create account

Should Resteems be Rewarded? by kafkanarchy84

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com
· @kafkanarchy84 · (edited)
$10.74
Should Resteems be Rewarded?
https://s27.postimg.org/5y0uqtbw3/IMG_6732.jpg

# I tend to be of the opinion that the "Resteem" is a valuable tool for the platform which serves an extremely important purpose, but that this feature need not be incentivized in terms of the "Resteemer" being rewarded for his or her service to the original blogger. 

# Here's why:

**The Resteem is great. It allows for lesser-known authors who are pumping out great content to get noticed. It allows for old, buried content to be revitalized and reintroduced to new viewers.** ***It allows for valuable relationships to be forged, networking to be facilitated, and for Steemit as a platform, as a whole, to be more self-integrated and self-sustaining.***

# Why I don't think Resteems need to be rewarded.

The Resteem is kind of a reward in and of itself. If someone resteems my content, I stand a chance to garner more votes, and thus a larger monetary compensation for my content. If someone resteems my post, I know immediately they value my content, or something I said, intimated, or proposed therein, more than "the average bear." 

***When someone Resteems your stuff, you know you've connected. Many times this means you also have a new follower.*** The beauty of Steem is that those authors you dig, like you, are continually amassing Steem Power. This means that as you increase in clout blogging, collecting SP, and honing your craft, *so do they.* AND SO DO THEIR VOTES.
The potential for synergistic relationships and exponential growth on Steemit is often overlooked and at worst, not even brought to the average Steemian's awareness. 

# Investment in Steem is more than just putting your money or content in. It is building relationships with people of like goals, mindsets, and passions, to the end of creating a synergy that will benefit both yourself and the entire Steem community, in the end...which...in the real end, BENEFITS YOU!!! 

Thus, introducing rewards for Resteeming a post is a redundancy, in my opinion. Market incentives for resteeming already exist, and in a big way. 

# What do you think? Should Resteems have separate rewards of their own? Let me know in the comments.

# ~KafkA

[<center>![IMG_6356.jpg](https://s29.postimg.org/4tdrtkp53/IMG_6356.jpg)</center>](https://steemit.com/@kafkanarchy84)

***

***Graham Smith is a Voluntaryist activist, creator, and peaceful parent residing in Niigata City, Japan. Graham runs the "Voluntary Japan" online initiative with a presence here on Steem, as well as Facebook and Twitter. (Hit me up so I can stop talking about myself in the third person.)***

https://s24.postimg.org/uww4iszxx/Steemit_sub_header.png

https://s23.postimg.org/ca8ifyuej/image.jpg
👍  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and 124 others
properties (23)
authorkafkanarchy84
permlinkshould-resteems-be-rewarded
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem","steemit","resteem","cryptocurrency"],"image":["https://s27.postimg.org/5y0uqtbw3/IMG_6732.jpg","https://s29.postimg.org/4tdrtkp53/IMG_6356.jpg","https://s24.postimg.org/uww4iszxx/Steemit_sub_header.png","https://s23.postimg.org/ca8ifyuej/image.jpg"],"links":["https://steemit.com/@kafkanarchy84"],"app":"steemit/0.1","format":"markdown"}
created2017-01-10 15:40:54
last_update2017-01-10 15:56:39
depth0
children25
last_payout2017-02-10 16:25:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value9.290 HBD
curator_payout_value1.453 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length2,692
author_reputation349,526,315,896,646
root_title"Should Resteems be Rewarded?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,212,523
net_rshares39,198,426,631,232
author_curate_reward""
vote details (188)
@anotherjoe ·
Here come the resteeming bots, right?
I like the feature as-is, for all the reasons you gave. Paying folks to resteem would create some nightmares of resteeming for profit. Of course, we could unfollow those folks, so maybe it would work.
Upon reflection, I guess the market would decide how it was used if they did. But I like the goodwill aspect of it.
👍  ,
properties (23)
authoranotherjoe
permlinkre-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170110t161437210z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2017-01-10 16:14:36
last_update2017-01-10 16:14:36
depth1
children1
last_payout2017-02-10 16:25:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length354
author_reputation40,326,779,382,210
root_title"Should Resteems be Rewarded?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,212,877
net_rshares76,851,206,615
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@kafkanarchy84 ·
>I guess the market would decide how it was used if they did.

