Oh my god . This is very scary

Pls be alert @knircky

thanks for the heads up dear friend

I don't have much money so it is not a big risk for me :) anyway, I think it should be fixed.

Thank you for the info. Such mistakes are often costly. I'll sure watch out.

Good the mistake didn't reoccur. But you got to be smarter and careful next time. Here we talking about tranfering financial asset. Not everyone is an angel enough to send it back to you.

Is not really about the phone is about you being more careful. Thanks for the enlightenment @knircky

I only do transfers on my MacBook. 
Somehow I don’t feel comfortable with such things on the smartphone

I'm amazed by how many people do things on their phone these days.

Personally,  I found the screen too small to see very well on.

I have a pretty big phone but I still don't trust my ability to look at the screen and see what's really there.

I'd much rather be looking at a computer screen so that I can make sure I don't accidentally make a mistake.

We might want to elucidate one point in the above article. PoWHCoin did not "bring forth" EthPyramid. It is the aftereffect of a bona fide endeavor at repairing the defects in the agreement. We go for add up to straightforwardness in all that we do, including a few notices that what you're getting engaged with is decisively what it says on the mark. Those of us who have dealt with the agreement are not associated with those behind PoWHCoin in any capacity, shape, or frame. We have discharged measurements, investigations, the GitHub store for our front-end, and straightforwardly connect to the shrewd contract. There is no endeavor to trap anybody. We are additionally not identified with PoWH420 or some other variation on the idea, either right now in presence or being developed. 

We have been willing for two weeks now to talk about with media outlets our own particular expectations in keeping the stage running as genuine gatekeepers of a "protected, straightforward fraudulent business model". While the major idea of a fraudulent business model is to be sure zero-entirety, we would ask that you talk with us before making slapdash associations.

I also experienced it before. Luckily you found it out. I feel it’s super difficult to add a memo via the phone. What I did is keep scrolling until the flash in the right textbox, then type. Kinda tiring indeed.

If you make that mistake on my account I **promise** I will return **some** of it :p

This is very scary man.. we should be careful while transferring fund..We need a good app for mobile use..I also faced some problem on mobile so that i left using steemit on mobile ...i always use on laptop..It will be good if steem inc develop a good mobile app.

I hope that you can correct this mistake..

Absence of tolerance 

I need to concede that this one can be a toughie, particularly on the off chance that you stay aware of crypto Twitter by any means. We are immersed with "OMG HUGE PUMP BUY" or "Welp, looks like BTC is destroyed, better offer." 

While this data may have some legitimacy, it is physically difficult to stay aware of everything, and, as a rule, the patient are the most compensated. For example, I increased 46,000% development by simply holding my Decred for a long time. Had I sold when it was worth $0.20, I would have lost around $18,000. 

This doesn't really mean no additions can be produced using here and now exchanging. An incredible inverse is valid. Yet, in the event that you do choose to exchange here and now, have an arrangement, and stick persistently to that arrangement. 

To cite my golden calf Warren Buffett, "the stock exchange is a gadget for exchanging cash from the restless to the patient." Crypto is like money markets in this regard.

More than $300m of cryptocurrency has been lost after a series of bugs in a popular digital wallet service led one curious developer to accidentally take control of and then lock up the funds, according to reports.

Unlike most cryptocurrency hacks, however, the money wasn’t deliberately taken: it was effectively destroyed by accident. The lost money was in the form of Ether, the tradable currency that fuels the Ethereum distributed app platform, and was kept in digital multi-signature wallets built by a developer called Parity. These wallets require more than one user to enter their key before funds can be transferred.

Ledger wallets generate the displayed receive address using JavaScript code running on the host machine,” the report reads. “This means that a malware can simply replace the code responsible for generating the receive address with its own address, causing all future deposits to be sent to the attacker.

Whao... That would have been so heart-breaking if you did. Thankfully you were able to rectify we. We all should be careful before sending things.

Thats a really shit thing to happen. Thanks for the heads up

All Ledger wallets have an imperfection that gives programmers a chance to take your digital currency

Cryptographic money fans who depend on Ledger equipment wallets to protect their coins should practice outrageous alert when sending reserves: sticky-fingered programmers may be out to re-course your computerized cheddar far from your expected beneficiary and straight to their own particular wallets.

The organization has taken to Twitter to remind clients to "dependably check [their] receiv[ing] address" on their gadgets' screen physically by utilizing the "screen" catch at the base of every exchange ask for frame.

Alluding to a current helplessness report from DocDroid, Ledger recognized that its equipment wallets experiences an imperfection that makes it workable for assailants to contaminate it with malware, intended to deceive you into sending your cryptographic money to the programmers.

Congratulations @knircky! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

[![](https://steemitimages.com/70x80/http://steemitboard.com/notifications/posts.png)](http://steemitboard.com/@knircky) Award for the number of posts published

Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.

To support your work, I also upvoted your post!
For more information about SteemitBoard, click [here](https://steemit.com/@steemitboard)

If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word `STOP`

> Upvote this notification to help all Steemit users. Learn why [here](https://steemit.com/steemitboard/@steemitboard/http-i-cubeupload-com-7ciqeo-png)!

Well you were lucky

Luckily, You survived...Uh, that is quite a temptation...

There are rumors that Bit grail became insolvent following a withdrawal bug that was discovered by some users and then shared in Discord and other chat groups, causing the wallet balance to gradually diminish. One user explained: “There was a bug on Bit grail where if you placed two orders you got double balance added to your account. You could then withdraw while the orders were up and steal the coins. You had negative balance in the end but you could just make a new account.

That's one of the reasons why I just use the posting key on my iPhone ;)

This should help once it is done: https://github.com/steemit/condenser/issues/2599

This only happened with iPhone or as well at the Pc for some people?

In the result of the occurrence, this hypothesis has been supported by affirmations that a bug was to be sure dependable, and not in nano's code, but rather in Bitgrail's. One source stated: "There was a bug, on the pull back page. Be that as it may, this check was just on java-content customer side, you discover the js which is sending the demand, at that point you investigate component – support, and run the java-content physically, to send a demand for withdrawal of a higher sum than in your adjust. Bitgrail conveyed this withdrawal. What number of individuals did this? Who knows." 

There was another bug, you could ask for a withdrawal to your address – from another client id, from another client account. That would cause alternate clients adjust to have "missing assets" or "negative adjust". Bit grail plane tackled this bug by physically entering the "right" numbers in his database. This is the thing that you get for utilizing a PHP site coded by same aptitude level as CfB of IDIOTA.

I'm curious. Why not use eSteem? Have you heard of it?

Thank goodness, it didn't happen again