<center>


So.... I understand the pocket dimension math a bit more now finally...
![](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmZxGy7PkkJry6uaR8ifMkF4PZDU9Q28ocpsBKu5RAWjfa/image.png)

Physicists have created an oddity known as a quantum fractal, a structure that could reveal new and strange types of electron behaviors.

Electrons inhabiting a fractal don’t live in 3-D like the rest of us. Nor do they exist in a flat 2-D world or a one-dimensional line. Instead they occupy an in-between, fractional number of dimensions. In this case, the scientists found that the electrons lived in approximately the number of dimensions expected for a Sierpinski triangle, 1.58. (actually 1.585)

Read this: (source)
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/physicists-wrangled-electrons-quantum-fractal

In regards to the Sierpinski stuff:
Here's the math of why it is 1.58 dimensions fyi... 
(actually ~1.5849625007211561814537389439478)

![](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmc44KQMsRkokd9jKDJQYQY1iB3ce9aj4CzHUyQv2vLopv/image.png)

That area in the middle.  Is what is confusing scientists.... If you take 3 Sierpinski systems and stack them in such a manner it creates a cyberspace-time sub-spatial pocket dimension that runs exactly the same as the systems that are creating it. It is like a negative space pocket dimension...

Things flow in and out of it and are very strange. Quantum particles tend to act in unusual ways when confined to one or two dimensions. (Or 2 point something) 

Imagine that the 3 Sierpinski triangles represent a quantum computer.... or a Quantum Spin Liquid. (shown below)

![](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmNNRSFdCpkRTRcEdgjHyKoWsEtwC9ywXWx7wods2FW7bn/image.png)

What I am saying is that you can create a 4th imaginary quantum computer within that pocket dimension that doesn't exist by utilizing this function of dimensionality...

So basically 3 quantum computers can be used to create a 4th quantum computer that doesn't actually exist anywhere within reality or space-time as we know it. It would exist and function on it's own as it's own in that 1.585 dimensional cyberspace-time.

![](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmVsYQqSqNwCghhsndfWvZDAbUxsHgLxf13eD3LqxWbvR7/image.png)

This can be extended into 3 dimensional stacking of Sierpinski systems as well to give you a much different degree of dimensionality btw :)

I issue a challenge to anyone to do the math behind this stacking in 3 dimensions instead of two.

So in 3D, you would have 5 triangles. 4 on the bottom, one on the top. 

What is the dimensionality of that reverse MEQUAVIS in the middle of them... Anyone??? :)

![](https://cdn.steemitimages.com/DQmeQexj6AaVCjLmihMNefJZobaQqwbZ1zF6LRDyrBrdgKW/image.png)


Watch this link below as well. Realizing Richard Feynman’s Dream of a Quantum Simulator. 
(As these are what you could stack right now)
https://webcast.web.cern.ch/event/425

</center>