Right. If it was incentivized, I really wouldn't mind, necessarily. I trust free markets. I just think it is kind of nice, as is.
👍  
properties (23)
authorkafkanarchy84
permlinkre-anotherjoe-re-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170110t164235812z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2017-01-10 16:42:30
last_update2017-01-10 16:42:30
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-02-10 16:25:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length192
author_reputation349,526,315,896,646
root_title"Should Resteems be Rewarded?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,213,123
net_rshares7,313,328,002
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@artem-sokoloff ·
I agree. I've resteemed.
👍  
properties (23)
authorartem-sokoloff
permlinkre-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170110t194719685z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2017-01-10 19:47:15
last_update2017-01-10 19:47:15
depth1
children1
last_payout2017-02-10 16:25:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length24
author_reputation63,785,479,701,078
root_title"Should Resteems be Rewarded?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,214,736
net_rshares78,244,246,715
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@kafkanarchy84 ·
Cheers. Thanks very much.
properties (22)
authorkafkanarchy84
permlinkre-artem-sokoloff-re-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170111t014202771z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2017-01-11 01:42:03
last_update2017-01-11 01:42:03
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-02-10 16:25:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length25
author_reputation349,526,315,896,646
root_title"Should Resteems be Rewarded?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,217,053
net_rshares0
@darkflame ·
If I upvote a post first and then resteem it, the additional attention it gets will only benefit me more.
properties (22)
authordarkflame
permlinkre-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170110t202138092z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2017-01-10 20:21:39
last_update2017-01-10 20:21:39
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-02-10 16:25:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length105
author_reputation91,920,890,361,411
root_title"Should Resteems be Rewarded?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,214,974
net_rshares0
@dylanzachary ·
yes i am with you...
Resteam should be incentivized..
@kafkanarchy84 followed
properties (22)
authordylanzachary
permlinkre-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170110t154340462z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"],"users":["kafkanarchy84"]}
created2017-01-10 15:43:42
last_update2017-01-10 15:43:42
depth1
children1
last_payout2017-02-10 16:25:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length77
author_reputation-124,825,347,477
root_title"Should Resteems be Rewarded?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,212,556
net_rshares0
@kafkanarchy84 ·
I did not argue for the incentivization of Resteems.
properties (22)
authorkafkanarchy84
permlinkre-dylanzachary-re-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170110t154804708z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2017-01-10 15:48:00
last_update2017-01-10 15:48:00
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-02-10 16:25:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length52
author_reputation349,526,315,896,646
root_title"Should Resteems be Rewarded?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,212,592
net_rshares0
@giantbear ·
The resteem is enough reward as is.  No reward system should be given to a resteem.  I have also thought of the resteem going to one central place like trending but then I am sure people will not check the resteem menu.  I like things the way they are now.  Just getting used to everything.  What irritates me most is that people do not answer when someone makes a comment.  Further I am very happy with steemit just the way it is.  :)
👍  
properties (23)
authorgiantbear
permlinkre-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170110t155658236z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2017-01-10 15:57:03
last_update2017-01-10 15:57:03
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-02-10 16:25:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length435
author_reputation419,012,927,701,052
root_title"Should Resteems be Rewarded?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,212,670
net_rshares74,534,429,158
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@hilarski ·
Resteem rewards would be great but would need to be limited. If they counted towards your total posts per day I would be cool with it. Maybe no more rewards after 2 or 4 and rewards should only be based on post resteem rewards. For example a post might have $5 but then I resteem and it earns $20. I would only be eligible for rewards on $15. 

