Block size is an important indicator of blockchain activity and performance, with Steem blocks passing 4 millions now, I thought it would be interesting to take a closer look to the block size evolution over the past few months. Our first chart is a semi-logarithmic chart of overall block size, highlighting the min, average and max block sizes recorded since the first block. #### Overall daily block size (in bytes)  | | | |---|---| | Min | 115 bytes| | Avg | 489 bytes| | Max | 1697403 bytes| | Deviation | 7678 bytes| Other than the obvious growth in the average block size which is a good indicator that posting have been more active lately, we notice also that some blocks are still empty, which indicates that we are nowhere near congestion levels, and the blockchain is still handling the quantity of data very well, even during the peaks to 1.69 mb block size reached during the last spam attack. Another important thing is that the reduction of block size to mitigate this kind of attacks have successfully limited the max size to 65 kb, which we can see is now the max size in the latest blocks. In our next chart, we take a look at the cumulative linear block size: #### Overall daily cumulative block size (in bytes)  In this chart we can see that there is a definitive increase of block size growth over the past two weeks, which confirms steemers have been very active posting lately. The current total size of blocks is around 2 gb, which has doubled since July, 22th. Our last chart highlights the block size recorded in the past week: #### Last week's hourly block size (in bytes)  | | | |---|---| | Min | 115 bytes| | Avg | 1322 bytes| | Max | 65353 bytes| | Deviation | 2002 bytes| In this chart, we can see that the block size is now stabilized around an average of 1.3 kb with spikes to the max block size and also dips to the min size. The deviation also went down, which indicates more blocks are close to the median size. In conclusion, we can see that steem blockchain has successfully supported an important block size increase, and does seem to be ready for much more, as we still have many empty blocks. The increase of the average block size itself is also an indicator of the growth in activity, which correlates with the growth in users.
author | masteryoda |
---|---|
permlink | a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats","steem-stats","steem"],"image":["http://i.imgsafe.org/f39d67f077.png"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 15:56:00 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 17:06:33 |
depth | 0 |
children | 54 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 279.142 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 36.123 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 2,451 |
author_reputation | 130,752,413,451,298 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 784,163 |
net_rshares | 39,366,798,045,515 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
smooth | 0 | 22,535,604,465,362 | 100% | ||
highasfuck | 0 | 90,585,867,615 | 100% | ||
boy | 0 | 3,081,785,807 | 100% | ||
bue-witness | 0 | 3,740,133,926 | 100% | ||
bunny | 0 | 708,287,640 | 100% | ||
steemychicken1 | 0 | 1,417,472,279,516 | 100% | ||
bue | 0 | 51,887,697,872 | 100% | ||
mini | 0 | 1,652,122,673 | 100% | ||
moon | 0 | 208,853,970 | 100% | ||
alex90342fastn1 | 0 | 101,637,952,129 | 100% | ||
joseph | 0 | 1,463,648,535,707 | 100% | ||
recursive2 | 0 | 430,543,041,008 | 100% | ||
recursive3 | 0 | 429,389,390,511 | 100% | ||
masteryoda | 0 | 449,921,365,310 | 100% | ||
recursive | 0 | 2,665,565,647,195 | 100% | ||
smooth.witness | 0 | 3,728,047,235,699 | 100% | ||
steempower | 0 | 1,132,561,164,020 | 100% | ||
healthcare | 0 | 612,972,793 | 100% | ||
daniel.pan | 0 | 882,223,788 | 100% | ||
dedriss | 0 | 24,728,715,682 | 100% | ||
team | 0 | 124,690,971,176 | 100% | ||
linouxis9 | 0 | 111,248,205,194 | 100% | ||
helen.tan | 0 | 287,287,336 | 100% | ||
yefet | 0 | 24,196,518,059 | 100% | ||
bhokor | 0 | 8,030,106,550 | 100% | ||
chris4210 | 0 | 134,932,622,811 | 100% | ||
noaommerrr | 0 | 153,607,896,174 | 100% | ||
acidsun | 0 | 87,105,628,903 | 100% | ||
merlinscat | 0 | 27,422,137,560 | 100% | ||
craig-grant | 0 | 124,006,184,732 | 100% | ||
