I Made Another Bot by kryzsec

View this thread on: hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com

bot · @kryzsec · Feb 22 '18

$29.55

I Made Another Bot

<center><img src="https://steemitimages.com/DQmNTm6vymaNNKji45Yjez4C4Zq9BQRwm24Xxp7daFmTmvm/Screenshot-2018-2-22%20%20stem-warning.png"></center>

This is simple and easy. I made this bot so that if I see a post that has copyrighted photos or improper attribution it will leave the comment.

I will no longer comment with my account as I feel if all the comments are on a single account (this one) it will be slightly more streamlined to find posts that were commented on to see if they fixed the problem. It is a part of the steemstem guidelines that you reference your photos and to not break copyright laws (or do our best not to)

The comment left is:

<blockquote>
One or more of your photos is breaking some form of copyright, whether it be that the photos require proper attribution or are licensed in such a way that they are not free to use. For more information, check out this post <a href="https://steemit.com/steemstem/@steemstem/guidelines-on-copyright-standards-in-steemstem">here</a> on steemstem copyright standards.<br><br>Sincerely,<br>@kryzsec
</blockquote>

And it links to the copyright guidelines post by steemstem. This bot informs you that you have copyrighted works, nothing else. Because all curation is manual through steemstem it will not upvote "incase a mistake was made" like with cheetah. This is being done in an attempt for sake of transparency and because I know a lot of people want feedback.

👍 lafona-miner, steemstem, abigail-dantes, justtryme90, bue, qurator, kerriknox, techslut, fredrikaa, mobbs, lemouth, anarchyhasnogods, fminerten, steempty, kryzsec, trumpman, zest, dcj, dber, aboutcoolscience, sco, gra, makerhacks, molecular-wizard, gentleshaid, re-engineer, alexs1320, kenadis, nitesh9, lamouthe, mystifact, amavi, carloserp-2000, the-devil, steemstem-bot, leczy, foundation, himal, csusbgeochem1, hadji, rachelsmantra, juanjdiaz89, blessing97, rjbauer85, robotics101, oleg326756, shawkr13, aurimarjimenez, juliethromero, amico, rockeynayak, theleapingkoala, scrooger, energyaddict22, sci-guy, lartist-zen, superdavey, entrepreneur916, mineopoly, prudent-rod1, vaitelavicius, itsben, squared

`author`	kryzsec
`permlink`	i-made-another-bot
`category`	bot
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["bot","steemstem"],"users":["kryzsec"],"image":["https://steemitimages.com/DQmNTm6vymaNNKji45Yjez4C4Zq9BQRwm24Xxp7daFmTmvm/Screenshot-2018-2-22%20%20stem-warning.png"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steemstem/@steemstem/guidelines-on-copyright-standards-in-steemstem"],"app":"steemit/0.1","format":"markdown"}
`created`	2018-02-22 22:39:06
`last_update`	2018-02-22 22:39:06
`depth`	0
`children`	6
`last_payout`	2018-03-01 22:39:06
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	23.366 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	6.179 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	1,429
`author_reputation`	7,407,841,935,851
`root_title`	"I Made Another Bot"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	39,712,207
`net_rshares`	5,308,666,091,277
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (63)

voter	rshares	pct
fminerten	58,339,808,767	2%
steempty	55,047,690,276	2%
lafona-miner	1,198,656,635,449	25%
bue	376,146,472,365	100%
justtryme90	527,457,866,498	20%
lemouth	76,548,556,276	20%
rjbauer85	1,491,860,472	50%
anarchyhasnogods	73,995,642,724	25%
lamouthe	10,758,727,808	50%
techslut	141,088,539,759	10%
steemstem	1,131,271,747,028	50%
oleg326756	756,846,882	1.47%
foundation	4,126,769,563	50%
the-devil	6,999,442,741	50%
scrooger	256,273,545	1.94%
mobbs	79,752,130,566	42.5%
kryzsec	39,779,182,009	100%
fredrikaa	85,977,444,087	25%
trumpman	37,618,607,518	31%
dber	21,809,043,856	50%
kerriknox	172,703,413,027	50%
blessing97	1,601,614,885	50%
rockeynayak	282,892,287	50%
mystifact	7,699,988,733	50%
juanjdiaz89	1,758,828,567	50%
nitesh9	10,966,016,357	50%
himal	2,910,388,383	50%
abigail-dantes	730,757,279,052	50%
leczy	4,285,854,459	50%
csusbgeochem1	2,799,953,024	100%
re-engineer	14,337,565,957	100%
zest	34,390,720,751	100%
theleapingkoala	260,547,617	1.47%
shawkr13	686,649,133	4.72%
superdavey	104,384,172	0.11%
makerhacks	16,266,058,984	47%
qurator	207,680,123,408	5.9%
carloserp-2000	7,005,267,770	50%
rachelsmantra	1,866,664,016	50%
gra	16,690,609,605	50%
sci-guy	118,120,089	50%
prudent-rod1	59,997,858	2.95%
aboutcoolscience	21,218,125,119	30%
kenadis	12,023,109,006	50%
amavi	7,523,734,652	10%
robotics101	1,146,453,987	42.5%
alexs1320	13,069,920,772	50%
gentleshaid	14,521,776,312	50%
mineopoly	72,232,083	0.05%
sco	20,422,386,067	50.88%
squared	0	100%
molecular-wizard	15,478,251,922	100%
itsben	51,426,922	2.95%
hadji	1,891,268,828	50%
steemstem-bot	4,754,079,821	35%
entrepreneur916	89,290,204	1.47%
energyaddict22	183,650,272	1.47%
dcj	31,527,524,722	100%
vaitelavicius	52,556,084	10%
juliethromero	534,832,296	100%
aurimarjimenez	548,335,198	100%
amico	337,616,844	22%
lartist-zen	107,293,843	100%

