Could we use the steemit model to improve Wikipedia? by jzeal

View this thread on: hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com

technology · @jzeal · May 13 '16

$4.78

Could we use the steemit model to improve Wikipedia?

I had a thought worth sharing - that we could use the Steemit model to contribute, improve and support models and resources such as Wikipedia.
What do you think?

👍 pharesim, xeroc, liondani, benjojo, markopaasila, bob-the-poster, niasweetz, jzeal, officialbitcash, bobsunday, lsr, spaninv, teamsteem, plushzilla

`author`	jzeal
`permlink`	could-we-use-the-steemit-model-to-improve-wikipedia
`category`	technology
`json_metadata`	{}
`created`	2016-05-13 13:53:48
`last_update`	2016-05-13 13:53:48
`depth`	0
`children`	3
`last_payout`	2016-08-16 05:01:39
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	2.390 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	2.389 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	161
`author_reputation`	736,203,371,711
`root_title`	"Could we use the steemit model to improve Wikipedia?"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	5,717
`net_rshares`	5,989,928,164,535
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (14)

voter	rshares	pct
pharesim	4,270,330,443,182	100%
liondani	474,767,500,528	100%
xeroc	782,125,910,000	100%
benjojo	447,992,381,055	100%
markopaasila	10,867,553,434	100%
bobsunday	463,576,832	100%
bob-the-poster	548,014,384	100%
niasweetz	533,788,012	100%
jzeal	518,634,523	100%
officialbitcash	507,642,109	100%
spaninv	454,327,911	100%
teamsteem	363,485,415	100%
lsr	454,907,150	100%
plushzilla	0	100%

@ned · May 22 '16

Yep. .. there may also be potential for an incentivized Github.

properties (22)

`author`	ned
`permlink`	re-jzeal-could-we-use-the-steemit-model-to-improve-wikipedia-20160522t002002210z
`category`	technology
`json_metadata`	{}
`created`	2016-05-22 00:20:00
`last_update`	2016-05-22 00:20:00
`depth`	1
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2016-08-16 05:01:39
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	63
`author_reputation`	94,449,026,656,258
`root_title`	"Could we use the steemit model to improve Wikipedia?"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	10,636
`net_rshares`	0

@pei13 · May 19 '16

That would be a great idea.

properties (22)

`author`	pei13
`permlink`	re-jzeal-could-we-use-the-steemit-model-to-improve-wikipedia-20160519t225221032z
`category`	technology
`json_metadata`	{}
`created`	2016-05-19 22:52:21
`last_update`	2016-05-19 22:52:21
`depth`	1
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2016-08-16 05:01:39
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	27
`author_reputation`	93,964,201,105
`root_title`	"Could we use the steemit model to improve Wikipedia?"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	9,412
`net_rshares`	0

@pharesim · May 13 '16

$228.14

Dan already mentioned plans for a wiki category where everyone will be able to edit a post. I really hope this will be implemented soon.

👍 dan, pharesim, steempower, pei13, teamsteem, jholdsworthy, cryptomondo

`author`	pharesim
`permlink`	re-jzeal-could-we-use-the-steemit-model-to-improve-wikipedia-20160513t135724634z
`category`	technology
`json_metadata`	{}
`created`	2016-05-13 13:57:21
`last_update`	2016-05-13 13:57:21
`depth`	1
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2016-08-16 05:01:39
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	114.069 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	114.069 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	136
`author_reputation`	239,450,405,799,183
`root_title`	"Could we use the steemit model to improve Wikipedia?"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	5,720
`net_rshares`	51,479,031,650,615
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (7)

voter	rshares	pct
dan	46,820,000,000,000	100%
pharesim	4,601,712,629,132	100%
steempower	56,275,654,014	100%
pei13	453,908,321	100%
teamsteem	363,485,415	100%
jholdsworthy	225,973,733	100%
cryptomondo	0	100%