I argue that the meaning of life is nothing because for one to argue the meaning of something you must first find an origin which in this case in my opinion is nothing or possibly something which then has to come from something and if it's a causality loop then checkmate because those need to have an origin which needs to have an origin too. Anyways back to nothing, to have an answer from every possible angle one must first be infinite which would mean then that you are everything in the universe, congrats you now do and don't exist because you already happened and never happened and in actually you never had time or never will? Even if you the universe experience it all at once you become pointless and also a mathematical paradox if you want an identity.. you cannot be something and occupy a part of it otherwise you're neither? I think the universe is like pi, the depth of which you look into it is it's meaning relative to all the other meanings and really the only purposeful thing to do is keep existing looking at as many relative depths of the meaning.. like a relative infinity.. never ending but still having a rate, unlike true infinity which doesn't.. but then you can become an even bigger infinity beyond your infinity.. and you still aren't truly infinite.. no matter how far back you can go if you can count it or give it a range it's still self-contained.. I think and if you were to look into continuum ad infinitum perpetually without a limit to your expansion makes you a part of it as you cannot end nor begin.