@alexs1320 · Feb 22 '18 (edited)

$0.07

First of all, thanks for bot :)

I have 2 questions:
1. If the Figure from the paper or the photo from the microscope is my, original work, and it's published (*in more or less that form) does it count as the violation? Because it's "original", "parent" photo, but it could be interpreted as the "modification of the published"
1. In case of a paper like this, licenced as Open Access and with the clear statement that it can be used, can we do screenshots?
 ![](https://steemitimages.com/DQmfL8AC3bBK15gwW2Dm7VzTV6qha2ue236RpueX1jNE7vB/image.png)

I know from the [recent case](https://www.dpreview.com/news/1925670628/judge-rules-that-embedding-a-photo-tweet-is-copyright-infringement) that the screenshot of copyright protected material **is illegal**

👍 kryzsec

`author`	alexs1320
`permlink`	re-kryzsec-i-made-another-bot-20180222t225434316z
`category`	bot
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["bot"],"image":["https://steemitimages.com/DQmfL8AC3bBK15gwW2Dm7VzTV6qha2ue236RpueX1jNE7vB/image.png"],"links":["https://www.dpreview.com/news/1925670628/judge-rules-that-embedding-a-photo-tweet-is-copyright-infringement"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2018-02-22 22:54:36
`last_update`	2018-02-22 22:55:36
`depth`	1
`children`	4
`last_payout`	2018-03-01 22:54:36
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.066 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.003 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	754
`author_reputation`	150,945,165,388,638
`root_title`	"I Made Another Bot"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	39,714,659
`net_rshares`	12,923,186,033
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
kryzsec	0 B		12,923,186,033	33%

@kryzsec · Feb 22 '18

I have a feeling where I doubt you will get comments form this bot, anyways lets jump into this.

>If the Figure from the paper or the photo from the microscope is my, original work, and it's published (*in more or less that form) does it count as the violation? Because it's "original", "parent" photo, but it could be interpreted as the "modification of the published"

If you are taking a picture of something that is <i>your work</i> then I believe that you hold the copyright to it, even if you are following the directions of someone else. So if you hold the copyright then you would have to state somewhere that you are the copyright holder.
>In case of the paper like this, licenced as Open Access and with the clear statement that it can be used, can we do screenshots?

If a study is open source then I believe that you may quote or use screenshots from the paper in question though in many (to all) cases a proper attribution is required, which is more than just a link sending you to the original source.

I hope that makes sense

properties (22)

`author`	kryzsec
`permlink`	re-alexs1320-re-kryzsec-i-made-another-bot-20180222t230349848z
`category`	bot
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["bot"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2018-02-22 23:03:51
`last_update`	2018-02-22 23:03:51
`depth`	2
`children`	3
`last_payout`	2018-03-01 23:03:51
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	1,041
`author_reputation`	7,407,841,935,851
`root_title`	"I Made Another Bot"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	39,716,024
`net_rshares`	0

@alexs1320 · Feb 22 '18 (edited)

I'm mostly concerned with the Q1, because once I get something published - it's locked even from myself. There are some papers I wrote, but I only have "Proof Version", and I have never seen the final version. In other words, it looks like I gave them all the rights.

Concerning the *Open Access*, **warning for the authors**, although it an *Open access*, there are still several sub-types:
* "do whatever you want"
* "only non-commercial" 
* "ok but don't change it"
* "ok, but it must stay under the same license"

And the combinations of all 4 previously mentioned cases

So, those symbols are ok: ![](https://steemitimages.com/DQmRgvZf1EJtkhACyPn954TYWV3Rcj2N3ihZPRBaxvHW6hA/image.png)  ![](https://steemitimages.com/DQmbpwkLnUKacNoU5t9AZJCvn6FHifvTN4VQ56Ycw4d7qCe/image.png)

and I suppose this one, but it's little grey (SA - share-alike): ![](https://steemitimages.com/DQmfXEqveya9KtTKykRAuUXejeBCYy5ugXafiGo2LCPhks3/image.png)

This is very grey as SteemIt is sort of commercial: ![](https://steemitimages.com/DQmWg564Li62aeuMd3gsHpmEiZQUgi4ZaHNjHSc6ehX6az4/image.png)

I have no idea if it's ND (is direct screenshot a derivative or "original")

So, what's the final agreement after the post by @mobbs ?

properties (22)

`author`	alexs1320
`permlink`	re-kryzsec-re-alexs1320-re-kryzsec-i-made-another-bot-20180222t232416609z
`category`	bot
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["bot"],"users":["mobbs"],"image":["https://steemitimages.com/DQmRgvZf1EJtkhACyPn954TYWV3Rcj2N3ihZPRBaxvHW6hA/image.png","https://steemitimages.com/DQmbpwkLnUKacNoU5t9AZJCvn6FHifvTN4VQ56Ycw4d7qCe/image.png","https://steemitimages.com/DQmfXEqveya9KtTKykRAuUXejeBCYy5ugXafiGo2LCPhks3/image.png","https://steemitimages.com/DQmWg564Li62aeuMd3gsHpmEiZQUgi4ZaHNjHSc6ehX6az4/image.png"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2018-02-22 23:24:21
`last_update`	2018-02-22 23:25:00
`depth`	3
`children`	2
`last_payout`	2018-03-01 23:24:21
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	1,214
`author_reputation`	150,945,165,388,638
`root_title`	"I Made Another Bot"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	39,719,299
`net_rshares`	0

2 replies

@lartist-zen · Feb 23 '18

good job !

properties (22)