In this part, it starts to get juicy. This was just after I stumbled on the idea of the *electron fog*, the idea that there is a mass of unattached electrons surrounding matter, whose function and effect is to push matter back together against the expansion of space, as well as the medium that conveys magnetic fields, and in nonmagnetic matter, forms a discordant radial anisotropy, which is what causes gravity.

There is no diagrams in this one, perhaps I should make one but I don't really have the materials presently to do so. I did find a picture on stackexchange physics showing the electrostatic attraction of water.

# 2016-04-19.15:18

I am definitely getting the allergic bronchoconstriction. It affects me a bit like emphysema, I have to move more slowly and my mental energies also slow and I am in a constant half alert state.

It is a lucky thing I do make some money begging. I can get food this way. I have to cut out beer as well... it hasn't developed to the severe yet so, I should be ok. Keeping the schedule to get the best possible yields is going to be mandatory. I might just park in the good location and only move when the toroidof my body needs something in or out the donut hole.

<center>***</center>

**It has been a peculiar realisation in my mental experiments figuring out that electrons swim around matter in a great cloud, all the time.** 

The surface tension model implied it but when I considered the static but fluid paths of magnetic fields and how they manipulate space between two blocks of ferromagnetic substances, these flux paths are not atomic orbitals. *They transmit kinetic energy and induce pulses of current through electrical conductors.*

When you talk about the, for example, gravitational potential energy of an object raised up, being released when dropped, if that object is a magnet, and you drop it through a nonferrous but electroconductive tube, the rate of release of the kinetic energy is slower than normal, due to so called eddy currents. But the gravitational potential energy still comes from this cloud of disorderly average neutral electrins. When it is raised the object accumulates this cloud around it, when it is dropped it merges more with the ground until impact. 

*[Try this sometime with an aluminium or copper pipe and a magnet sometime... The magnetic field conveys a current, and thus magnetic field, into the metal pipe, and this field pushes back on the magnet as it falls.]*

Well, I am speaking perhaps a little vaguely. But the idea of the electron cloud surface centering on the body of mass, and the distortion towards nearby other objects, is literally energy being taken inwards and away from the common center when raising, and when lowering, the fuzzy thread gets thicker until the energy is largely now around the earth and only the top side of our object is holding a surface.

We see in computer graphic drop simulations and the original base model was a gaussian blur followed by a sharp threshold and voila, you see the liquid surfaces touch, join and merge, and if you do this with photoshop or so, set the transparency of your two circles to 50% and when their centers coincide, assuming you adjust the threshold curve correctly after the appropriate gaussian blur, voila, the new circle is the combined area of the originals. 

Same would apply if the threshold is left out and you consider the density alone. And it would also show as they converge that at a certain point there is a sharp rise in the density at the mutual center, and when modelled this is a point at which the surface is intensely stretched at the merging point and bounces, in a springlike manner. This is acceleration, of course.

*[I have not expressed this in the most concise manner. What I mean is, as the two clouds approach each other, if you adjust the gaussian blur so that it increases with proximity, and the threshold maintains the original volume, there is an acceleration of the merging of the two areas, which causes the oscillating deformation after the surfaces combine.]*

In the early days of the development of inkjet printing, and maybe Canon still builds them, there was the bubblejet. This works by a literal bubble, with capacitance, charged to become electrostatic, and then a small pulse of electricity of the same polarity pings the little drop out. On the microscale, electrostatic charge behaves exactly like magnetism. It is not, very much, affected by magnetism. It is tiny surface poles where magnetism is alternating layers, the shapes have little relation and thus do not interact.

http://i.stack.imgur.com/EbW0h.jpg

**But they *do* interact when the magnetic field is strong enough.** Electrostatic interactions affect the motion of fluids. Just get an acrylic rod, rub it with clean animal fibre materials, and move it next to a laminar stream from a tap. Magick! The water is attracted to the acrylic. It does this almost not at all without noticable electrostatic charge, and the fur you used repels the water, aka hydrophobic.

<center>***</center>

There I was thinking I would not write any more about physics and when I return to my "dwelling place", I can't help myself. My lungs have opened up too.

*[The dwelling place at the time was an electrical distribution room that ran the lights in the tunnel under NDK park, by the way.]*

<center>***</center>

Indeed this little old phone senses where I touch it by detecting the change of density of electrostatic charges. Capacitors work by building electrostatic charge and when sufficient builds up there is a tiny arc and the electrons jump across to the conductor on the other side.

