RE: The Politics of Negative Voting by logic

View this thread on: hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com

Viewing a response to: @tuck-fheman/re-dantheman-re-macartem-re-dantheman-the-politics-of-negative-voting-20160813t202837226z

politics · @logic · Aug 14 '16

$0.09

Wow, I would never expect such and honest criticism of whale by another whale.  I think that I may be getting my hope back about the future of this community!!!
Nice one @tuck-fheman !

👍 sigmajin, arcurus, whatsup

`author`	logic
`permlink`	re-tuck-fheman-re-dantheman-re-macartem-re-dantheman-the-politics-of-negative-voting-20160814t030858120z
`category`	politics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["politics"],"users":["tuck-fheman"]}
`created`	2016-08-14 03:09:00
`last_update`	2016-08-14 03:09:00
`depth`	4
`children`	2
`last_payout`	2016-09-13 10:57:03
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.070 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.023 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	184
`author_reputation`	92,052,875,413,650
`root_title`	"The Politics of Negative Voting"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	793,590
`net_rshares`	145,838,601,713
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (3)

voter	rshares	pct
sigmajin	113,435,502,358	100%
arcurus	32,351,444,903	100%
whatsup	51,654,452	100%

@logic · Aug 14 '16 (edited)

$0.09

@sigmajin I don't know exact definitions. There seem to be many different definitions around (amounts).
For me anyone, who has got more than 15k Steem Power is a whale (Doplhin is past 1500 SP). Tuck has got almost 66k Steem Power. That's worth 320 BTC !!!!
I don't think that I have ever, personally, known someone who has had that amount of cash (if converted from btc)

👍 sigmajin, jacobcwitmer

`author`	logic
`permlink`	re-logic-re-tuck-fheman-re-dantheman-re-macartem-re-dantheman-the-politics-of-negative-voting-20160814t042635083z
`category`	politics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["politics"],"users":["sigmajin"]}
`created`	2016-08-14 04:26:39
`last_update`	2016-08-14 04:26:57
`depth`	5
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2016-09-13 10:57:03
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.092 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.001 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	371
`author_reputation`	92,052,875,413,650
`root_title`	"The Politics of Negative Voting"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	794,265
`net_rshares`	113,547,068,606
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (2)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
sigmajin	0 B		113,435,502,358	100%
jacobcwitmer	0 B		111,566,248	100%

@sigmajin · Aug 14 '16

$1.37

tucks not really a whale.  i mean, i don't know the formal definition, but i doubt his vote is worth more than a couple bucks.

👍 tuck-fheman, bue, bue-witness, boy, mini, daniel.pan, bunny, healthcare, helen.tan, moon

`author`	sigmajin
`permlink`	re-logic-re-tuck-fheman-re-dantheman-re-macartem-re-dantheman-the-politics-of-negative-voting-20160814t041221201z
`category`	politics
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["politics"]}
`created`	2016-08-14 04:12:15
`last_update`	2016-08-14 04:12:15
`depth`	5
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2016-09-13 10:57:03
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	1.030 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.336 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	126
`author_reputation`	35,847,511,233,614
`root_title`	"The Politics of Negative Voting"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	794,156
`net_rshares`	1,268,318,629,603
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (10)

voter	rshares	pct
boy	3,699,148,058	100%
bue-witness	4,489,427,434	100%
bunny	850,145,767	100%
bue	62,378,103,635	100%
mini	1,983,063,943	100%
moon	255,792,896	100%
healthcare	735,730,887	100%
tuck-fheman	1,192,523,489,646	100%
daniel.pan	1,058,923,656	100%
helen.tan	344,803,681	100%