ninzacode | 0 | 18,466,621,485 | 100% | ||
paco-steem | 0 | 399,224,420 | 80% | ||
spaninv | 0 | 4,569,194,509 | 80% | ||
pal | 0 | 242,552,569,068 | 100% | ||
daycrypter | 0 | 3,480,430,494 | 100% | ||
hannixx42 | 0 | 56,620,699,283 | 100% | ||
coar | 0 | 1,832,415,580 | 100% | ||
asch | 0 | 58,893,362,093 | 100% | ||
murh | 0 | 1,449,142,782 | 33.01% | ||
edtorrez | 0 | 276,718,704 | 100% | ||
cyber | 0 | 431,192,928,173 | 100% | ||
btcturbo | 0 | 12,773,048,103 | 100% | ||
irit | 0 | 139,105,642 | 100% | ||
thecryptofiend | 0 | 10,739,159,033 | 100% | ||
taoteh1221 | 0 | 265,055,214,392 | 100% | ||
stiletto | 0 | 312,189,371 | 80% | ||
hedge-x | 0 | 213,833,712,562 | 100% | ||
sunnyray | 0 | 839,268,044 | 100% | ||
ratel | 0 | 65,143,154,818 | 100% | ||
minfon | 0 | 17,602,238,862 | 100% | ||
will-zewe | 0 | 195,428,022,893 | 100% | ||
kennyskitchen | 0 | 4,773,221,084 | 100% | ||
facer | 0 | 13,113,538,789 | 100% | ||
tim-johnston | 0 | 73,848,416,288 | 100% | ||
magdalena | 0 | 401,543,158 | 100% | ||
trogdor | 0 | 238,266,722,842 | 100% | ||
g-dubs | 0 | 3,253,896,973 | 100% | ||
thedashguy | 0 | 107,779,156,441 | 100% | ||
geoffrey | 0 | 43,102,484,541 | 100% | ||
kimziv | 0 | 236,232,016,058 | 100% | ||
alex-hulsmeier | 0 | 1,024,716,351 | 100% | ||
honeythief | 0 | 32,041,617,843 | 100% | ||
allyourbase | 0 | 3,058,953,026 | 100% | ||
primus | 0 | 6,293,024,536 | 100% | ||
arcaneinfo | 0 | 5,453,226,442 | 100% | ||
michaellamden68 | 0 | 1,476,543,722 | 100% | ||
kosimoos | 0 | 317,366,834 | 100% | ||
orly | 0 | 1,914,160,801 | 100% | ||
brunopro | 0 | 22,983,021,419 | 100% | ||
allycat | 0 | 9,106,312,003 | 100% | ||
jackkang | 0 | 53,680,646,870 | 100% | ||
manoami | 0 | 4,376,383,083 | 100% | ||
r4fken | 0 | 31,796,917,271 | 100% | ||
shayne | 0 | 1,248,044,800 | 100% | ||
domino | 0 | 220,516,126,169 | 100% | ||
hammurabi | 0 | 7,898,441,933 | 100% | ||
busser | 0 | 468,417,024 | 100% | ||
owdy | 0 | 1,996,718,748 | 100% | ||
knircky | 0 | 107,758,478,435 | 100% | ||
spiz0r | 0 | 9,414,206,282 | 100% | ||
ausbitbank | 0 | 18,640,358,414 | 100% | ||
dicov | 0 | 1,201,344,313 | 100% | ||
marcgodard | 0 | 1,283,271,181 | 100% | ||
cryptobarry | 0 | 19,385,241,853 | 100% | ||
asim | 0 | 7,455,530,722 | 100% | ||
jesta | 0 | 111,422,591,077 | 100% | ||
toxonaut | 0 | 31,764,551,631 | 100% | ||
paco | 0 | 81,769,310,284 | 100% | ||
biophil | 0 | 32,671,505,650 | 100% | ||
speda | 0 | 116,017,400,039 | 100% | ||
karen13 | 0 | 3,709,727,901 | 100% | ||
sephiroth | 0 | 49,119,834,078 | 100% | ||
dr2073 | 0 | 279,784,469 | 100% | ||
vorsseli | 0 | 1,082,632,514 | 100% | ||
demotruk | 0 | 46,967,647,599 | 100% | ||
maximkichev | 0 | 1,440,949,950 | 100% | ||
nippel66 | 0 | 5,895,204,170 | 100% | ||
imp3 | 0 | 1,720,164,672 | 100% | ||
natalyt | 0 | 420,948,658 | 100% | ||
poseidon | 0 | 2,978,320,802 | 100% | ||
thylbom | 0 | 26,336,543,098 | 100% | ||
rules169 | 0 | 977,124,133 | 100% | ||
royaltiffany | 0 | 24,337,531,147 | 100% | ||
bones | 0 | 2,435,381,169 | 100% | ||
vlad | 0 | 531,512,571 | 100% | ||
tarindel | 0 | 3,685,871,010 | 100% | ||
breakfastchief | 0 | 4,881,340,170 | 100% | ||
liberosist | 0 | 79,046,064,527 | 100% | ||
cryptohustlin | 0 | 1,822,156,877 | 100% | ||
celsius100 | 0 | 15,121,231,631 | 100% | ||
sauravrungta | 0 | 15,871,183,399 | 100% | ||
neroru | 0 | 7,782,230,900 | 100% | ||
jl777 | 0 | 179,669,284,373 | 100% | ||
yarly | 0 | 1,056,123,314 | 100% | ||
yarly2 | 0 | 266,399,574 | 100% | ||
yarly3 | 0 | 266,801,043 | 100% | ||
yarly4 | 0 | 161,491,922 | 100% | ||
yarly5 | 0 | 155,780,307 | 100% | ||
yarly6 | 0 | 42,926,104 | 100% | ||
yarly7 | 0 | 89,007,960 | 100% | ||
arnob | 0 | 125,242,963 | 100% | ||
tony.jennings | 0 | 3,181,903,319 | 100% | ||
lemooljiang | 0 | 9,628,818,356 | 100% | ||
jennamarbles | 0 | 16,545,882,666 | 100% | ||
kooshikoo | 0 | 323,486,217 | 100% | ||
proto | 0 | 16,000,607,085 | 100% | ||
curator | 0 | 592,440,516 | 100% | ||
trisnawati | 0 | 995,901,517 | 100% | ||
yarly10 | 0 | 217,978,643 | 100% | ||
yarly11 | 0 | 129,437,060 | 100% | ||
royalmacro | 0 | 1,905,145,723 | 100% | ||
michaeldodridge | 0 | 10,657,976,760 | 100% | ||
yarly12 | 0 | 63,531,291 | 100% | ||