I do like how it works currently but the idea has value.
properties (22)
authorhilarski
permlinkre-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170110t175554928z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2017-01-10 17:55:54
last_update2017-01-10 17:55:54
depth1
children1
last_payout2017-02-10 16:25:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length401
author_reputation488,873,580,141,533
root_title"Should Resteems be Rewarded?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,213,800
net_rshares0
@canadian-coconut ·
I like your idea of the max # of 2 or 4 resteems being rewarded.  Plus your reward should only be based on people who click and vote via your resteem link.
Right now I dislike how some people resteem 10-20 times a day, as it builds up my feed too quickly.  For example, I have wanted to follow someone who supports my blog and posts good articles about once a week, however I could not because all of his resteems were filling up my feed, and they weren't the type of topics that I was really interested in.
properties (22)
authorcanadian-coconut
permlinkre-hilarski-re-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170110t181430477z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2017-01-10 18:14:33
last_update2017-01-10 18:14:33
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-02-10 16:25:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length507
author_reputation96,294,848,609,233
root_title"Should Resteems be Rewarded?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,213,931
net_rshares0
@ianstrat ·
I agree with you. If I resteem it is because I believe the post deserves it and not for monetary gain
👍  
properties (23)
authorianstrat
permlinkre-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170110t155112873z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2017-01-10 15:51:18
last_update2017-01-10 15:51:18
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-02-10 16:25:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length101
author_reputation12,786,084,463,699
root_title"Should Resteems be Rewarded?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,212,624
net_rshares74,534,429,158
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@jacobtothe ·
I fear a resteem reward will lead to even worse results than upvote reward bots. Resteeming bots would clutter the system severely.
properties (22)
authorjacobtothe
permlinkre-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170111t024127841z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2017-01-11 02:41:30
last_update2017-01-11 02:41:30
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-02-10 16:25:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length131
author_reputation568,152,335,871,549
root_title"Should Resteems be Rewarded?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,217,415
net_rshares0
@michaelstobiersk · (edited)
You bring forth an excellent point worth discussion.  I think they could be rewarded. More importantly, I would like to see resteems in a separate file from the main blog. ☆☆☆☆☆😎
👍  ,
properties (23)
authormichaelstobiersk
permlinkre-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170110t154611712z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2017-01-10 15:46:12
last_update2017-01-10 15:46:36
depth1
children4
last_payout2017-02-10 16:25:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length178
author_reputation28,639,834,562,096
root_title"Should Resteems be Rewarded?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,212,581
net_rshares76,939,237,789
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@kafkanarchy84 ·
A separate category for resteems is a great idea.
properties (22)
authorkafkanarchy84
permlinkre-michaelstobiersk-re-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170110t154850054z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2017-01-10 15:48:45
last_update2017-01-10 15:48:45
depth2
children3
last_payout2017-02-10 16:25:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length49
author_reputation349,526,315,896,646
root_title"Should Resteems be Rewarded?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,212,598
net_rshares0
@maxse ·
Any idea if this is coming? I saw a post some time ago that it'd be implemented. But it's still not here :'(
Resteems should be rewarded, they're a big part of curation.

But what I'd really really love to see, is upvoting and commenting on 'old' posts.

