Separate voting power for post and responses. by liondani

View this thread on: hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com

steemit-ideas · @liondani · May 14 '16 (edited)

$0.80

Separate voting power for post and responses.

![](https://lbwong.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/speech20logo.jpg) 
I want to up-vote a couple of responses because I really believe they are worth it, but in much cases I don't, because I want more voting power for the Original posts and not "spent" it to responses... Would it make sense to have 2 separate voting powers? One for the initial posts and one only for the comments/responses? I think it would give greater motivation to participate on conversations, and that will ultimately give life to steemit (except the dollars of course)

👍 enable, liondani, benjojo, donkeypong, pfunk, val, mf-tzo

`author`	liondani
`permlink`	separate-voting-power-for-post-and-responses
`category`	steemit-ideas
`json_metadata`	{}
`created`	2016-05-14 11:25:24
`last_update`	2016-05-14 11:30:39
`depth`	0
`children`	4
`last_payout`	2016-08-03 00:00:06
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.400 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.399 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	539
`author_reputation`	95,095,146,236,111
`root_title`	"Separate voting power for post and responses."
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	6,163
`net_rshares`	1,746,290,616,534
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (7)

voter	rshares	pct
enable	587,832,772,800	100%
liondani	507,087,197,300	100%
val	37,143,018,470	100%
benjojo	499,191,510,318	100%
pfunk	40,380,086,341	100%
donkeypong	74,106,395,378	100%
mf-tzo	549,635,927	100%

@dantheman · May 14 '16

The op benefits from all discussion rewards.  So an up vote to a response pays both.

👍 bob-the-poster

`author`	dantheman
`permlink`	re-liondani-separate-voting-power-for-post-and-responses-20160514t125653826z
`category`	steemit-ideas
`json_metadata`	{}
`created`	2016-05-14 12:56:54
`last_update`	2016-05-14 12:56:54
`depth`	1
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2016-08-03 00:00:06
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	84
`author_reputation`	240,292,002,602,347
`root_title`	"Separate voting power for post and responses."
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	6,215
`net_rshares`	559,198,351
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
bob-the-poster	0 B		559,198,351	100%

@liondani · May 14 '16 (edited)

$0.21

I haven't made it clear enough... I mean other post in general not only the OP post... I don't want to spent all my voting power due an interesting conversation on a specific post... I want when leaving an interesting conversation to have still voting power to vote for other post as well... It would make sense to me to have full voting power for each separate post **conversation**...

👍 liondani

`author`	liondani
`permlink`	re-dantheman-re-liondani-separate-voting-power-for-post-and-responses-20160514t125653826z-20160514t132619785z
`category`	steemit-ideas
`json_metadata`	{}
`created`	2016-05-14 13:26:18
`last_update`	2016-05-14 16:32:18
`depth`	2
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2016-08-03 00:00:06
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.102 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.103 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	386
`author_reputation`	95,095,146,236,111
`root_title`	"Separate voting power for post and responses."
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	6,220
`net_rshares`	569,220,289,287
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
liondani	0 B		569,220,289,287	100%

@liondani · May 25 '16

If someone wants to achieve max. rewards in the current system it makes not sense to upvote responses. It make only sense to upvote posts !!! (that is the reason of my above suggestion)
And that alone discourage  to keep good conversations live....That is my conclusion/opinion... If someone disagree with me please let me know and explain me why I am wrong...

properties (22)

`author`	liondani
`permlink`	re-liondani-separate-voting-power-for-post-and-responses-20160525t223937149z
`category`	steemit-ideas
`json_metadata`	{}
`created`	2016-05-25 22:39:36
`last_update`	2016-05-25 22:39:36
`depth`	1
`children`	1
`last_payout`	2016-08-03 00:00:06
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	360
`author_reputation`	95,095,146,236,111
`root_title`	"Separate voting power for post and responses."
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	14,247
`net_rshares`	0

@bbqbear · May 27 '16

I agree, that is the way I understood it too. It looks great for daily post sorting, but counterproductive for sorting good responses\conversations.  It completely removes the incentive to upvote comments you agree with but that do not seem popular, forcing more of  the "I agree" type posts like this. Unless you know for sure the %4 investors club will like and upvote that comment too, it's not a good investment.

properties (22)

`author`	bbqbear
`permlink`	re-liondani-re-liondani-separate-voting-power-for-post-and-responses-20160527t165446766z
`category`	steemit-ideas
`json_metadata`	{}
`created`	2016-05-27 16:55:03
`last_update`	2016-05-27 16:55:03
`depth`	2
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2016-08-03 00:00:06
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	416
`author_reputation`	17,818,351,858,368
`root_title`	"Separate voting power for post and responses."
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	15,999
`net_rshares`	0