yarly13 | 0 | 42,170,227 | 100% | ||
elliottgodard | 0 | 81,892,007 | 100% | ||
nadira | 0 | 118,540,293 | 100% | ||
creatorgalaxy | 0 | 115,103,036 | 100% | ||
unseenuno | 0 | 5,417,376,827 | 100% | ||
taz | 0 | 186,475,167 | 100% | ||
youngkim | 0 | 6,708,213,643 | 100% | ||
steemster1 | 0 | 125,566,662 | 100% | ||
bullionstackers | 0 | 805,596,710 | 100% | ||
investing | 0 | 57,798,497,033 | 100% | ||
buyselltrade | 0 | 77,956,267 | 100% | ||
sujoy1990 | 0 | 115,596,933 | 100% | ||
jed78 | 0 | 2,324,242,857 | 100% | ||
metaflute | 0 | 1,141,191,737 | 100% | ||
yulia98 | 0 | 118,274,639 | 100% | ||
ragini00 | 0 | 193,451,437 | 100% | ||
taker | 0 | 7,763,003,994 | 100% | ||
sharon | 0 | 49,798,097 | 100% | ||
johnblow | 0 | 46,357,425 | 100% | ||
atkins | 0 | 71,346,802 | 100% | ||
ronald0 | 0 | 70,187,367 | 100% | ||
jerremie | 0 | 71,214,797 | 100% | ||
steampty | 0 | 71,382,241 | 100% | ||
rosamund | 0 | 68,398,263 | 100% | ||
lillianjones | 0 | 50,731,326 | 100% | ||
rawnetics | 0 | 6,744,134,892 | 100% | ||
spaceghost | 0 | 7,930,679,138 | 100% | ||
myfirst | 0 | 11,586,691,360 | 100% | ||
mariadianaelaine | 0 | 354,836,294 | 100% | ||
timelapse | 0 | 12,597,922,414 | 100% | ||
crypto-toll | 0 | 2,173,710,700 | 100% | ||
kurtbeil | 0 | 5,710,928,521 | 100% | ||
fairider1 | 0 | 59,366,744 | 100% | ||
joele | 0 | 25,447,818,340 | 100% | ||
sirwinchester | 0 | 13,274,647,136 | 100% | ||
dona.apriyanti | 0 | 84,656,050 | 100% | ||
msjennifer | 0 | 51,120,963 | 100% | ||
alifton | 0 | 327,617,804 | 100% | ||
ciao | 0 | 34,309,489 | 100% | ||
jrcornel | 0 | 66,237,686 | 100% | ||
steemo | 0 | 33,269,990 | 100% | ||
steema | 0 | 34,413,207 | 100% | ||
deepdarkweb | 0 | 396,259,651 | 100% | ||
gamerate | 0 | 20,484,992 | 100% | ||
vootka | 0 | 80,282,583 | 100% | ||
confucius | 0 | 45,326,936 | 100% | ||
immortality | 0 | 61,696,026 | 100% | ||
future-shock | 0 | 96,714,573 | 100% | ||
solar | 0 | 9,993,457,408 | 100% | ||
immortal | 0 | 61,150,289 | 100% | ||
jarvis | 0 | 33,686,275 | 100% | ||
ashwim | 0 | 393,838,823 | 100% | ||
eternal | 0 | 39,802,149 | 100% | ||
fortuner | 0 | 44,657,425 | 100% | ||
longevity | 0 | 71,432,076 | 100% | ||
rashka | 0 | 60,661,014 | 100% | ||
filmaker | 0 | 58,287,873 | 100% | ||
alfaman | 0 | 59,335,193 | 100% | ||
and1jey | 0 | 313,335,261 | 100% | ||
stevenh512 | 0 | 109,148,249 | 100% | ||
johnbyrd | 0 | 43,612,367 | 100% | ||
thomasaustin | 0 | 43,610,310 | 100% | ||
thermor | 0 | 43,608,767 | 100% | ||
ficholl | 0 | 43,606,434 | 100% | ||
widell | 0 | 43,603,052 | 100% | ||
mada | 0 | 616,526,017 | 100% | ||
revelbrooks | 0 | 43,291,076 | 100% | ||
elenadranovskaya | 0 | 96,915,823 | 100% | ||
jimmco | 0 | 21,533,909,420 | 100% | ||
yef99 | 0 | 12,027,394,361 | 100% | ||
slorunner | 0 | 77,146,133 | 100% | ||
disletti | 0 | 56,582,087 | 100% | ||
curpose | 0 | 42,395,632 | 100% | ||
mfeu | 0 | 179,671,454 | 100% | ||
chanda | 0 | 54,922,551 | 100% | ||
terryrall | 0 | 1,173,039,737 | 100% | ||
adrevel | 0 | 64,766,741 | 100% | ||
eileenbeach | 0 | 1,498,896,799 | 100% | ||
themonetaryfew | 0 | 247,100,098 | 100% | ||
lenar | 0 | 84,991,821 | 100% | ||
mrainp | 0 | 96,450,958 | 100% | ||
etcmike | 0 | 4,379,556,368 | 100% | ||
erob | 0 | 57,881,874 | 100% | ||
xavimm | 0 | 57,929,064 | 100% | ||
trendwizard | 0 | 55,218,505 | 100% | ||
daveks | 0 | 333,147,129 | 100% | ||
darrantrute | 0 | 4,284,397,006 | 100% | ||
jennsky | 0 | 142,455,493 | 100% | ||
blackeyed | 0 | 58,483,072 | 100% | ||
troich | 0 | 41,595,081 | 100% | ||
cryptohazard | 0 | 57,259,315 | 100% | ||
markrmorrisjr | 0 | 53,031,035 | 100% | ||
crion | 0 | 41,599,412 | 100% | ||
hitherise | 0 | 41,334,048 | 100% | ||
wiss | 0 | 41,327,155 | 100% | ||
ghasemkiani | 0 | 53,723,115 | 100% | ||
thepoet | 0 | 52,604,381 | 100% | ||
ericbotticelli | 0 | 3,131,841,458 | 100% | ||
stroully | 0 | 41,048,924 | 100% | ||
thadm | 0 | 42,994,989 | 100% | ||
prof | 0 | 42,993,519 | 100% | ||
readwriteshare | 0 | 51,738,792 | 100% | ||
yorsens | 0 | 48,166,948 | 100% | ||
francofromottawa | 0 | 52,434,803 | 100% | ||
keeperofthegrove | 0 | 54,591,416 | 100% | ||
dereremit | 0 | 0 | 100% | ||
sorath | 0 | 53,473,547 | 100% |
The growth is Great! Thank s @masteryoda!