There's so many great old posts that are just forgotten or never even looked at, while they still are worth attention.  A lot of times I find awesome posts that haven't earned anything while a lot of efford is put in. I've got the idea that if someone posts little every day, it has a lot more potential on this platform because old posts could never get 'trending' again.
properties (22)
authormaxse
permlinkre-kafkanarchy84-re-michaelstobiersk-re-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170110t160732491z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2017-01-10 16:07:39
last_update2017-01-10 16:07:39
depth3
children1
last_payout2017-02-10 16:25:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length627
author_reputation9,504,532,692,213
root_title"Should Resteems be Rewarded?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,212,802
net_rshares0
@michaelstobiersk ·
I followed you.
properties (22)
authormichaelstobiersk
permlinkre-kafkanarchy84-re-michaelstobiersk-re-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170110t170324285z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2017-01-10 17:03:24
last_update2017-01-10 17:03:24
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-02-10 16:25:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length15
author_reputation28,639,834,562,096
root_title"Should Resteems be Rewarded?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,213,319
net_rshares0
@schattenjaeger ·
It would probably lead to a lot of annoying spam.
👍  ,
properties (23)
authorschattenjaeger
permlinkre-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170110t161141836z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2017-01-10 16:11:54
last_update2017-01-10 16:11:54
depth1
children1
last_payout2017-02-10 16:25:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length49
author_reputation132,607,893,972,093
root_title"Should Resteems be Rewarded?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,212,845
net_rshares75,334,847,373
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@michaelstobiersk ·
Good point.
properties (22)
authormichaelstobiersk
permlinkre-schattenjaeger-re-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170110t170106883z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2017-01-10 17:01:09
last_update2017-01-10 17:01:09
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-02-10 16:25:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length11
author_reputation28,639,834,562,096
root_title"Should Resteems be Rewarded?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,213,293
net_rshares0
@seablue ·
I don't think resteeming should be rewarded, because then it becomes tainted by the monetary value of resteeming.  People will resteem because it advantages them monetarily regardless of whether they like the post or not.  Resteeming is about showing support and affinity with a particular post or author.  IMHO, it should stay that way.
👍  
properties (23)
authorseablue
permlinkre-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170110t185216013z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2017-01-10 18:52:12
last_update2017-01-10 18:52:12
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-02-10 16:25:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length337
author_reputation18,862,018,948,644
root_title"Should Resteems be Rewarded?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,214,310
net_rshares182,833,604
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@winstonwolfe ·
I honestly don't care if I get rewarded for resteeming. What I DO want, however, is the ability to add a comment to my resteem, such as "This is awesome, you should check this out" or something like that.
👍  , ,
properties (23)
authorwinstonwolfe
permlinkre-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170110t162302735z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2017-01-10 16:23:09
last_update2017-01-10 16:23:09
depth1
children4
last_payout2017-02-10 16:25:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length204
author_reputation161,894,117,584,940
root_title"Should Resteems be Rewarded?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,212,966
net_rshares100,318,762,786
author_curate_reward""
vote details (3)
@canadian-coconut ·
Great idea!
properties (22)
authorcanadian-coconut
permlinkre-winstonwolfe-re-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170110t180930349z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2017-01-10 18:09:33
last_update2017-01-10 18:09:33
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-02-10 16:25:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length11
author_reputation96,294,848,609,233
root_title"Should Resteems be Rewarded?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,213,898
net_rshares0
@imerick ·
I like this idea a lot.
properties (22)
authorimerick
permlinkre-winstonwolfe-re-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170111t052144308z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2017-01-11 05:21:42
last_update2017-01-11 05:21:42
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-02-10 16:25:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length23
author_reputation1,635,611,053,148
root_title"Should Resteems be Rewarded?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,218,156
net_rshares0
@michaelstobiersk ·
Good point! I agree 100%.
👍  
properties (23)
authormichaelstobiersk
permlinkre-winstonwolfe-re-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170110t170152829z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2017-01-10 17:01:54
last_update2017-01-10 17:01:54
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-02-10 16:25:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length25
author_reputation28,639,834,562,096
root_title"Should Resteems be Rewarded?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,213,303
net_rshares5,698,451,983
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@seablue ·
I would like to comment on Resteems too.
👍  
properties (23)
authorseablue
permlinkre-winstonwolfe-re-kafkanarchy84-should-resteems-be-rewarded-20170110t185404342z
categorysteem
json_metadata{"tags":["steem"]}
created2017-01-10 18:54:00
last_update2017-01-10 18:54:00
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-02-10 16:25:15
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length40
author_reputation18,862,018,948,644
root_title"Should Resteems be Rewarded?"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,214,330
net_rshares182,833,604
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)