create account

Logic Discussions: Praxeology by lupinate

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com
· @lupinate · (edited)
Logic Discussions: Praxeology
*Praxeology - What is it?*

Praxeology is the study of human activity, specifically the actions we take and consequences that occur as a result.   It is not the same as psychology, which attempts to determine the "why" of an *action* based on biological and personality factors.     Instead, it focuses on the "why" of the *consequences*, attempting to predict the unforseen implications of an action via logic and reason.  It studies all the choices that are *made*, and determines what can be learned from them.  It teaches us to look for both the consequences that can be foreseen,  and those that can be inferred by surrounding events. 

*Okay... Why should I care about this?*

Understanding the logical consequences that result from an action (or praxis) , both the good and bad, is necessary to determine if such actions are beneficial to society or the individual. It also helps in determining the logical real world motivations for an action as well, mainly because every action is predicated on previous ones. 

This is particularly true in the sphere of politics.   Politicians get funding for campaigns from lobbyists and corporate enterprise. This funding then drives their legislative decision making, as they will seek favourable laws and regulations for their backers. This is the main reason why the elite in society can dictate the rules governing that society.

One could claim the personality traits of politicians can be used to predict such behaviour, which may be true.  Unfortunately, such analysis is somewhat speculative because the study of the mind is still an ongoing process, one that is heavily reliant on statistical modelling & theoretical interpretations, and less on logical thought.  This isn't to say that psychology is not a worthwhile field of study, but it's a field which not everyone can easily comprehend. 

One can definitively claim through Praxeology,  however, that *x* action, regardless of the psychological makeup of an individual, can lead to *y* results. To study it requires an understanding of what actions were taken historically, what results occurred, and whether or not other attempts to take the same actions produced those results again. As such, it is far more intuitive and predictable a system of analysis. 

*Praxeology, Politics,  & Economics*

In politics, praxeology is useful for understanding the potential unintended outcomes of policy decisions, the physical motivators for each politician's choices, and the rationales as to why people voting.  For instance, a person struggling to make ends meet on $10/hr will likely vote for someone promising $15/hr minimum wages.  Conversely, applying a $15/hr minimum wage will logically cause one or more of the following for companies that use cheap labour: job losses, increased prices, or restricted growth, all because of the costs associated with increasing minimum labour costs by 50%. 

*Extend it further - what can we infer?* 

If every business knows they can expect more money to be paid out, what stops any business charging even more?  The proportion wage benefits get swallowed up by the inflating prices. This can be seen over time, as the price floor adds to inflation. Companies get subsidises to compensate for these differences, which means more money spent, more national debt, and eventually taxes to fund it (or the interest on the debt at least). 

Then there are the negative effects on those above minimum wage before the change.   If they were already at the proposed new rate, their labour has been effectively devalued to a low paying job.   This is another disincentive to productivity, though it can increase demand for higher wages in other sectors in the future. This drives the cost of business up over time, as logically any price floor will do.  

Raising the price floor does another odd thing - drives companies to automate everything. Once technology becomes a cheaper solution (as it has at McDonalds),  the price floor has eliminated the job market in a company,  and eventually that will spread across the industry.  All because it became too expensive to give a person the job. 

People have a funny way of presuming because something sounds like a good idea, it must be a good idea. Unfortunately, if this were true, the term unintended consequences would be an oxymoron instead of something people have to consider. The PATRIOT act sounded brilliant to many, as does the NSA seeking terror practitioners online.   Unfortunately the unintended consequences include access to every single compromising picture on your phone & PC, the ability to blackmail people in power, and provides the means to access all data online if anyone can break into it (don't presume they can't either, it's been done many times in the past). 

*Praxeology & Real World implications*

Here is a different example, from the private sector - ponzi schemes.   That's right,  the government isn't the only conman out there.   These schemes can be enticing, promising huge returns on investment, but they often lead people into a trap, where only the first ones in can get the biggest payouts.  This is why  it is important to consider any investment carefully. It's like purchasing fruit at a farmers market - sometimes a perfect looking apple has a worm in it. 