author | arcaneinfo |
---|---|
permlink | re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t164627861z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"],"users":["masteryoda"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 16:46:30 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 16:47:15 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.322 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.103 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 41 |
author_reputation | 14,902,978,467,172 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 784,959 |
net_rshares | 483,101,404,968 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
masteryoda | 0 | 477,189,326,844 | 100% | ||
arcaneinfo | 0 | 5,453,226,442 | 100% | ||
fabiocortes10 | 0 | 458,851,682 | 100% |
Bitcoin has 1MB block size (max). Steem has how much max 2MB ? nice post !!!
author | arnob |
---|---|
permlink | re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t160743667z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 16:07:36 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 16:07:36 |
depth | 1 |
children | 1 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.328 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.107 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 76 |
author_reputation | 34,520,611,629,153 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 784,332 |
net_rshares | 491,356,849,758 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
masteryoda | 0 | 490,823,307,611 | 100% | ||
fabiocortes10 | 0 | 448,654,978 | 100% | ||
cryptoeasy | 0 | 84,887,169 | 100% |
Check @smooth reply above.
author | masteryoda |
---|---|
permlink | re-arnob-re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t171706581z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"],"users":["smooth"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 17:17:12 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 17:17:12 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.420 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 26 |
author_reputation | 130,752,413,451,298 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 785,393 |
net_rshares | 477,271,856,036 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
masteryoda | 0 | 477,189,326,844 | 100% | ||
cryptoeasy | 0 | 82,529,192 | 100% |
very helpful topics :D
author | arnob |
---|---|
permlink | re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t192054377z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 19:20:48 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 19:20:48 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.330 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.039 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 22 |
author_reputation | 34,520,611,629,153 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 787,538 |
net_rshares | 423,284,148,943 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
masteryoda | 0 | 422,709,819,979 | 100% | ||
fabiocortes10 | 0 | 489,441,795 | 100% | ||
cryptoeasy | 0 | 84,887,169 | 100% |
Hi! @masteryoda STEEM of block size of growth is testament to the growth of steemit. Also I hope more and more of the growth in the future.
author | asim |
---|---|
permlink | re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t160501622z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 16:05:03 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 16:05:03 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.328 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.107 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 139 |
author_reputation | 9,060,825,259,513 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 784,305 |
net_rshares | 490,905,836,803 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
masteryoda | 0 | 490,823,307,611 | 100% | ||
cryptoeasy | 0 | 82,529,192 | 100% |
I guess it's your first post about block-size of steem. ok, if possible then regular update it. thanks
author | atkins |
---|---|
permlink | re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t162534512z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 16:25:24 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 16:25:24 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.308 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.100 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 102 |
author_reputation | 8,678,216,171,659 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 784,617 |
net_rshares | 463,635,517,292 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
masteryoda | 0 | 463,555,346,077 | 100% | ||
cryptoeasy | 0 | 80,171,215 | 100% |
wow, good data thank you for share
author | bhokor |
---|---|
permlink | re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t213741040z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 21:37:48 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 21:37:48 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.288 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.092 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 34 |
author_reputation | 1,535,566,094,086 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 789,536 |
net_rshares | 437,053,173,493 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
masteryoda | 0 | 436,496,879,960 | 100% | ||
fabiocortes10 | 0 | 469,048,387 | 100% | ||
cryptoeasy | 0 | 87,245,146 | 100% |
You say the current total size of blocks is 2GB; you mean that's the size of the entire blockchain? And that's *doubled* since July 22? And everybody running a full node has a complete copy of that? It makes me wonder if this sort of growth is sustainable.
author | biophil |
---|---|
permlink | re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t160506762z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 16:05:06 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 16:05:06 |
depth | 1 |
children | 3 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.378 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.114 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 257 |
author_reputation | 45,223,914,794,461 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 784,307 |
net_rshares | 547,957,678,539 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
masteryoda | 0 | 504,457,288,378 | 100% | ||
thecryptofiend | 0 | 10,739,281,388 | 100% | ||
biophil | 0 | 32,671,505,650 | 100% | ||
cryptoeasy | 0 | 89,603,123 | 100% |
@biophil 2GB isn't bad at all that's still small enough to fit on a cheap flash drive. Some block chains are 20 times that size and run just fine like Ethereum. Storage is super cheap. Not to mention there's a big difference between storing the whole block chain for archival purposes, and actually needing to backtrack through it regularly. The former is easily done on a mechanical drive because read/write speeds and seek times aren't really an issue. If the latter was the case it would pretty much require a RAID of SSD's to mitigate the speed issue of random seeks and the reading/writing of non sequential sectors on a drive.
author | alifton |
---|---|
permlink | re-biophil-re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160814t013417464z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"],"users":["biophil"]} |
created | 2016-08-14 01:34:21 |
last_update | 2016-08-14 01:35:39 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 639 |
author_reputation | 661,948,714,392 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 792,656 |
net_rshares | 0 |
Yes the size of the blockchain is around 2 gb now, it is sustainable because the trusted full nodes are run by witnesses which need to keep their hardware up to the requirements.