**It is the same cloud of neutral electrons, once again, in each case.**

I was leading towards further examples too, with the thing about water being attracted to electrostatically charged acrylic plastic. The phenomenon of dissolution of nonpolar solids to nonpolar liquids, and the counterpart of polar to polar, is electrostatics as well. It was first discovered in orbital space stations that without gravity one can grow flawless crystals. 

Recently it was discovered that very strong magnetic fields disrupt the normal gravitic density fractionation. When a crystal grows, the liquid it was bonded to is released and consequently it is of a different density, and if you shine a strong light through the liquid onto a flat white surface, you can see a column rising from it that resembles a smoke plume. It also is visible if you look closely you will notice this plume refracts the light like a lens. *[The movement of the low density water that remains after crystal deposition upwards ceases in a strong magnetic field.]*

This is entirely consistent with this model. The interactions are weak because of geometry. Electrostatics are surface, and thus largely spheroid, bubbles, basically, and magnetic fields are linear, toridal, and fibrous, with a fundamental checkerboard pattern in cross section. Or maybe it is the triangles, another matrix geometry that can be coloured alternately with only two colours. *[negative and positive]*

Now, going a little further, electrostatics and gravity in my model of all bodies of mass attracting and holding a fuzzy cloud of neutral, disordered electrons, has the same geometry as electrostatics. The difference is poles, and their pattern. The gravity-acting electron clouds are repelled by both magnetic and electrostatic, regardless of which polarity you look at.

While working on ion drives, basically electrostatic impellers of noble gases to produce newtonian style equal and opposite force, it was discovered *[recently]* that the electrostatic charge has a repulsive effect on what they consider to be space, in this case a vacuum chamber in a laboratory. 

**I consider this to be the beginning of discovering a method to move bodies through space without a net energy cost.**

The energy is all around, all the time. Moving things requires simply to shift space from the front, and out the back. This sounds simplistic, but if space is filled with varying densities of this electron fog, denser around matter, then right away you can see that we are not far off being free to leave the electron fog around earth, and go anywhere we want.

There is a small caveat that propulsion systems that do this will not work so well in the space between stars where this fog is at its thinnest, but this is not in fact a problem. This is where the expansion of space model comes into play. The electron fog is repelled by space itself. This is why it clings to matter. *[Note that at this point in my thinking I did not consider that the speed of motion of electrons explains the way the  geometry of matter retains a relatively stable ratio of space to particles, reversing the tendency from space expansion.]*

Thus to propel in space one simply needs to shift the bulk of the cloud to the rear side in the direction of travel, and voila. The repulsion against space is thus stronger and focused at the back and at the front weaker and repels less. The net effect will be acceleration.

**And so, I return to the scavenger coil.** 

The scavenger coil is toroidal. Via the selection of an appropriate set of capacitance in the node bridges, using harmonics, what we want to do to make a gravity drive is a harmonic phase at the back, and a disharmonic phase at the front. The pulses released by the charge/discharge if the capacitors, once the device has accumulated maximum energy in the magnetic fields and as electrostatic charge in the capacitors, it will fall into a stable rhythm. But we want maximum dissonance possible between the pulse release patterns, we want to produce noise, basically. 

As the magnetic fields interact if they are random, and of sufficient momentary impulse, we will cause disorderly regions in the magnetic field. This is essentially like shifting the electron fog. Because of the twist pattern in the geometry of the coil, we can then, I am hypothesising, "pump" the disordered electron fog from the front to the back.

Now this is a different function than the scavenging function. My intuition is that the scavenging will work by the use of harmonic resonance to capture maximal energy from the structured EMF waves, but the electron fog pump rrquires a different behaviour, the opposite, really, we want the pump to generate highly disordered pulses in the magnetic field to shift the electron fog to one side, and essentially shift the centre of mass of the whole body of matter, which includes the fog.

Shifting the center of mass is how all propulsion systems work. Acceleration is caused by the misalignment of the mass and the fog. The fog is thinned at the front, and thicker at the back... the fog is what stops the mass from moving. When it is thin it stops it less. This is why you cannot have this without the expanding spacetime at the same time. The fog is like a lens, keeping the centre aligned with its centre. It follows the mass.

