RE: It has come to my attention that I need to explain things a little more...and this is better! by lucylin

View this thread on: hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com

Viewing a response to: @dexterdumb/re-lucylin-re-dexterdumb-re-lucylin-it-has-come-to-my-attention-that-i-need-to-explain-things-a-little-more-and-this-is-better-20190316t033806898z

blog · @lucylin · Mar 16 '19 (edited)

$0.02

It might be...if I understood what you meant..lol

I mean that the rewards pool as it stands, is no ones property - therefore taking it - however you can - is acceptable.
Without an ethical code in the system (code) there are no ethics.
There can be no theft,  or deception, or cheating....these are ethics.
IF the reward pool belongs to no one -(which I think is correct) then  any actions becomes acceptable - to take a slice,  there is no 'right, wrong, good bad' - just whatever you can get, _however_ you can get it...

Law of the jungle is not a structure that will endure - except as a financial instrument to make profit of price action.
In the 'new world' structure - this is an incorrect model -  this is exactly what _we are all_  railing against...Non ethical structures.

👍 dexterdumb

`author`	lucylin
`permlink`	re-dexterdumb-re-lucylin-re-dexterdumb-re-lucylin-it-has-come-to-my-attention-that-i-need-to-explain-things-a-little-more-and-this-is-better-20190316t040611856z
`category`	blog
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["blog"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2019-03-16 04:06:24
`last_update`	2019-03-16 04:07:12
`depth`	4
`children`	7
`last_payout`	2019-03-23 04:06:24
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.016 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.005 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	783
`author_reputation`	185,811,362,824,733
`root_title`	"It has come to my attention that I need to explain things a little more...and this is better!"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	81,391,089
`net_rshares`	34,537,029,522
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
dexterdumb	0 B		34,537,029,522	50%

@dexterdumb · Mar 17 '19

$0.06

I think it's a very fine line.  Not that it's not worth examining.  Just seems difficult to unwind it all.  I don't necessarily think that making the reward pool privately distributed makes it "closed source" anyway.

👍 dexterdumb, lucylin, sergino

`author`	dexterdumb
`permlink`	re-lucylin-re-dexterdumb-re-lucylin-re-dexterdumb-re-lucylin-it-has-come-to-my-attention-that-i-need-to-explain-things-a-little-more-and-this-is-better-20190317t235915397z
`category`	blog
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["blog"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2019-03-17 23:59:15
`last_update`	2019-03-17 23:59:15
`depth`	5
`children`	6
`last_payout`	2019-03-24 23:59:15
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.043 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.013 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	216
`author_reputation`	2,492,649,115,795
`root_title`	"It has come to my attention that I need to explain things a little more...and this is better!"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	81,488,737
`net_rshares`	85,548,361,592
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (3)

voter	rshares	pct
dexterdumb	63,779,016,639	100%
lucylin	21,452,969,803	100%
sergino	316,375,150	1.5%

@lucylin · Mar 18 '19

$0.05

I' not saying we don't leave it as it is - I'm saying we have to understand  _what it is_ we are dealing with.
....it'll only end in tears if we don't..lol

...the free market concept is wrong. You need to own things to buy and sell.
 This is more akin to a land grab or gold rush (every day)

👍 dexterdumb

`author`	lucylin
`permlink`	re-dexterdumb-re-lucylin-re-dexterdumb-re-lucylin-re-dexterdumb-re-lucylin-it-has-come-to-my-attention-that-i-need-to-explain-things-a-little-more-and-this-is-better-20190318t004735257z
`category`	blog
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["blog"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2019-03-18 00:47:36
`last_update`	2019-03-18 00:47:36
`depth`	6
`children`	5
`last_payout`	2019-03-25 00:47:36
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.036 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.011 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	292
`author_reputation`	185,811,362,824,733
`root_title`	"It has come to my attention that I need to explain things a little more...and this is better!"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	81,490,745
`net_rshares`	69,821,806,669
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (1)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
dexterdumb	0 B		69,821,806,669	100%

@dexterdumb · Mar 20 '19

$0.04

Still makes me wonder how the witnesses "pay their bills" in a model like this.  Unless they just up-vote their own content and comments constantly.  I've never really considered what the economic model on Steemit is.  I'd say it's about time!  Thx for the running start ;)

👍 dexterdumb, votes4minnows

`author`	dexterdumb
`permlink`	re-lucylin-re-dexterdumb-re-lucylin-re-dexterdumb-re-lucylin-re-dexterdumb-re-lucylin-it-has-come-to-my-attention-that-i-need-to-explain-things-a-little-more-and-this-is-better-20190320t011425223z
`category`	blog
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["blog"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
`created`	2019-03-20 01:14:24
`last_update`	2019-03-20 01:14:24
`depth`	7
`children`	4
`last_payout`	2019-03-27 01:14:24
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.034 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.010 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	273
`author_reputation`	2,492,649,115,795
`root_title`	"It has come to my attention that I need to explain things a little more...and this is better!"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	81,599,815
`net_rshares`	67,471,488,340
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (2)

voter	weight	wgt%	rshares	pct	time
dexterdumb	0 B		67,121,385,228	100%
votes4minnows	0 B		350,103,112	2.5%

4 replies