author | masteryoda |
---|---|
permlink | re-biophil-re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t171126071z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 17:11:30 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 17:11:30 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.474 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 178 |
author_reputation | 130,752,413,451,298 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 785,312 |
net_rshares | 530,174,145,627 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
masteryoda | 0 | 518,091,269,145 | 100% | ||
thecryptofiend | 0 | 11,634,221,504 | 100% | ||
fabiocortes10 | 0 | 448,654,978 | 100% | ||
halfik | 0 | 0 | 100% |
Easily, http://pricewatch.com lists a 6 Tb drive for $170. I could put a NAS with 18 TB together for about $1000, with RAID 0
author | wizwom |
---|---|
permlink | re-biophil-re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t214220745z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"],"links":["http://pricewatch.com"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 21:42:15 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 21:42:15 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 125 |
author_reputation | 394,537,111,361 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 789,591 |
net_rshares | 0 |
Looks like it moving quite steady at the moment. While the surging of the cumulative is up trend. Thanks master @masteryoda Another insight 👍👍👍 Up 🚀🚀🚀
author | bullionstackers |
---|---|
permlink | re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t160846390z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"],"users":["masteryoda"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 16:08:48 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 16:08:48 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.296 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.098 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 150 |
author_reputation | 163,180,943,634,376 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 784,356 |
net_rshares | 449,921,365,310 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
masteryoda | 0 | 449,921,365,310 | 100% |
Great! What is maximal tx/sec for Steem blockchain? Can it compete to maior card systems?
author | busser |
---|---|
permlink | re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t180144109z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 18:01:51 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 18:01:51 |
depth | 1 |
children | 2 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.288 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.092 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 89 |
author_reputation | 27,163,876,716,731 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 786,169 |
net_rshares | 436,465,633,633 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
masteryoda | 0 | 436,322,330,121 | 100% | ||
cryptoeasy | 0 | 91,961,100 | 100% | ||
francofromottawa | 0 | 51,342,412 | 100% |
On BitShares Graphene publicly demonstrated 1000 TPS with unoptimized network code. When you factor the network out of the equation the unoptimized evaluation code can handle 100,000 TPS.
author | dantheman |
---|---|
permlink | re-busser-re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t183524160z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 18:35:24 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 18:35:24 |
depth | 2 |
children | 1 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.376 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.005 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 188 |
author_reputation | 240,292,002,602,347 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 786,781 |
net_rshares | 447,658,333,399 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
masteryoda | 0 | 436,322,330,121 | 100% | ||
fabiocortes10 | 0 | 448,654,978 | 100% | ||
exitmass | 0 | 10,797,745,177 | 100% | ||
cryptoeasy | 0 | 89,603,123 | 100% |
Thanks @dantheman for the tech details, really ineteresting!
author | masteryoda |
---|---|
permlink | re-dantheman-re-busser-re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t183844592z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"],"users":["dantheman"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 18:38:48 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 18:38:48 |
depth | 3 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.382 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 60 |
author_reputation | 130,752,413,451,298 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 786,852 |
net_rshares | 436,411,933,244 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
masteryoda | 0 | 436,322,330,121 | 100% | ||
cryptoeasy | 0 | 89,603,123 | 100% |
is there a site that displays this data? Or did you compile it locally?
author | dooberdoober |
---|---|
permlink | re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20171008t015243965z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2017-10-08 01:52:45 |
last_update | 2017-10-08 01:52:45 |
depth | 1 |
children | 1 |
last_payout | 2017-10-15 01:52:45 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 71 |
author_reputation | 10,357,614,351 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 17,059,525 |
net_rshares | 0 |
I searched recently and came up with nothing.
author | dooberdoober |
---|---|
permlink | re-dooberdoober-re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20171008t015316683z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"],"app":"steemit/0.1"} |
created | 2017-10-08 01:53:15 |
last_update | 2017-10-08 01:53:15 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2017-10-15 01:53:15 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 45 |
author_reputation | 10,357,614,351 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 17,059,553 |
net_rshares | 0 |
Can explain to me the drop in the average cost of steem, even with the growth in activity
author | erob |
---|---|
permlink | re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t160355753z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 16:04:00 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 16:04:00 |
depth | 1 |
children | 2 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 89 |
author_reputation | 7,553,555,838 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 784,284 |
net_rshares | 56,724,237 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
erob | 0 | 56,724,237 | 100% |
Actually market price cannot be immediately correlating to the activity, in the long term the growth in activity should impact the price.
author | masteryoda |
---|---|
permlink | re-erob-re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t171621257z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 17:16:27 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 17:16:27 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.446 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 137 |
author_reputation | 130,752,413,451,298 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 785,381 |
net_rshares | 502,103,969,873 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
masteryoda | 0 | 490,823,307,611 | 100% | ||
thecryptofiend | 0 | 10,739,281,388 | 100% | ||
fabiocortes10 | 0 | 458,851,682 | 100% | ||
cryptoeasy | 0 | 82,529,192 | 100% |
Anytime someone gets paid in SBD and cashes out... its basically getting that from the market cap.
author | truthtaco |
---|---|
permlink | re-erob-re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t170112988z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 17:01:09 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 17:01:09 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 98 |
author_reputation | 6,433,018,616,216 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 785,172 |
net_rshares | 0 |
Thank you for your charts and analysis. Always informative and greatly appreciated. I am looking forward to your next analysis of this vibrant steemit community. Steem on, Mike
author | etcmike |
---|---|
permlink | re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t162627996z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 16:26:24 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 16:26:24 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.316 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.103 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 179 |
author_reputation | 534,676,096,189,306 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 784,631 |
net_rshares | 477,269,498,059 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
masteryoda | 0 | 477,189,326,844 | 100% | ||
cryptoeasy | 0 | 80,171,215 | 100% |
nice post. your chart shows one big "bounce" . would you please, explain this ?
author | jerremie |
---|---|
permlink | re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t162847959z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 16:28:42 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 16:28:42 |
depth | 1 |
children | 1 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.298 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.096 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 79 |
author_reputation | 5,314,569,285,879 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 784,682 |
net_rshares | 450,006,252,479 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
masteryoda | 0 | 449,921,365,310 | 100% | ||
cryptoeasy | 0 | 84,887,169 | 100% |
That peak was caused by a bot spam attack, which then was made impossible by a hardfork reducing some max values.