<center>***</center>

**Ok, I gotta take a break here. The correct distortion of the fog is critical to understanding how it can be directly manipulated.**

<center>***</center>

Ah. It is the toroid. Sucking inwards at the front towards the centre of mass, and spraying outwards at the back. Still the same as what I was saying, but just clarifying the geometry. Like peristalsis, the pulses will pull in from the front and through the center and out the back.

*Is it just me or does this kinda sound a bit. Um. Like digestion? Heh.*

**This brings me back to the scavenger function.** 

Whatever the pump function is, the scavenger is the opposite. The scavenger should be taking that dense region where the fog of the coil and the fog of the earth is in that state of tension, and turn it into a moving magnetic field structure there is immense energy there, it is just in the wrong shape.

<center>***</center>

*I have realised that this creative process is rebalancing my health. I think now I literally cannot stop doing this writing without being overcome by this sickness. The correlation became visible to me in this session. I have many more ideas springing from this line of investigation, such as inducing the restructuring of matter with a specific waveform of electromagnetic flux made of tiny structured alternating regions.* 

<center>***</center>

It should be possible, for example, to disrupt water's fluidic cohesion and make it gas at room temperature, or solid. Just a simple example. Likewise turn for example nitrogen and water into ammonium hydroxide.

I will continue again soon, I clearly must

## Update Notes

After reading this through again, my mind again alights upon the mechanics of the hypothetical electron fog, and this text in particular reminds me about how electrostatic forces operate like tiny little magnetic fields. 

The example from the picture brings to mind precisely the insight that water has a positive charge on its surface because of the hydrogen bonds that also make it a "Polar" liquid, this is because of the oxygen having its electrons pulled towards the hydrogens in its bonds leaving its balanced inner electron shell (which is like Helium), and the hydrogen, with its single electron pulled towards the oxygen, which attracts the proton of the hydrogen, and forms the super strong intermolecular bond which makes it the most capacious molecule for storing infrared photons known.

Conversely, the pictured cup is polystyrene, which is covered in only naked hydrogen atomic nuclei. The balanced oxygen shell has a negative polarisation, and the naked hydrogen nucleus has a positive polarisation. Thus, the cup has a positive charge, and the water negative. The hydrogen protons attract water, but they repulse it at contact, because the hydrogens in the water molecules repel it at close range, but the much larger oxygen atom with its 3 pairs of electrons, two taken by the hydrogen, and 2 remaining, thus has a net negative polarisation in the range of the oxygen's much larger two layer shell (first layer is exposed by the bonding). 

Thus, with the foregoing note in mind, I am suggesting that the microstructure of the electron fog around these tiny structures likely has thin filamenty magnetic polar circuits as well. Attraction is caused by filaments forming the 'bubbles' between opposite magnetic poles, and conversely, repulsion by like poles coming into contact. When the filaments are between 90 and 270 degrees out of phase, they are repulsive, when they are from 270 to 90, they are attractive.

In other words, the atoms have toroidal orbiting 'electron fog' particles extending beyond their atomic radial boundaries, and these electrons mediate the micro-scale forces of electrostatics, in exactly the same way as magnetic poles. If you are following me up  to this point, what I am saying is that the differences between the various fundamental forces is geometry and scale, they operate on a simple primary geometry, however. 

This links gravity, strong, weak and electromagnetic force into a single mechanism. In other words, I am saying this is a Unified Field Theory.

But when the water gets next to the styrene proper, the hydrogen protons repel each other, halving the net charge at this close range. Thus the styrene is hydrophobic, though at a greater distance it attracts the water.

<hr />

http://s20.postimg.org/igf27v79p/signature_new_small.png
*We can't stop here! This is Whale country!*

Loki was born in Australia, now lives in Sofia, Bulgaria. IT generalist, physics theorist, futurist and cyber-agorist. Loki's life mission is to establish a secure, distributed layer atop the internet, and enable space migration.

*I'm a thoughtocaster, a conundrummer in a band called Life Puzzler. I've flipped more lids than a monkey in a soup kitchen, of the **mind**.* - Xavier, Renegade Angel

    *
> *All images in the above post are either original from me, or taken from Google Image Search, filtered for the right of reuse and modification, and either hotlinked directly, or altered by me*