 So assuming you decide to invest in anything,  you should consider the consequences of what you decide to put in.   Never spend more than you can afford to lose when investing.  That way if the worst happens,  you haven't ruined your future.  It would be like a day at the races (with a fixed budget)  when all your horses went lame - incredibly painful to watch, but you'll survive it.  And of course if the investment succeeded you'd still make a return, but a less rewarding one.  This way,  at worst you have a null set impact.   It's money you have already assumed you've lost, so to get more back will be a bonus. 

*Conclusion*

Understanding logic is crucial to understand why things have turned out the way they have, instead of how they were intended to turn out. Intentions mean nothing in reality.   What matters in the end are consent and understanding the risks inherent in an action.   Praxeology provides a means of identifying those risks, and helps us determine if they are actually worth taking in the first place. 

For more information visit praxeology.net
👍  , , , , ,
properties (23)
authorlupinate
permlinklogic-discussions-praxeology
categorylogic
json_metadata{"tags":["logic","praxeology",""]}
created2016-08-15 17:39:06
last_update2016-08-16 00:41:51
depth0
children5
last_payout2016-09-15 19:36:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length6,372
author_reputation757,490,775,734
root_title"Logic Discussions: Praxeology"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id820,380
net_rshares1,332,090,847
author_curate_reward""
vote details (6)
@kooshikoo · (edited)
Very interesting. But your minimum wage example was not a good one in my opinion,as the consequences of that is too hard to predict, as you need to determine the possible causal connection between an increased minimum wage and for example job losses. You also might argue that if the increased minimum wage is based on a human rights perspective,and this increase would create problems for the economy(neo-liberalism) then neo-liberalism is flawed,and needs to be changed. This is my conclusion.
👍  ,
properties (23)
authorkooshikoo
permlinkre-lupinate-logic-discussions-praxeology-20160815t174757040z
categorylogic
json_metadata{"tags":["logic"]}
created2016-08-15 17:47:42
last_update2016-08-15 17:48:12
depth1
children4
last_payout2016-09-15 19:36:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length495
author_reputation2,159,492,091,156
root_title"Logic Discussions: Praxeology"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id820,526
net_rshares813,306,177
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@lupinate ·
@kooshikoo thank you for the feedback.  From my perspective the causal link to the issues I listed with minimum wage is cost reduction measures to remain competitive for investment and retain pre-existing margins for profit.   Both are issues to consider when discussing any business.
properties (22)
authorlupinate
permlinkre-kooshikoo-re-lupinate-logic-discussions-praxeology-20160815t180419088z
categorylogic
json_metadata{"tags":["logic"],"users":["kooshikoo"]}
created2016-08-15 18:04:21
last_update2016-08-15 18:04:21
depth2
children3
last_payout2016-09-15 19:36:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length284
author_reputation757,490,775,734
root_title"Logic Discussions: Praxeology"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id820,731
net_rshares0
@kooshikoo ·
Well,your statement  "cost reduction measures to remain competitive for investment and retain pre-existing margins for profit"  does not refer to a causal link,but refers to standard neoliberal economic theories,which are not really provable in my opinion. for instance this quote from a study made by the Center for Economic performance:
 It has proven difficult to identify evidence of negative employment effects
associated with these wage gains. Stewart (2004) has presented robust evidence, from a
range of longitudinal data sources, appearing to show that there have been no reductions
in the employment probabilities of minimum wage workers as compared to workers
slightly higher up the wage distribution. Even in the very low wage labour market for
care assistants, a sector one can view as being highly vulnerable to minimum wage
legislation, Machin, Manning and Rahman (2003) report only moderate disemployment
effects http://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/dp0715.pdf
In any case,the overall impact has to be considered from different perspectives: The national economy as a whole(not just private enterprise) negative effects of poverty which reduce life quality and even harm the economy,such as: Crime,health issues caused by poverty,including drugand alcohol abuse and mental illness(all these are linked).And social instability.
So your praxeology was incomplete.
properties (22)
authorkooshikoo
permlinkre-lupinate-re-kooshikoo-re-lupinate-logic-discussions-praxeology-20160815t185715537z
categorylogic
json_metadata{"tags":["logic"],"links":["http://cep.lse.ac.uk/pubs/download/dp0715.pdf"]}
created2016-08-15 18:57:00
last_update2016-08-15 18:57:00
depth3
children2
last_payout2016-09-15 19:36:06
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length1,375
author_reputation2,159,492,091,156
root_title"Logic Discussions: Praxeology"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id821,505
net_rshares0