author | masteryoda |
---|---|
permlink | re-jerremie-re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t172143116z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 17:21:48 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 17:21:48 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.394 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 113 |
author_reputation | 130,752,413,451,298 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 785,464 |
net_rshares | 450,003,894,502 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
masteryoda | 0 | 449,921,365,310 | 100% | ||
cryptoeasy | 0 | 82,529,192 | 100% |
love your stats posts @masteryoda
author | kenjiby |
---|---|
permlink | re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t202156942z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"],"users":["masteryoda"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 20:22:00 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 20:22:15 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.288 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.092 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 33 |
author_reputation | 8,543,158,141,728 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 788,489 |
net_rshares | 437,063,370,197 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
masteryoda | 0 | 436,496,879,960 | 100% | ||
fabiocortes10 | 0 | 479,245,091 | 100% | ||
cryptoeasy | 0 | 87,245,146 | 100% |
As a minor note, setting up a miner, you download the blockchain from @steemychicken1 website and just rescan with client. https://steemit.com/steemservices/@steemychicken1/steemit-blockchain-download
author | magnebit |
---|---|
permlink | re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t191131300z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"],"users":["steemychicken1"],"links":["https://steemit.com/steemservices/@steemychicken1/steemit-blockchain-download"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 19:10:57 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 19:10:57 |
depth | 1 |
children | 2 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.380 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.001 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 201 |
author_reputation | 4,957,809,430,246 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 787,384 |
net_rshares | 436,900,466,261 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
masteryoda | 0 | 436,333,976,024 | 100% | ||
fabiocortes10 | 0 | 479,245,091 | 100% | ||
cryptoeasy | 0 | 87,245,146 | 100% |
my ESET antivirus blocks every time when I try to visit steemitup.eu. Is it really dangerous site ?
author | arnob |
---|---|
permlink | re-magnebit-re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t192838313z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 19:28:30 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 19:28:30 |
depth | 2 |
children | 1 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 99 |
author_reputation | 34,520,611,629,153 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 787,664 |
net_rshares | 0 |
I get this error and I ignore it......Site is just a button that starts an FTP....Also, the site is : //www.steemitup.eu Your connection is not private. Attackers might be trying to steal your information from www.steemitup.eu (for example, passwords, messages, or credit cards). NET::ERR_CERT_AUTHORITY_INVALID
author | magnebit |
---|---|
permlink | re-arnob-re-magnebit-re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t193512764z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 19:34:36 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 19:34:36 |
depth | 3 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 313 |
author_reputation | 4,957,809,430,246 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 787,759 |
net_rshares | 0 |
Thank you for compiling these stats, and thank you for the knowledge!
author | michaellamden68 |
---|---|
permlink | re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t165149397z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 16:51:48 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 16:52:06 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.365 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.083 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 69 |
author_reputation | 98,902,028,363,203 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 785,046 |
net_rshares | 505,933,832,100 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
masteryoda | 0 | 504,457,288,378 | 100% | ||
michaellamden68 | 0 | 1,476,543,722 | 100% |
oh! so nice post. thanks!
author | nadira |
---|---|
permlink | re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t161227425z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 16:12:18 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 16:12:18 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.300 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.096 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 25 |
author_reputation | 16,131,500,673,289 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 784,415 |
net_rshares | 450,480,016,820 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
masteryoda | 0 | 449,921,365,310 | 100% | ||
fabiocortes10 | 0 | 469,048,387 | 100% | ||
cryptoeasy | 0 | 89,603,123 | 100% |
@masteryoda could you perhaps make a graphic of current steem users Nationality?
author | poseidon |
---|---|
permlink | re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t163037145z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"],"users":["masteryoda"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 16:30:36 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 16:30:36 |
depth | 1 |
children | 3 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 80 |
author_reputation | 822,781,252,769 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 784,717 |
net_rshares | 0 |
Nationality is not stored in the blockcahin, thus there is no way to get that info.
author | masteryoda |
---|---|
permlink | re-poseidon-re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t171813472z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 17:18:18 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 17:18:18 |
depth | 2 |
children | 2 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.420 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 83 |
author_reputation | 130,752,413,451,298 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 785,419 |
net_rshares | 477,729,942,922 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
masteryoda | 0 | 477,189,326,844 | 100% | ||
fabiocortes10 | 0 | 448,654,978 | 100% | ||
cryptoeasy | 0 | 91,961,100 | 100% |
What about steemit chat? It does give the time relative to user. That could help. Or make a website with the sole purpose to find out this statistic?
