Steemit really needs to increase thread depth by noodhoog

View this thread on: hive.blog | peakd.com | ecency.com

steemit · @noodhoog · Aug 20 '16

$0.23

Steemit really needs to increase thread depth

I'd never actually realized that there's a limit to comment depth on here until I ran into [this thread](https://steemit.com/introduceyourself/@heretickitten/i-m-a-popular-celebrity-and-i-just-joined-steemit-could-i-have-my-usd2000-for-passing-go#@daut44/re-noodhoog-re-daut44-re-noodhoog-re-daut44-re-heretickitten-i-m-a-popular-celebrity-and-i-just-joined-steemit-could-i-have-my-usd2000-for-passing-go-20160820t055253811z) where I was BSing back and forth with @daut44 and @heretickitten and suddenly discovered I couldn't reply any more, presumably due to too many levels of comments.

If Steemit is to grow as a community this should really be fixed. Some of the greatest moments on Reddit have come from comments which were miles deep in a thread, and to just suddenly have your ability to continue a conversation cut off really stifles discussion, particularly when the most interesting posts will be the ones to generate discussion which goes that deep.

👍 blakemiles84, schro, albensilverberg, akareyon, jaycobbell, plasticfuzzy, michaeldodridge, noodhoog, proglobyte, dennislee, ivicaa, mrspanke

`author`	noodhoog
`permlink`	steemit-really-needs-to-increase-thread-depth
`category`	steemit
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steemit","comments","features","help"],"users":["daut44","heretickitten"],"links":["https://steemit.com/introduceyourself/@heretickitten/i-m-a-popular-celebrity-and-i-just-joined-steemit-could-i-have-my-usd2000-for-passing-go#@daut44/re-noodhoog-re-daut44-re-noodhoog-re-daut44-re-heretickitten-i-m-a-popular-celebrity-and-i-just-joined-steemit-could-i-have-my-usd2000-for-passing-go-20160820t055253811z"]}
`created`	2016-08-20 06:01:30
`last_update`	2016-08-20 06:01:30
`depth`	0
`children`	2
`last_payout`	2016-09-20 07:35:48
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.182 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.045 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	961
`author_reputation`	2,644,530,362,642
`root_title`	"Steemit really needs to increase thread depth"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	901,573
`net_rshares`	550,353,813,624
`author_curate_reward`	""

properties (23)vote details (12)

voter	rshares	pct
blakemiles84	321,041,259,567	100%
schro	132,171,025,824	100%
proglobyte	581,145,121	100%
akareyon	18,595,015,644	100%
jaycobbell	12,297,298,841	100%
noodhoog	7,413,565,831	100%
michaeldodridge	7,456,290,619	100%
plasticfuzzy	11,947,206,963	100%
albensilverberg	38,647,715,253	100%
dennislee	95,983,025	100%
ivicaa	55,668,201	100%
mrspanke	51,638,735	100%

@funnyman · Aug 20 '16

Yeah!! That would be great. It will also increase users activity on posts.

properties (22)

`author`	funnyman
`permlink`	re-noodhoog-steemit-really-needs-to-increase-thread-depth-20160820t060259382z
`category`	steemit
`json_metadata`	{"tags":["steemit"]}
`created`	2016-08-20 06:03:00
`last_update`	2016-08-20 06:03:00
`depth`	1
`children`	0
`last_payout`	2016-09-20 07:35:48
`cashout_time`	1969-12-31 23:59:59
`total_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`curator_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`pending_payout_value`	0.000 HBD
`promoted`	0.000 HBD
`body_length`	74
`author_reputation`	131,083,784,663,281
`root_title`	"Steemit really needs to increase thread depth"
`beneficiaries`	`[]`
`max_accepted_payout`	1,000,000.000 HBD
`percent_hbd`	10,000
`post_id`	901,587
`net_rshares`	0

@schro · Aug 20 '16

I think a small work-around exists, but not sure to what depth. I found i couldnt reply in steemit.com in the comments section. But if i opened the link to the comment from steemstats.com it would open just the parent comment and i could reply.
Hope this makes sense, im on mobile otherwise i would screenshot etc.
It's not a great solution but might be a good temporary fix.

properties (22)