create account

Feature request: Someone please implement this (see picture) by neoxian

View this thread on: hive.blogpeakd.comecency.com
· @neoxian ·
$0.31
Feature request: Someone please implement this (see picture)
I really wish Steemit had this feature, for us curators.

https://i.imgsafe.org/f1003a430d.png

Slider bar to specify what time you want your vote to go in.

https://i.imgsafe.org/8c93836fc9.jpg
👍  , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , and 22 others
👎  
properties (23)
authorneoxian
permlinkfeature-request-someone-please-implement-this-see-picture
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit","voting","curation"],"image":["https://i.imgsafe.org/f1003a430d.png","https://i.imgsafe.org/8c93836fc9.jpg"],"app":"steemit/0.1","format":"markdown"}
created2017-03-07 19:57:12
last_update2017-03-07 19:57:12
depth0
children17
last_payout2017-04-07 21:11:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.278 HBD
curator_payout_value0.028 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length194
author_reputation167,518,216,312,453
root_title"Feature request: Someone please implement this (see picture)"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,667,473
net_rshares5,821,378,445,900
author_curate_reward""
vote details (87)
@cryptohazard ·
$0.02
I wish there was "timed" posting ...
👍  
properties (23)
authorcryptohazard
permlinkre-neoxian-feature-request-someone-please-implement-this-see-picture-20170307t211128889z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-03-07 21:11:30
last_update2017-03-07 21:11:30
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-04-07 21:11:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.019 HBD
curator_payout_value0.002 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length36
author_reputation17,111,780,434,071
root_title"Feature request: Someone please implement this (see picture)"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,667,995
net_rshares824,225,424,590
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@denmarkguy ·
$0.02
Agree with this-- in principle-- but isn't the whole "30 minute issue" going to go away with HF17?
👍  ,
properties (23)
authordenmarkguy
permlinkre-neoxian-feature-request-someone-please-implement-this-see-picture-20170307t200245167z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-03-07 20:02:45
last_update2017-03-07 20:02:45
depth1
children5
last_payout2017-04-07 21:11:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.019 HBD
curator_payout_value0.003 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length98
author_reputation1,155,303,263,530,994
root_title"Feature request: Someone please implement this (see picture)"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,667,499
net_rshares857,812,180,964
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@neoxian ·
Is it?
properties (22)
authorneoxian
permlinkre-denmarkguy-re-neoxian-feature-request-someone-please-implement-this-see-picture-20170307t200340592z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-03-07 20:03:39
last_update2017-03-07 20:03:39
depth2
children1
last_payout2017-04-07 21:11:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length6
author_reputation167,518,216,312,453
root_title"Feature request: Someone please implement this (see picture)"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,667,507
net_rshares0
@whatsup ·
... Inquiring minds want to know.
properties (22)
authorwhatsup
permlinkre-neoxian-re-denmarkguy-re-neoxian-feature-request-someone-please-implement-this-see-picture-20170307t203327257z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-03-07 20:33:30
last_update2017-03-07 20:33:30
depth3
children0
last_payout2017-04-07 21:11:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length33
author_reputation519,839,651,581,670
root_title"Feature request: Someone please implement this (see picture)"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,667,664
net_rshares0
@timcliff ·
$0.02
I haven't seen anything along these lines in any of the changes. I could be wrong, but I'm fairly sure this is not there.
👍  
properties (23)
authortimcliff
permlinkre-denmarkguy-re-neoxian-feature-request-someone-please-implement-this-see-picture-20170308t004914023z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-03-08 00:49:12
last_update2017-03-08 00:49:12
depth2
children2
last_payout2017-04-07 21:11:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.015 HBD
curator_payout_value0.005 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length121
author_reputation272,954,445,077,789
root_title"Feature request: Someone please implement this (see picture)"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,669,273
net_rshares790,351,135,299
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@denmarkguy ·
It may just have been something that came up during an active discussion on a post.
👍  
properties (23)
authordenmarkguy
permlinkre-timcliff-re-denmarkguy-re-neoxian-feature-request-someone-please-implement-this-see-picture-20170308t005041377z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-03-08 00:50:42
last_update2017-03-08 00:50:42
depth3
children1
last_payout2017-04-07 21:11:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length83
author_reputation1,155,303,263,530,994
root_title"Feature request: Someone please implement this (see picture)"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,669,278
net_rshares45,853,572,532
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@dwinblood ·
$0.02
Heh... LOL... wasn't the 30 minutes there primarily so best rewards were for people who likely actually read the thing they are voting on?   While I know content lengths vary, and some read faster than others... wouldn't that feature kind of defeat the entire purpose of that?    Might as well just remove the time element from the curation algorithm I'd think if we were going to do that...