author | poseidon |
---|---|
permlink | re-masteryoda-re-poseidon-re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t172955614z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 17:29:57 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 17:29:57 |
depth | 3 |
children | 1 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.354 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.030 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 149 |
author_reputation | 822,781,252,769 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 785,611 |
net_rshares | 439,429,438,156 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
masteryoda | 0 | 436,299,034,331 | 100% | ||
poseidon | 0 | 3,038,442,725 | 100% | ||
cryptoeasy | 0 | 91,961,100 | 100% |
very good work keep it up :)
author | ragini00 |
---|---|
permlink | re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t161925771z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 16:19:15 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 16:19:15 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.308 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.100 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 28 |
author_reputation | 2,580,347,549,382 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 784,521 |
net_rshares | 463,635,517,292 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
masteryoda | 0 | 463,555,346,077 | 100% | ||
cryptoeasy | 0 | 80,171,215 | 100% |
yes ...... agree with you. If everyday blocksize will grow then it 'll mean that steem will be popular more and more :)
author | ragini00 |
---|---|
permlink | re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t162348704z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 16:23:39 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 16:23:39 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.308 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.100 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 119 |
author_reputation | 2,580,347,549,382 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 784,583 |
net_rshares | 464,113,997,587 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
masteryoda | 0 | 463,555,346,077 | 100% | ||
fabiocortes10 | 0 | 469,048,387 | 100% | ||
cryptoeasy | 0 | 89,603,123 | 100% |
wow! blocksize is increasing ......... that's good :-)
author | ronald0 |
---|---|
permlink | re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t162705645z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 16:26:57 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 16:26:57 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.316 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.103 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 54 |
author_reputation | 2,505,700,773,001 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 784,645 |
net_rshares | 477,728,349,741 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
masteryoda | 0 | 477,189,326,844 | 100% | ||
fabiocortes10 | 0 | 458,851,682 | 100% | ||
cryptoeasy | 0 | 80,171,215 | 100% |
your all posts about steem statistics are great :D
author | rosamund |
---|---|
permlink | re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t161113676z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 16:11:06 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 16:11:06 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.298 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.096 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 50 |
author_reputation | 3,301,558,901,213 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 784,392 |
net_rshares | 450,010,968,433 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
masteryoda | 0 | 449,921,365,310 | 100% | ||
cryptoeasy | 0 | 89,603,123 | 100% |
oh! very good chart. I see at 22 July block size exceeded max size. Great Post Man :)
author | royalmacro |
---|---|
permlink | re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t160519835z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 16:05:12 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 16:05:12 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.328 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.107 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 85 |
author_reputation | 181,020,262,458,461 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 784,308 |
net_rshares | 491,362,330,508 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
masteryoda | 0 | 490,823,307,611 | 100% | ||
fabiocortes10 | 0 | 458,851,682 | 100% | ||
cryptoeasy | 0 | 80,171,215 | 100% |
Average Blocksize is 1.322 KB. Good :)
author | royalmacro |
---|---|
permlink | re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t191728251z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 19:17:21 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 19:17:21 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.380 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.001 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 38 |
author_reputation | 181,020,262,458,461 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 787,476 |
net_rshares | 436,901,914,156 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
masteryoda | 0 | 436,345,620,623 | 100% | ||
fabiocortes10 | 0 | 469,048,387 | 100% | ||
cryptoeasy | 0 | 87,245,146 | 100% |
is there a max block size cap like in bitcoin? If so is this something that is adjusted automatically?
author | solar |
---|---|
permlink | re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t160345196z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 16:03:45 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 16:03:45 |
depth | 1 |
children | 2 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.328 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.107 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 102 |
author_reputation | 1,511,386,357,565 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 784,280 |
net_rshares | 492,095,185,064 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
masteryoda | 0 | 490,823,307,611 | 100% | ||
terryrall | 0 | 1,123,123,153 | 100% | ||
cryptoeasy | 0 | 91,961,100 | 100% | ||
xavimm | 0 | 56,793,200 | 100% |
There is a hard cap set by witnesses and a lower soft cap that causes bandwidth limits to kick in (users' allowable bandwidth is limited by SP).
author | smooth |
---|---|
permlink | re-solar-re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t163511400z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 16:35:12 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 16:35:12 |
depth | 2 |
children | 1 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.338 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.107 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 144 |
author_reputation | 253,602,537,834,068 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 784,800 |
net_rshares | 501,601,951,716 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
masteryoda | 0 | 490,823,307,611 | 100% | ||
dmilash | 0 | 1,146,258,326 | 100% | ||
timsaid | 0 | 8,414,943,550 | 100% | ||
terryrall | 0 | 1,123,123,153 | 100% | ||
cryptoeasy | 0 | 94,319,076 | 100% |
Thanks @smooth for the explanation!
author | masteryoda |
---|---|
permlink | re-smooth-re-solar-re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t184651434z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"],"users":["smooth"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 18:46:57 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 18:46:57 |
depth | 3 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.388 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 35 |
author_reputation | 130,752,413,451,298 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 786,982 |
net_rshares | 444,648,659,191 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
masteryoda | 0 | 436,322,330,121 | 100% | ||
timsaid | 0 | 8,232,009,994 | 100% | ||
cryptoeasy | 0 | 94,319,076 | 100% |
amazing post. many many thanks to you.
author | steampty |
---|---|
permlink | re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t163036259z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 16:30:27 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 16:30:27 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.316 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.103 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 38 |
author_reputation | 6,754,947,538,797 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 784,715 |
net_rshares | 477,269,498,059 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
masteryoda | 0 | 477,189,326,844 | 100% | ||
cryptoeasy | 0 | 80,171,215 | 100% |
Truly a good progress from steemit
author | sudisetan |
---|---|
permlink | re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t175810651z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 17:58:03 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 17:58:03 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.376 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.005 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 34 |
author_reputation | 157,647,921,272 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 786,104 |
net_rshares | 437,247,827,871 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
masteryoda | 0 | 436,299,034,331 | 100% | ||
sudisetan | 0 | 382,303,303 | 100% | ||
fabiocortes10 | 0 | 479,245,091 | 100% | ||
cryptoeasy | 0 | 87,245,146 | 100% |
great job. but, how can you mange it ? All this stats are 100% accurate ?
author | sujoy1990 |
---|---|
permlink | re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t161354711z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 16:13:45 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 16:13:45 |
depth | 1 |
children | 1 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.306 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.101 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 73 |
author_reputation | 3,377,873,661,460 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 784,435 |
net_rshares | 463,555,346,077 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
masteryoda | 0 | 463,555,346,077 | 100% |
Yes the data is collected from the blockchain using software, so it's the most accurate.
