The timing of this is clever as Block one also released their version of the constitution. Shame this information was not released before your interview​ with Mr Cox.

Also, EOSStore is​ in trouble for sure.

@marketingmonk sir i can buy EOS?

It looks like Block One can change constitution like Facebook and Google can change their terms and conditions.

The issue isn’t block one voting (they own the tokens). The issue is exchanges voting for themselves using tokens they don’t own (ie in individuals accounts). 
This, combined with the fact most exchanges don’t seem to support most airdrops, should encourage people to take control of their tokens!
If you don’t control your private key, you don’t actually own any crypto.

Not sure why anyone invested in EOS would be surprised by Block.one voting with their tokens. They have tokens, they get a vote. There vote is necessarily large but, what's that got to do with anything? Either you trust EOS, and block.one, or you dont. If you don't probably should unload the EOS tokens, because Block.one is a big deal for EOS.

@marketingmonk  i think this is the best time to invest EOS,

**Ru**
Приветствую. Представляю студию блокчейн-копирайтинга. Предлагаю наши услуги по написанию WhitePaper, созданию видеороликов , написанию уникальных статей и обзоров (в том числе для steemit), переводов.  Огромный опыт и большой штат сотрудников. Списко наших услуг и портфолио в нашем [телеграм канале]( @contentmakerstudio) или на [сайте](http://contentmaker.studio).
**En**
Hello everyone! I present to you our blockchain copywriting studio. We propose to you next services: writing WhitePaper, creating videos, , translations, writing unique articles and reviews (Including for steemit). Extensive experience and highly qualified team. List of services and portforlio in our [telegram channel](@contentmakerstudio) or on our [website](http://contentmaker.studio).

Wow. the great information about incoming EOS. Thanks.

People should not complain about Block One voting as the lower remains with the token holders which will need to exercise their vote to influence their thoughts.  That is the purpose of having the vote so that one’s perspective be heard.  They need to vote for their interest as well...

This move makes me wonder if this was one of the bigger reasons why block.one avoided being labeled as the 'owner' or 'maintainer' of EOS. With this design block.one are able to act as a normal user with more influence to steer network governance.

It's difficult to pinpoint which way their votes could tip the scale between benefiting EOS holders, or benefiting BPs.

<p><blockquote>com/dlPc9P
Reddit: https://www</blockquote> </p></p>In my blog, perhaps, a new entry will appear due to this piece of your blog.</p></p>

My biggest issue with this is the push for supporting approval of 50 producers per account. With that, they can realistically appoint all BPs and backups with a single vote. IMO it should be reduced, not increased.

Great post! very informative :)