or am I missing something?
👍  ,
properties (23)
authordwinblood
permlinkre-neoxian-feature-request-someone-please-implement-this-see-picture-20170307t200047595z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-03-07 20:00:48
last_update2017-03-07 20:00:48
depth1
children4
last_payout2017-04-07 21:11:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.018 HBD
curator_payout_value0.003 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length419
author_reputation383,232,067,634,988
root_title"Feature request: Someone please implement this (see picture)"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,667,493
net_rshares839,296,938,982
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@neoxian ·
The reverse auction is primarily in place to punish bots who just instantly upvote certain content.
properties (22)
authorneoxian
permlinkre-dwinblood-re-neoxian-feature-request-someone-please-implement-this-see-picture-20170307t200603273z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-03-07 20:06:03
last_update2017-03-07 20:06:03
depth2
children3
last_payout2017-04-07 21:11:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length99
author_reputation167,518,216,312,453
root_title"Feature request: Someone please implement this (see picture)"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,667,520
net_rshares0
@dwinblood ·
Which it'd be pretty easy to make some adjustments to a bot and have it vote in 30 minutes instead.
properties (22)
authordwinblood
permlinkre-neoxian-re-dwinblood-re-neoxian-feature-request-someone-please-implement-this-see-picture-20170307t200729335z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-03-07 20:07:27
last_update2017-03-07 20:07:27
depth3
children2
last_payout2017-04-07 21:11:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.000 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length99
author_reputation383,232,067,634,988
root_title"Feature request: Someone please implement this (see picture)"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,667,528
net_rshares0
@jrcornel · (edited)
$0.05
Now that would be something... Although if they do away with the 30 minute curation penalty, this wouldn't really be needed. As of right now though, it would be nice. :)
👍  , , ,
properties (23)
authorjrcornel
permlinkre-neoxian-feature-request-someone-please-implement-this-see-picture-20170307t195848330z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-03-07 19:58:45
last_update2017-03-07 19:59:39
depth1
children0
last_payout2017-04-07 21:11:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.046 HBD
curator_payout_value0.003 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length169
author_reputation2,133,450,396,741,846
root_title"Feature request: Someone please implement this (see picture)"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,667,481
net_rshares1,610,497,193,082
author_curate_reward""
vote details (4)
@timcliff ·
$0.02
I agree, this would be a great change!

Here are the challenges I see:
- It would not be good to implement at a blockchain level, because then other users could 'front run' based on votes that they knew would be happening.
- If it was not implemented at the blockchain level, it would mean that sites like Steemit would need to be able to submit votes without the user actually entering their private key at the time of voting. This would mean some type of private key storage, which poses quite a few security challenges.
👍  
properties (23)
authortimcliff
permlinkre-neoxian-feature-request-someone-please-implement-this-see-picture-20170308t005239694z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-03-08 00:52:36
last_update2017-03-08 00:52:36
depth1
children1
last_payout2017-04-07 21:11:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.016 HBD
curator_payout_value0.004 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length522
author_reputation272,954,445,077,789
root_title"Feature request: Someone please implement this (see picture)"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,669,289
net_rshares790,338,449,818
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@neoxian ·
$0.03
Time for the local steemit browser...
👍  ,
properties (23)
authorneoxian
permlinkre-timcliff-re-neoxian-feature-request-someone-please-implement-this-see-picture-20170308t005410722z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-03-08 00:54:09
last_update2017-03-08 00:54:09
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-04-07 21:11:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.027 HBD
curator_payout_value0.000 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length37
author_reputation167,518,216,312,453
root_title"Feature request: Someone please implement this (see picture)"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,669,297
net_rshares901,521,743,271
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)
@whatsup · (edited)
$0.02
Hmm, Interesting idea.  I try not to consider curation rewards and my account suffers for it.  :)  I usually will just vote when I see something I like.  This might be a good idea, once in a while.  

I don't know if there would be any downside for the times I don't want to do anything extra.  (Because you know an extra click is so annoying)  :)
PS: I Really like your name "logo".
👍  
properties (23)
authorwhatsup
permlinkre-neoxian-feature-request-someone-please-implement-this-see-picture-20170307t203223114z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-03-07 20:32:24
last_update2017-03-07 20:33:03
depth1
children1
last_payout2017-04-07 21:11:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.016 HBD
curator_payout_value0.005 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length383
author_reputation519,839,651,581,670
root_title"Feature request: Someone please implement this (see picture)"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,667,649
net_rshares824,205,284,105
author_curate_reward""
vote details (1)
@neoxian ·
$0.02
The second bar could default to "now" so you wouldn't have to do any extra clicks for the existing behavior.

Thanks, @vlad made me that logo.
👍  ,
properties (23)
authorneoxian
permlinkre-whatsup-re-neoxian-feature-request-someone-please-implement-this-see-picture-20170307t210643163z
categorysteemit
json_metadata{"tags":["steemit"],"users":["vlad"],"app":"steemit/0.1"}
created2017-03-07 21:06:42
last_update2017-03-07 21:06:42
depth2
children0
last_payout2017-04-07 21:11:54
cashout_time1969-12-31 23:59:59
total_payout_value0.018 HBD
curator_payout_value0.003 HBD
pending_payout_value0.000 HBD
promoted0.000 HBD
body_length142
author_reputation167,518,216,312,453
root_title"Feature request: Someone please implement this (see picture)"
beneficiaries[]
max_accepted_payout1,000,000.000 HBD
percent_hbd10,000
post_id2,667,938
net_rshares839,708,645,068
author_curate_reward""
vote details (2)