author | masteryoda |
---|---|
permlink | re-sujoy1990-re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t172014504z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 17:20:18 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 17:20:18 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.408 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 88 |
author_reputation | 130,752,413,451,298 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 785,448 |
net_rshares | 464,099,084,928 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
masteryoda | 0 | 463,555,346,077 | 100% | ||
fabiocortes10 | 0 | 458,851,682 | 100% | ||
cryptoeasy | 0 | 84,887,169 | 100% |
I'm really surprised there are still empty blocks. I'm wondering if this is a mining issue or technical issue rather than in direct relation to posting. I know there are still occasionally empty bitcoin blocks.
author | thecryptofiend |
---|---|
permlink | re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t160505024z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 16:05:03 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 16:05:03 |
depth | 1 |
children | 6 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.340 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.110 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 212 |
author_reputation | 323,603,913,866,384 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 784,304 |
net_rshares | 508,504,167,558 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
masteryoda | 0 | 504,457,288,378 | 100% | ||
fabiocortes10 | 0 | 438,458,274 | 100% | ||
bones | 0 | 2,435,381,169 | 100% | ||
terryrall | 0 | 1,173,039,737 | 100% |
A new block is produced about every 3 seconds. With that kind of speed, I'm not surprised there are still some empty blocks.
author | bones |
---|---|
permlink | re-thecryptofiend-re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t164609273z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 16:46:06 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 16:46:06 |
depth | 2 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.354 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.105 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 124 |
author_reputation | 116,856,214,624 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 784,951 |
net_rshares | 516,952,688,921 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
masteryoda | 0 | 504,457,288,378 | 100% | ||
thecryptofiend | 0 | 10,739,281,388 | 100% | ||
fabiocortes10 | 0 | 438,458,274 | 100% | ||
terryrall | 0 | 1,123,123,153 | 100% | ||
wizwom | 0 | 194,537,728 | 100% |
Actually I was surprised as well but like @bones mentioned here, the block time is 3 seconds, which allows for more data absorption thus some blocks are still empty, which is a good thing in my opinion, it means Steem can handle much more data in the future.
author | masteryoda |
---|---|
permlink | re-thecryptofiend-re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t171400332z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"],"users":["bones"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 17:14:06 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 17:14:06 |
depth | 2 |
children | 4 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.460 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 258 |
author_reputation | 130,752,413,451,298 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 785,352 |
net_rshares | 516,697,227,307 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
masteryoda | 0 | 504,457,288,378 | 100% | ||
thecryptofiend | 0 | 10,739,281,388 | 100% | ||
alifton | 0 | 327,617,804 | 100% | ||
terryrall | 0 | 1,173,039,737 | 100% |
The small blocks and block time are exactly why there's still empty blocks. Steem was built to upscale like crazy which by all accounts is a good thing. Empty blocks = room for growth without a need for a hard fork to increase the block size or reduce block time confirmation. I've noticed that the average time to complete a STEEM transaction is about 5 minutes which is nothing compared to the hours I've waited for a Bitcoin transaction to be validated. Block size and block confirmation times are something Bitcoin users know all too well is a real pain. It has been a matter of debate for many months because a hard fork to increase the Bitcoin block size to over the 1MB cap would render current ASIC's useless and put the screws to many major mining operations. Bitcoin has all but maxed out the network's ability to process blocks at a reasonable rate because of the block size issue, but no one can seem to stop arguing about it long enough to just fork and fix it. It's a real damned if you do, damned if you don't issue that I'm sure we'll hear more about sooner rather than later.
author | alifton |
---|---|
permlink | re-masteryoda-re-thecryptofiend-re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160814t011448902z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"]} |
created | 2016-08-14 01:14:51 |
last_update | 2016-08-14 01:14:51 |
depth | 3 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.308 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.060 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 1,101 |
author_reputation | 661,948,714,392 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 792,442 |
net_rshares | 424,015,696,619 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
masteryoda | 0 | 422,867,615,174 | 100% | ||
terryrall | 0 | 1,148,081,445 | 100% |
Yes definitely it makes sense. I think this allows a lot more bandwidth than most other blockchains. Is this due to it being built on graphene?
author | thecryptofiend |
---|---|
permlink | re-masteryoda-re-thecryptofiend-re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t171932383z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 17:19:33 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 17:21:33 |
depth | 3 |
children | 2 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.374 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.021 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 145 |
author_reputation | 323,603,913,866,384 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 785,435 |
net_rshares | 451,397,064,559 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
masteryoda | 0 | 449,921,365,310 | 100% | ||
alifton | 0 | 327,617,804 | 100% | ||
terryrall | 0 | 1,148,081,445 | 100% |
Another proof Graphene is the future tech!
author | timsaid |
---|---|
permlink | re-masteryoda-a-look-at-steem-blocksize-evolution-20160813t193153402z |
category | stats |
json_metadata | {"tags":["stats"]} |
created | 2016-08-13 19:31:51 |
last_update | 2016-08-13 19:31:51 |
depth | 1 |
children | 0 |
last_payout | 2016-09-13 05:05:00 |
cashout_time | 1969-12-31 23:59:59 |
total_payout_value | 0.368 HBD |
curator_payout_value | 0.007 HBD |
pending_payout_value | 0.000 HBD |
promoted | 0.000 HBD |
body_length | 42 |
author_reputation | 338,948,364,553,435 |
root_title | "A look at Steem blocksize evolution" |
beneficiaries | [] |
max_accepted_payout | 1,000,000.000 HBD |
percent_hbd | 10,000 |
post_id | 787,710 |
net_rshares | 431,688,895,789 |
author_curate_reward | "" |
voter | weight | wgt% | rshares | pct | time |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
masteryoda | 0 | 422,709,819,979 | 100% | ||
fabiocortes10 | 0 | 479,245,091 | 100% | ||
timsaid | 0 | 8,414,943,550 | 100% | ||
cryptoeasy | 0 | 84,887,169 | 100% |