create account

RE: Witness/Proposal Vote Expiration - Post HF24 Discussion by kodaxx

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com

Viewing a response to: @timcliff/re-jackmiller-qgdf0p

· @kodaxx ·
$0.11
I agree with this. I think expiring votes is a good idea, and 6 months+ does make it more palatable.

However, the 2 other proposed solutions are also interesting 🤔

1). This is a good idea in case witnesses go inactive
2). And this solution is good for stakeholders that go inactive.

I think maybe these things, combined with a longer overall expiry period could make for an interesting idea.

If solution 1 and 2 are both implemented, and then an overall re-vote in, say, 3 years or 5 even...it could help voters decide to look into their votes consciously again after a long period, yet keep their voting generally maintenance free during that period, aside from potentially serious problems.
👍  
properties (23)
authorkodaxx
permlinkre-timcliff-qgm5a3
categoryhive-139531
json_metadata{"tags":["hive-139531"],"app":"peakd/2020.09.4"}
created2020-09-13 20:08:27
last_update2020-09-13 20:08:27
depth3
children0
last_payout2020-09-20 20:08:27
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.054 HBD
curator_payout_value0.055 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length696
author_reputation3,759,197,365,919
root_title"Witness/Proposal Vote Expiration - Post HF24 Discussion"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id99,609,623
net_rshares614,595,154,082
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)