27
last_update2019-07-26 20:27:27
depth0
children10
last_payout2019-08-02 20:27:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.983 HBD
curator_payout_value0.237 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length550
author_reputation484,533,716,905,550
root_title"We need to change the number of witness votes from 30 down to 5"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd0
post_id88,782,819
net_rshares3,749,970,736,895
author_curate_reward""
vote details (19)
@crokkon · (edited)
.
.
👍  
properties (23)
authorcrokkon
permlinkpvb2l7
categorysteem
json_metadata"{"app": ""}"
created2019-07-27 14:50:54
last_update2022-09-18 09:03:21
depth1
children1
last_payout2019-08-03 14:50:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1
author_reputation81,214,366,861,104
root_title"We need to change the number of witness votes from 30 down to 5"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id88,812,243
net_rshares4,065,938,040
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@jondoe · (edited)
$0.56
I have not, but just looking at how many vests they control, all it basically takes is freedom/pumpkin and blocktrades and you are a top witness no matter what. There is only one witness in the top 20 not getting a freedom/pumpkin vote.

So, in effect, he is dictating the direction of the entire platform.

It can't be that way.

I was told we need to rally up support from the community to make this change.

Getting the witnesses interested in it may be another topic all together, after all it will affect some of them continuing to be within the top 20...
👍  , , ,
properties (23)
authorjondoe
permlinkpvb9px
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2019-07-27 17:25:09
last_update2019-07-27 17:26:27
depth2
children0
last_payout2019-08-03 17:25:09
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.420 HBD
curator_payout_value0.138 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length560
author_reputation484,533,716,905,550
root_title"We need to change the number of witness votes from 30 down to 5"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd0
post_id88,818,250
net_rshares1,597,598,440,585
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)
@dr-frankenstein · (edited)
<div class="text-justify">

The number needs to be revisited for sure.

We also need to reset the votes each year or X period of time. People can die, become uninterested, or just decide to leave ... it's a real problem that no one is talking about.

</div>
👍  
properties (23)
authordr-frankenstein
permlinkpv9nwx
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2019-07-26 20:36:30
last_update2019-07-26 20:43:27
depth1
children1
last_payout2019-08-02 20:36:30
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length257
author_reputation36,699,868,158,028
root_title"We need to change the number of witness votes from 30 down to 5"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id88,783,059
net_rshares3,983,419,123
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@jondoe ·
$0.62
Yep. The witness structure needs a major overhaul and it is one of the most important aspects of the ecosystem, no wonder we are failing.
👍  , , ,
properties (23)
authorjondoe
permlinkpv9o29
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2019-07-26 20:39:45
last_update2019-07-26 20:39:45
depth2
children0
last_payout2019-08-02 20:39:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.467 HBD
curator_payout_value0.153 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length137
author_reputation484,533,716,905,550
root_title"We need to change the number of witness votes from 30 down to 5"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd0
post_id88,783,146
net_rshares1,780,884,547,564
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)
@hungryharish ·
That's an awesome thoughts and pulled a hardwork to deliver with statistics. I believe yes , decreasing the witness votes will be great idea. I agree with that decrease the large stake influence But it's also effects the low ranked witnesses who are running the block chain with minimum profit or returns. The decreasing of witness votes will discourage or leave them hopeless.

But there is another great way to counter this problem.

## Expiry of witness vote

Yes, after every period of time, the votes of a member should be expire and again he need to vote. So the witnesses are in constant check and attentive about the votes. If the top 20 witness is inactive on chain, people don't vote for him again. So there will be regular events by witnesess  showing their work to block chain members and urging and reminding about  the importance of the witness vote to people.

Posted using [Partiko Android](https://partiko.app/referral/hungryharish)
👍  
properties (23)
authorhungryharish
permlinkhungryharish-re-jondoe-we-need-to-change-the-number-of-witness-votes-from-30-down-to-5-20190728t204623451z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"app":"partiko","client":"android"}
created2019-07-28 20:46:24
last_update2019-07-28 20:46:24
depth1
children3
last_payout2019-08-04 20:46:24
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length949
author_reputation43,084,570,998,742
root_title"We need to change the number of witness votes from 30 down to 5"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id88,864,933
net_rshares3,266,922,930
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@jondoe ·
$0.70
Yes I like that as well. Though I think a long period of time is needed. Something like a year sounds reasonable to me, where votes expire after 12 months.
👍  , , ,
properties (23)
authorjondoe
permlinkpvesn8
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2019-07-29 15:06:45
last_update2019-07-29 15:06:45
depth2
children2
last_payout2019-08-05 15:06:45
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.529 HBD
curator_payout_value0.173 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length155
author_reputation484,533,716,905,550
root_title"We need to change the number of witness votes from 30 down to 5"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd0
post_id88,894,756
net_rshares2,054,311,271,356
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)
@hungryharish ·
Yes, that's very sustainable model.

Posted using [Partiko Android](https://partiko.app/referral/hungryharish)
properties (22)
authorhungryharish
permlinkhungryharish-re-jondoe-pvesn8-20190729t150859981z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"app":"partiko","client":"android"}
created2019-07-29 15:09:00
last_update2019-07-29 15:09:00
depth3
children1
last_payout2019-08-05 15:09:00
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length110
author_reputation43,084,570,998,742
root_title"We need to change the number of witness votes from 30 down to 5"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id88,894,858
net_rshares0
@onyechi ·
I always thought that number was too much, way too much, it should be reduced 
properties (22)
authoronyechi
permlinkre-jondoe-2019726t215759567z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem","steemit","busy","palnet","steemleo"],"app":"esteem/2.0.0-mobile","format":"markdown+html","community":"esteem.app"}
created2019-07-26 20:58:06
last_update2019-07-26 20:58:06
depth1
children1
last_payout2019-08-02 20:58:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length78
author_reputation68,674,596,745,239
root_title"We need to change the number of witness votes from 30 down to 5"
beneficiaries
0.
accountesteemapp
weight1,000
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id88,783,675
net_rshares0
@jondoe ·
$0.61
5 is a good number because it would prevent just splitting up of stake to still control all 20 votes. It could still be done, but a very large stake would be needed.
👍  , , ,
properties (23)
authorjondoe
permlinkpv9q0d
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2019-07-26 21:21:48
last_update2019-07-26 21:21:48
depth2
children0
last_payout2019-08-02 21:21:48
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.458 HBD
curator_payout_value0.151 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length165
author_reputation484,533,716,905,550
root_title"We need to change the number of witness votes from 30 down to 5"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd0
post_id88,784,461
net_rshares1,745,552,132,631
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)